9103
Deactivated arenes 1a–l with electron-withdrawing substituents were shown to react readily
with this reagent giving iodoarenes 2a–l with generally good yields and with complete conver-
sion of the starting materials (Table 1).
Products are obtained according to the rules for aromatic electrophilic substitution. Iodina-
tion of compounds 1b,h,i resulted in addition to the iodarenes 2b,h,i, alternative isomers in
minor quantities. In Table 1 the yields of pure, isolated major products are shown.
For complete conversion of the substrates 1a–i to the corresponding iodoarenes we use 0.5
equivalents of TIG (or double the amount of ‘active iodine’). In the case of the iodination of
compounds 1j–l, one equivalent of TIG per equivalent of the substrate was used.
A representative iodination procedure is as follows: 1.6 g (2.5 mmol) TIG was dissolved in 30
ml 90% concd sulfuric acid at room temperature with stirring. Substrates 1a–i (5 mmol) or 1j–l
(2.5 mmol) were added in one portion to the well-stirred solution at 0°C. The mixture was then
poured into ice-cold water. The products 2c,d,f,j–l were removed by filtration and the products
2a,b,e,g–i were extracted by CHCl3. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the products were
purified by recrystallization from a suitable solvent (Table 1) and identified by comparison of
their melting points and spectroscopic data (IR, NMR) with authentic samples.
The yields, mild experimental conditions, and availability of the reagent are attractive features
of this method. The reaction can be successfully applied to other arenes and heterocycles. Work
is in progress to optimize results, to expand further the scope and applications of this iodination
reagent.
Acknowledgements
We thank Russian Foundation for Fundamental Researches (grant N 00-03-32812a) for the
financial support of this work.
References
1. Merkushev, E. B. Synthesis 1988, 923.
2. Tronov, B. V.; Novikov, A. N. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Ser. Khim. Khim. Technol. [Proc. Rus. Higher
Educational Establishments, Ser. Chem. Chem. Technol.] 1960, 872.
3. (a) Barker, I. R. L.; Waters, W. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 151; (b) Derbyshire, D. H.; Waters, W. A. J. Chem. Soc.
1950, 3694.
4. Arotsky, J.; Butler, R.; Darby, A. C. J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1970, 1480.
5. Chambers, R. D.; Skinner, C. J.; Atherton, M. J.; Moillet, J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 1659.
6. Lulinski, P.; Skulski, L. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 1665.
7. Olah, G. A.; Wang, Q.; Sandford, G.; Prakash, G. K. S. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3194.
8. Chaikovski, V. K.; Kharlova, T. S.; Filimonov, V. D.; Saryucheva, T. A. Synthesis 1999, 748.
9. Chaikovski, V. K.; Kharlova, T. S.; Filimonov, V. D. Rus. Chem. Bull. 1999, 1291.
10. Yagovkin, A. Yu.; Bakibaev, A. A.; Byustrycki, E. L. Khim. Geterocycl. Comp. 1995, 1695. A mixture of 4.58 g
(0.01 mol) 2,4,6,8-tetrabromoglycoluril16,17 and 10.1 g (0.04 mol) powdered iodine was stirred into 10 ml acetic
anhydride at room temperature over 1 h. The resultant sediment of TIG (5.62 g, 87% yield) was filtered and dried
in vacuo.
11. Merkushev, E. B.; Simakhina, N. D.; Koveshnikova, G. M. Synthesis 1980, 486.
12. Wirth, H. O.; Ko¨nigstein, O.; Kern, W. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1960, 634, 84.