J.C. Serrano-Ruiz et al. / Journal of Catalysis 253 (2008) 159–166
165
under study yielded noticeable amounts of cinnamyl alcohol
(CALC). This fact is not strange since it is well known that the
selective hydrogenation of the carbonyl bond is more difficult
to achieve when lower aldehydes are involved and the reaction
takes place in gas phase [45]. Table 1 also shows the selec-
tivity to cinnamyl alcohol (CALC) and hydrocinnamaldehyde
(HALD) at equal conversion level (10%) for the three catalysts
under study. It is interesting to observe that polycrystalline Pt/C
showed lower selectivity to CALC than preferentially oriented
samples. This fact can be explained in terms of particle size. It
is well known that metal particle size has a strong influence in
the selectivity to cinnamyl alcohol in the case of monometallic
platinum catalysts [46]. Thus, the selectivity for C=O hydro-
genation increased with increasing crystallite size. Note that
Pt/C showed an average platinum particle size of 3 nm while
in preferred oriented samples, Pt(100)/C and Pt(111)/C, plat-
inum is in form of large particles of around 10 nm size (see
Fig. 1). Repulsive interactions between the phenyl ring and the
large metal crystallites, which hinders the interaction via the
C=C bond and enhances interaction via C=O bond, is pro-
posed to explain this behavior. This effect is absent in the case
of small metal particles because both double bonds, C=C and
C=O, could approach the surface with less repulsive interac-
tions between the phenyl ring and the metal surface [47].
Furthermore, it can be seen in Table 1 that Pt(111)/C showed
higher selectivity to CALC than Pt(100)/C (48 vs 36%). In this
case no size effect can be invoked since both samples showed
similar average particle size (10 nm). However, as pointed be-
fore, both catalysts differ in the facets distribution of the metal
particles, with a higher ratio of (111) domains in the case of
Pt(111)/C. Thus, these results clearly indicate that, besides a
size effect, the amount of (111) facets composing the metal
particle play a crucial role in increasing the selectivity to un-
saturated alcohol in these kind of reactions. In this way, previ-
ous studies on prenal hydrogenation on well-defined (111) [48]
and (110) [49] platinum surfaces, found that the main prod-
uct (also at 10% conversion) was the unsaturated alcohol and
the saturated aldehyde, respectively. Interestingly, the same au-
thors also found that prenal hydrogenation on Pt(553) (which
can be considered as a surface with (111) terraces and steps)
resulted in a lower selectivity to the unsaturated alcohol com-
pared to (111) flat surface [50]. Again, the simultaneous pres-
ence of (111) terraces (where the di-σC=O adsorption mode is
preferred) and steps (πC=C adsorption mode preferred) is in-
voked to explain the lower selectivity to the unsaturated alcohol
on this stepped surface. As already seen, it has been proved
that the platinum particles composing Pt(111)/C have a notice-
able amount of stepped surfaces vicinal to (111) small domains
(Fig. 2c), which would explain the noticeable yield of satu-
rated aldehyde (49% HALD, Table 1) obtained for this sample.
It is necessary to bear in mind that substituents at the C=C
bond have a strong influence on the selectivity to the unsat-
urated alcohol and thus, can influence the intrinsic selectivity
determined by the platinum surface. Thus, is not strange that
some works, based on the hydrogenation of the simplest unsat-
urated aldehyde (acrolein), introduced some new points to the
factors controlling the selectivity in this kind of reactions. In
a recent theoretical work, Loffreda et al. [51] concluded that
the key point which determines the selectivity to allyl alcohol
on Pt(111) is not the adsorption mode of the aldehyde, but the
competitive desorption process of the half hydrogenated prod-
ucts (unsaturated alcohol vs saturated aldehyde). Furthermore,
in contradiction with earlier assumptions, Mohr et al. [52] claim
that the surface sites responsible of the C=O hydrogenation
are the highly unsaturated surface atoms situated at corners and
edges, although these conclusions are obtained for a very spe-
cial catalytic system (Au/ZnO), and the same authors indicated
that these conclusions could not be transferred to other catalytic
systems.
4. Conclusions
The effect of the surface structure/shape of Pt nanoparticles
on the crotonaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde hydrogenation re-
actions has been evaluated. Polyoriented and preferentially ori-
ented (100) and (111) Pt nanoparticles have been synthesized
and characterized by electrochemical and microcalorimetric
techniques. TEM images of the corresponding Pt nanoparticles
show semi-spherical, cubic and tetrahedral/hexagonal preferen-
tial shapes, respectively. Cyclic voltammetry results confirm the
existence of a preferentially (100) and (111) surface orienta-
tion. In the case of the smallest Pt nanoparticles (3 nm), the
presence of a polyoriented surface orientation is also confirmed
by cyclic voltammetry. Furthermore, irreversible adsorption Bi
and Ge, as well as CO adsorption microcalorimetry, suggested
that the surface of polyoriented Pt/C is essentially constituted
of highly unsaturated platinum atoms, situated at corners and
edges. Catalytic activity in crotonaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde
hydrogenations, expressed as TOF, showed a strong depen-
dence with the face exposed, which is indicative of the struc-
ture sensitive character of these reactions. Moreover, Pt(111)/C
showed higher selectivities to unsaturated alcohol than Pt/C and
Pt(100)/C. A greater ratio of (111) facets in the surface of this
catalyst is proposed to explain the observed results.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Ministerio de Educación y
Ciencia (Spain) (Projects MAT2004-03480-C02-02, CTQ2006-
04071 and NAN2004-09267-C05-05), the Network of Exce-
lence InsidePores (European Commission Contract No. NMP3-
CT2004-500895) and Generalitat Valenciana (acomp07/052) is
gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] A. Wieckowski, E. Savinova, C. Vayenas (Eds.), Catalysis and Electro-
catalysis at Nanoparticle Surfaces, Dekker, New York, 2003.
[2] A. Wieckowski (Ed.), Interfacial Electrochemistry, Theory, Experiments
and Applications, Dekker, New York, 1998.
[3] E. Herrero, J.M. Feliu, A. Aldaz, in: A.J. Bard, M. Stratmann (Eds.),
Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry, vol. 2, Wiley–VCH, Weinheim, 2003,
p. 443.
[4] M. Boudart, Adv. Catal. 20 (1969) 153.
[5] G.A. Somorjai, Adv. Catal. 26 (1977) 1.
[6] R. Narayanan, M.A. El-Sayed, Langmuir 21 (2005) 2027.