8
8
N. Koizumi et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 383 (2010) 79–88
greater than the difference in NO adsorption capability of these two
catalysts. It is also noted that 4,6-DMDBT HDS activity of the CyDTA-
Ni/W/SiO -Al O catalyst was still higher than that of the B-Al O3
(4) The formation of the Ni–W–S phase was effectively promoted
when the SiO -Al O supported NiW catalyst was prepared
2
2
3
using CyDTA, which was accompanied with further increase
of stacking degree and decreased the basal plane size of the
2
2
3
2
supported NiW catalyst prepared using CyDTA reported previously
12,13]. The activity enhancement by use of SiO -Al O support in
[
WS -like slabs.
2
2
3
2
combination with CyDTA was greater than those reported previ-
ously (also see above).
(5) This catalyst showed higher activity for both HYD of 4,6-
DMDBT, and C–S bond cleavage of 4,6-DMDBT and THDMDBT.
The HYD and DDS routes in HDS of 4,6-DMDBT were pro-
moted simultaneously on this catalyst, leading to three times
It was also found that use of SiO -Al O support promoted HYD
2
2
3
of 4,6-DMDBT to THDMDBT and/or HHDMDBT over the W cata-
lyst. Taking the quasi in situ TEM results into consideration, it was
higher HDS activity than the Al O3 supported NiW catalyst.
2
suggested that the formation of the WS -like slabs with higher
These results suggested that the formation of the multi-layered
Ni–W–S phase with smaller basal plane sizes is crucial for pro-
moting the HYD route in HDS of 4,6-DMDBT.
2
stacking degree, but the smaller basal plane size was effective for
promoting HYD of 4,6-DMDBT. Higher stacking degree of the WS2-
like slabs is effective for HYD of 4,6-DMDBT, probably because the
slabs with higher stacking degree will reduce steric hindrance for
References
-adsorption of 4,6-DMDBT onto their coordinatively unsaturated
[
[
1] C. Song, Catal. Today 86 (2003) 211–263.
2] D.R. Kilanowski, H. Teeuwen, V.H. de Beer, B.C. Gates, G.C.A. Schuit, H. Kwart, J.
Catal. 55 (1978) 129–137.
edge and corner sites. On the other hand, the smaller basal plane
size increases the fraction of the corner sites, which will also reduce
steric hindrance for -adsorption of 4,6-DMDBT. It is noted, how-
ever, that the W/SiO -Al O catalyst showed higher HDS activity
[3] M. Houalla, D.H. Broderick, A.V. Sapre, N.K. Nag, V.H. de Beer, B.C. Gates, H.
Kwart, J. Catal. 61 (1980) 523–527.
[
[
2
2
3
4] T. Kabe, A. Ishihara, Q. Zhang, Appl. Catal. A 97 (1993) L1–L9.
5] T. Isoda, M. Xiaoliang, I. Mochida, Sekiyu Gakkaishi 37 (1994) 368–375.
than the W/Al O catalyst. Thus, the WS2-like slabs with the above
2
3
morphology also have weak activity for C–S bond cleavage of 4,6-
DMDBT and/or THDMDBT. This structure-activity relationship will
also hold true for higher activity for HYD of 4,6-DMDBT over the
[6] P. Michaud, J.L. Lemberton, G. Pérot, Appl. Catal. A 169 (1998) 343–353.
[7] V. Meille, E. Schulz, M. Lemaire, M. Vrinat, J. Catal. 170 (1997) 29–36.
[
8] F. Bataille, J.L. Lemberton, P. Michaud, G. Pérot, M. Vrinat, M. Lemaire, E. Schulz,
M. Breysse, S. Kasztelan, J. Catal. 191 (2000) 409–422.
Ni/W/SiO -Al O catalyst
2
2
3
[9] S. Bendezú, R. Cid, J.L.G. Fierro, A.L. Agudo, Appl. Catal. A 197 (2000) 47–60.
[10] K. Segawa, Shokubai 48 (2006) 228–233.
11] H. Yasuda, M. Higo, S. Yoshitomi, T. Sato, M. Imamura, H. Matsubayashi, H.
Shimada, A. Nishijima, Y. Yoshimura, Catal. Today 39 (1997) 77–87.
12] N. Koizumi, M. Shingu, K. Hata, Y. Murata, H. Itou, M. Yamada, Prep. Am. Chem.
Soc., Div. Pet. Chem. 49 (2004) 292–296.
13] K. Hata, Master Thesis, Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of
Engineering, Tohoku University, 2004.
[14] Y. Ohta, Master Thesis, Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of
Engineering, Tohoku University, 2000.
On the other hand, activity for C–S breaking of 4,6-DMDBT and
THDMDBT was suppressed by use of SiO -Al O support for the
[
[
[
2
2
3
NiW catalyst. This was apparently related with the fact that the
formation of the Ni–W–S phase was suppressed on the SiO –Al O
2
2
3
surface as suggested by DRIFTS coupled with NO adsorption. When
the SiO -Al O supported NiW catalyst was prepared using CyDTA,
2
2
3
the formation of the Ni–W–S phase was promoted, which was
accompanied with further increase of stacking degree and decrease
[
[
[
[
15] H. Itoh, N. Koizumi, N. Sakamoto, T. Honma, M. Shingu, M. Yamada, J. Jpn. Pet.
Inst. 47 (2004) 249–257.
