J Nat Med (2010) 64:500–505
501
Compound 1 was obtained as an amorphous powder and
due to one phenyl group [d 139.5, 129.6 (92), 128.6 (92),
126.4], three anomeric carbons (d 106.4, 105.5, 102.9), and
one methylene carbon (d 36.6). In the same manner as for
1, these H- and C-NMR signals were examined in detail
and the data suggested that 2 was composed of 1 mol of
phenethyl alcohol, 2 mol of glucose, and 1 mol of arabi-
?
exhibited an [M ? Na] ion peak at m/z 631 in the positive
FAB–MS; the high-resolution (HR) positive FAB–MS
1
13
indicated the molecular formula of 1 to be C H O . The
2
5 36 5
1
H-NMR spectrum of 1 revealed the presence of four
aromatic protons [d 7.84 (1H, d, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz), 7.67
1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.46 (1H, ddd, J = 1.5, 7.5, 8.0 Hz),
.88 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz)] assigned to an ortho-
substituted phenyl group, three anomeric protons [d 5.62
1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.56 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.90 (1H, d,
J = 7.5 Hz)], and one methoxy group [d 3.90 (3H, s)]. The
C-NMR spectrum of 1 gave 25 carbon signals, including
those corresponding to one carboxyl carbon (d 166.3), six
aromatic carbons (d 157.4, 134.1, 131.6, 121.5, 121.0,
(
nose. The data also indicated that the glycosidic linkages of
4
6
the glucose units were b in C conformations and that of
1
4
the arabinose unit was a in a C conformation. Glyco-
1
1
3
(
sylation shifts [7, 8] in the C-NMR data of 2 were
observed at C-2 (?9.0 ppm) and C-6 (?6.9 ppm) of Glc.
In addition, the HMBC spectrum of 2 showed the key
1
3
0
correlations between H-1 of Glc and C-2 of Glc; H-1 of
arabinosyl unit (Ara) and C-6 of Glc; and H-1 of Glc and
C-8 of Ag. Consequently, 2 was elucidated as phenethyl
alcohol 8-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 ? 2)-[O-a-L-arabino-
pyranosyl-(1 ? 6)]-O-b-D-glucopyranoside.
Compound 3 was obtained as an amorphous powder.
?
The positive FAB–MS of 3 showed an [M ? Na] ion
1
16.4), three anomeric carbons (d 105.9, 105.7, 100.0), and
1
13
one methoxy carbon (d 52.0). These H- and C-NMR
1
1
signals were assigned with the aid of H– H COSY,
HMQC, and HMBC spectra (Tables 1, 2), and 1 was
determined to be a methyl salicylate 2-O-triglycoside,
which was composed of 1 mol of pentose and 2 mol of
hexose.
peak at m/z 587, which was 14 mass units (CH ) smaller
2
than that of 2, and the molecular formula of 3 was deter-
mined to be C H O using HR-positive FAB–MS. The
Acidic hydrolysis of 1 afforded D-xylose and D-glucose,
which were confirmed by optical rotation using chiral
detection in HPLC analyses. The coupling constants of
signals due to anomeric and methine protons of xylosyl and
2
4 36 15
1
13
H- and C-NMR spectra of 3 were superimposable on
those of 2, except for the appearance of the signals due to a
benzyl alcohol unit and the lack of the signals due to a
phenethyl alcohol unit. On the basis of these data, 3 was
concluded to be benzyl alcohol 7-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-
(1 ? 2)-[O-a-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1 ? 6)]-b-D-glucopyran-
oside.
1
glucosyl units in the H-NMR spectrum indicated that all
the monosaccharide units were of the pyranose type, and
4
all glycosidic linkages were b in C conformations. The
1
1
3
C-NMR data for the monosaccharide units were com-
pared with those of corresponding methyl pyranosides in
the literature [7]. Glycosylation shifts [7, 8] were observed
at C-2 (?7.9 ppm) and C-6 (?7.0 ppm) of the inner glu-
cosyl unit (Glc). Moreover, key correlations were observed
Compounds 4–10 were identified as kaempferol
3-O-rutinoside (4) [9], rutin (5) [9], quercetin 3-O-b-apio-
furanosyl-(1 ? 2)-O-[a-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 ? 6)]-b-gluco-
pyranoside (6) [9], phenethyl alcohol b-gentiobioside (7)
[10], zizybeoside I (8) [11], dihydroconiferyl 4-O-b-D-
glucopyranoside (9) [12], and esculeoside B (10) [2],
respectively, based on comparison of their physical and
spectral data with authentic samples or those already
reported.
0
between H-1 of the terminal glucosyl unit (Glc ) and C-2 of
Glc; H-1 of xylosyl unit (Xyl) and C-6 of Glc; and H-1 of
Glc and C-2 of aglycone moiety (Ag) in the HMBC
spectrum of 1 (Fig. 1). The structure of 1 was therefore
defined as methyl salicylate 2-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-
(1 ? 2)-[O-b-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 ? 6)]-O-b-D-glucopyra-
noside (Fig. 2).
To gain insight into the biological functions of tomato
constituents, the antioxidative properties of MeOH-eluted
Compound 2 was obtained as an amorphous powder,
and gave D-glucose and L-arabinose on acidic hydrolysis.
fractions (using a Diaion HP20 column) obtained from H O
2
extracts of ‘Komomo’ and ‘Momotarofight’ (L. esculentum)
cultivars were analyzed. The ‘Komomo’ fraction revealed
ca. threefold lower 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)
radical scavenging activity (EC50 value of 48.5 lg/ml)
than that of the ‘Momotarofight’ fraction (EC50 value of
16.5 lg/ml) (Fig. 3a). In a superoxide anion radical scav-
enging assay, the activity of the ‘Komomo’ fraction was ca.
1.4-fold higher (EC50 value of 174 lg/ml) than that of the
‘Momotarofight’ fraction (EC50 value of 246 lg/ml)
(Fig. 3b). It is conceivable that the antioxidative activities
of these tomato fractions may be because of the different
compositions and/or amount of active compounds present in
?
The positive FAB–MS of 2 showed an [M ? Na] ion
peak at m/z 601. The molecular formula of 2 was deter-
mined to be C H O using HR-positive FAB–MS. The
2
5 38 15
1
H-NMR spectrum of 2 indicated signals due to five aro-
matic protons [d 7.32 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.26 (2H, dd,
J = 8.5, 8.5 Hz), 7.15 (1H, t, J = 8.5 Hz)], one oxygen-
ated methylene group [d ca. 4.27 (1H), 3.78 (1H, ddd,
J = 7.5, 8.5, 8.5 Hz)], one methylene group [d 3.09 (2H,
m)], and three anomeric protons [d 5.29 (1H, d,
J = 8.0 Hz), 4.86 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.82 (1H, d,
1
3
J = 8.0 Hz)]. The C-NMR spectrum of 2 showed signals
123