R. Kore, R. Srivastava / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 376 (2013) 90–97
91
spectra were recorded on Analytikjena Specord 250 PLUS spec-
1
13
trophotometer. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) ( H and C)
spectra were recorded on Bruker AM, 400 MHz NMR. Electrospray
ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was performed by a Waters
Q-ToF Micro equipped with ESI Source with capillary voltage of
3
000 V and cone voltage 30 V. Analysis was performed in negative
ion mode. Acid values of the BAILs were determined by titration
with alkali solution using phenolphthalein as the indicator.
2.3. Catalytic reaction
In typical procedure, the oxime (1.0 mmol), cata-
a
lyst1 + catalyst2 (catalyst1 = ILs, 0.0–0.1 mmol); catalyst2 = metal
chlorides (0.0–0.125 mmol), where metal = Al, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni,
Cu, Zn, Sn, and Ce) and 4 mL acetonitrile were charged into a
2
5 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and
condenser. The reactions were allowed to proceed for 0.5–4 h at
98–373 K. The reaction mixture was analyzed using gas chro-
2
matography (Yonglin 6100; BP-5; 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 m).
The products were identified by GC–MS (Hewlett-Packard; 30 m
long, 0.25 mm i.d., with a 0.25-m-thick capillary HP5column)
and authentic samples obtained from Aldrich.
For the recovery of the ILs after the reaction, reaction mix-
ture was evaporated. Since reactant and products are soluble in
diethyl ether, therefore reaction mixture was washed 4–5 times
with diethyl ether to remove the reactant and products and leaving
behind the catalyst in the reaction flask. Reaction flask containing
ILs were subjected to Rota-evaporation, followed by drying in vac-
uum to remove solvent from the ILs. Reactants were again charged
into the reaction flask containing recovered ILs and reaction was
performed by the above mentioned method.
2.4. Theoretical study details
The minimum-energy geometries of ILs were determined by
performing DFT geometry optimizations at the B3LYP/6-31G level
using the Gaussian09 program [34]. A vibrational analysis was per-
formed to ensure the absence of negative frequencies and verify
the existence of a true minimum.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation for the synthesis of ILs investigated in this
study.
get [C SO Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ] as a viscous liquid. With an increase
3
3
2
of the ZnCl2 mass in the reaction, the viscosity of the ionic liquid
3. Results and discussions
(
[C SO Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ]) also increased.
3
3
2
[
Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ], [HPyr][Cl]–[ZnCl ], and [HCl]–[ZnCl2]
2
2
3.1. Synthesis and characterization of ILs
were synthesized according to the similar procedure that
was adopted for the synthesis of [C SO Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ].
3
3
2
A library of ILs was prepared by varying the cations and anions
(Scheme 1). Structure of ILs was characterized using various spec-
troscopic tools such as FT-IR, NMR, and Mass spectrometer. Acidity
of Brönsted acidic ILs (BAILs) investigated in this study was mea-
sured using UV–visible spectrophotometer with a basic indicator by
following the method reported in literature [35,36]. Acidity of BAILs
was investigated in water using 4-nitroanline as indicator. With the
increase of acidity of the BAILs, the absorbance of the unprotonated
form of the basic indicator decreased, whereas the protonated form
of the indicator could not be observed because of its small molar
In
a
typical synthesis, ZnCl2 was reacted with equiva-
lent amount of ([Hmim][Cl]/[HPyr][Cl]/[HCl]) to obtain
[
Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ]/[HPyr][Cl]–[ZnCl ]/[HCl][ZnCl ].
2 2 2
−
1
[
HPyr][Cl]: IR (KBr, ꢀ, cm ) = 615, 679, 752, 926, 1000, 1053,
1
3
1
163, 1198, 1249, 1332, 1385, 1485, 1537, 1611, 1634, 2621, 2947,
1
060, 3400. H NMR (400 MHz, D O): ı (ppm) = 8.8 (d, 2H), 8.7 (t,
2
1
3
H), 8.1 (t, 2H). C NMR (400 MHz, D O): ı (ppm) = 145, 143, 128.
2
Elemental analysis for C5H NCl: Theoretical (%): C 51.97, H 5.23, N
6
1
2.12; Experimental (%): C 51.23, H 5.74, N 12.5.
[
C SO Hmim][Cl]–[ZnCl ]: IR (KBr, ꢀ, cm−1) = 655, 745, 1033,
+
3
3
2
absorptivity and its location. Therefore, the [I]/[IH ] (I represents
1
3
169, 1215, 1367, 1443, 1532, 1739, 2321, 2970, 3022, 3108, 3151,
indicator) ratio can be determined from the differences of measured
absorbance after the addition of BAILs and Hammett function, H0,
can be calculated using Eq. (1). This value can be regarded as the
relative acidity of the BAILs.
1
443. H NMR (400 MHz, D O): ı (ppm) = 8.6 (s, 1H), 7.2 (s, 2H), 4.1
2
13
(
t, 2H), 3.6 (s, 3H), 2.7 (t, 2H), 2.1 (m, 2H). C NMR (400 MHz, D O):
2
−
ı (ppm) = 134, 121, 120, 46, 44, 33, 24. MS (ESI) for [ZnCl ] m/z
1
3
−
−
71, [Zn Cl5] m/z 306.6, and [Zn Cl7] m/z 443.
ꢀ
ꢁ
2
3
I
H = pK(I) + log
(1)
0
aq
+
IH
2.2. Characterization details
Under the same concentration of 4-nitroanline (3 mg/L,
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on
pK(I)aq = pKa = 0.99) and BAILs (50 mmol/L) in H O, H0 values of all
BAILs were determined. The maximal absorbance of the unproto-
nated form of the indicator was observed at 380 nm in water. When
2
−
1
Bruker Tensor-27 spectrometer in the range of 600–4000 cm
−1
(
spectral resolution = 4 cm
; number of scans = 100). UV–vis