16] D. Li, T. Sato, M. Imamura, H. Shimada, A. Nishijima, J. Catal. 170 (1997) 357–
365.
of the basal plane size of the WS -like slabs. Such sulfide structure
2
is effective for both HYD of 4,6-DMDBT, and C–S bond cleavage of
17] D. Li, T. Sato, M. Imamura, H. Shimada, A. Nishijima, Appl. Catal. B 16 (1998)
4
,6-DMDBT and THDMDBT. The HYD and DDS routes were thus
255–260.
promoted simultaneously on this catalyst, leading to higher HDS
activity. Our results suggest that the formation of the multi-layered
Ni–W–S phase with the smaller basal plane size is crucial for pro-
moting the HYD route in HDS of 4,6-DMDBT.
18] P. Torres-Mancera, J. Ramírez, R. Cuevas, A. Gutiérrez-Alejandre, F. Murrieta, R.
Luna, Catal. Today 107 (2005) 551–558.
[19] N. Kagami, B.M. Vogelaar, A.D. van Langeveld, J.A. Moulijn, Appl. Catal. A 293
2005) 11–23.
(
[
[
[
20] C. Kwak, J.J. Lee, J.S. Bae, K. Choi, S.H. Moon, Appl. Catal. A 200 (2000) 233–242.
21] M. Sun, P.J. Kooyman, R. Prins, J. Catal. 206 (2002) 368–375.
22] Y. Ohta, T. Shimizu, T. Honma, M. Yamada, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 127 (1999)
5
. Conclusions
1
61–168.
23] T. Shimizu, K. Hiroshima, T. Honma, T. Mochizuki, M. Yamada, Catal. Today 45
1998) 271–276.
24] N. Koizumi, Y. Murata, N. Sakamoto, H. Itoh, M. Yamada, J. Jpn. Pet. Inst. 48
2005) 344–350.
[25] S. Kasahara, N. Koizumi, J. Iwahashi, M. Yamada, Sekiyu Gakkaishi 38 (1995)
45–352.
[
[
(
Effect of novel SiO -Al O support on surface structure and HDS
2
2
3
activity of the NiW catalyst prepared using CyDTA was investi-
gated by combination of quasi in situ TEM, DRIFTS coupled with NO
adsorption and 4,6-DMDBT HDS activity measurements. Important
results obtained are summarized as follows.
(
3
[
[
[
26] S. Kasahara, T. Shimizu, M. Yamada, Catal. Today 35 (1997) 59–64.
27] S. Kasahara, Y. Udagawa, M. Yamada, Appl. Catal. B 12 (1997) 225–235.
28] N. Koizumi, K. Takahashi, M. Yamazaki, M. Yamada, Catal. Today 45 (1998)
3
13–318.
(
1) In situ DRIFT measurement on SiO -Al O support showed that
2 2 3
[29] M. Yamada, N. Koizumi, M. Yamazaki, Catal. Today 50 (1999) 3–8.
[30] M. Yamada, Catal. Surv. Jpn. 3 (1999) 3–15.
strong Al–OH species was absent from the surface of this sup-
port material.
2) Without using the chelating agent, quasi in situ TEM mea-
[
31] S. Rajagopal, T.L. Grimm, D.J. Collins, R. Miranda, J. Catal. 137 (1992) 453–
61.
32] H. Knözinger, P. Ratnasamy, Catal. Rev. 17 (1978) 31–70.
4
(
[
surement showed that the WS -like slabs on the SiO -Al O
[33] W.S. Millman, W.K. Hall, J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) 427–428.
34] N.-Y. Topsøe, H. Topsøe, J. Catal. 84 (1983) 386–401.
35] Y. Okamoto, Y. Katoh, Y. Mori, T. Imanaka, S. Teranishi, J. Catal. 70 (1981)
2
2
2
3
[
[
supported W and NiW catalysts had higher stacking degree, but
smaller basal plane sizes compared with the Al O3 supported
2
445–448.
counterparts. On the other hand, the formation of the Ni–W–S
phase was suppressed when SiO -Al O support was used for
[36] Y. Okamoto, A. Maezawa, T. Imanaka, J. Catal. 120 (1989) 29–45.
[37] N. Koizumi, M. Yamazaki, M. Iijima, M. Yamada, Appl. Surf. Sci. 121–122 (1997)
2
2
3
429–432.
the NiW catalyst instead of Al O3 support.
2
[
38] D.D. Whitehurst, T. Isoda, I. Mochida, Adv. Catal. 42 (1998) 345–471.
(
3) The SiO -Al O supported NiW catalyst showed higher activity
2 2 3
[39] M. Egorova, R. Prins, J. Catal. 224 (2004) 278–287.
[40] M. Egorova, R. Prins, J. Catal. 225 (2004) 417–427.
for HYD of 4,6-DMDBT into THDMDBT than the Al O supported
2
3
[
41] Y. ver Meer, E.J.M. Hensen, J.A.R. van Veen, A.M. ver Kraan, J. Catal. 228 (2004)
33–446.
42] H. Itoh, Doctor thesis, 2004, Tohoku University, Japan.
counterpart. However, because of lower activity for C–S bond
cleavage of THDMDBT, this catalyst failed to promote the HYD
route, and showed lower HDS activity than the Al O supported
4
[
[43] N. Koizumi, K. Hata, A. Nishina, M. Yoshida, M. Yamada, Prep. Am. Chem. Soc.,
Div. Pet. Chem. 50 (2005) 382–385.
2
3
NiW catalyst.