288
D. Habibi et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 466 (2013) 282–292
phenylalcohol; well-known as Russell termination. It is expected
from this mechanism that the ratio of these products are 1.0. Dur-
ing the first 2 h of the reaction, ketone and alcohol formation takes
place only via Russell termination but at higher conversions it is
clear that other mechanisms play an important role [36,37,10].
In the next step, the ethylbenzylhydroperoxides was catalytically
decomposed by the Co(III) complex, so, the selectivity of ethylben-
tion increased and the selectivity of ethylbenzylhydroperoxides
decreased, that is, the proton of solvent can prompt decomposition
of ethylbenzylhydroperoxides, and eventually this step becomes
more rapid [10,38]. The ethylbenzylhydroperoxides in the next
steps further converts to acetophenone and 1-phenylethanol (steps
8 and 9).
The high selectivity to acetophenone and the absence of
the methylene group that was not oxidized. However, the methyl
group might be rotating more rapidly than the methylene group
and hence its hydrogen was not abstracted by activated oxygen as
shown in Scheme 3. The existence of a barrier to rotation about
Csp2 Csp3 was already reported [42]. Therefore, the hydrogen of
methylene group was more readily available for oxidation than
that of methyl group. The distant chemisorbed oxygen abstracts
the hydrogen from the methylene group of ethylbenzene and fash-
ions phenyl ethyl radical and metal hydroperoxide. The free radical
rapidly reacts with metal hydroperoxide to form 1-phenylethanol.
phenyl ethyl radical until it is hydroxylated [43]. The obtaining
1-phenylethanol is rapidly acted upon by the chemisorbed oxy-
gen on the metal active site or PINO to form the product radical
as shown in the reaction (Scheme 3). Furthermore, the oxidation
of 1-phenylethanol might be more rapid than ethylbenzene, as the
rotation of -CHOH group is slower than the CH2 group. Con-
sequently, the hydrogen atom which reacted with active sites of
Co-supported catalyst was ejected by radical in order to form water
and acetophenone.
Scheme 4. Reaction products of catalytic oxidation of cyclohexene with SiO2/Al2O3-
APTMS-BPK-Co.
GC–MS. The products of the reaction were cyclohexene (CH) oxide,
2-cyclohexene-1-one and 2-cyclohexene-1-ol (see Scheme 4).
Several results of the cyclohexene conversion and the selectiv-
ity of the products are summarized in Table 3. The oxidation of
CH using NHPI proceeded even at 25 ◦C to give 2-cyclohexene-1-
one in higher selectivity after 24 h (81.7%). As the reaction time
were raised from 2 to 24 h, the CH conversion and the selectiv-
ity to 2-cyclohexene-1-one increased from 44.0 to 84.2 and 88.4
to 99.9%, respectively, while the selectivity to cyclohexene oxide
and 2-cyclohexene-1-ol were decreased at 80 ◦C. In the oxidation
of cyclohexene, all the reaction conditions showed excellent selec-
tivity for the ketone with only trace amounts (in total <1.0%) of
by-products after 8 h at 100 ◦C.
The oxidation of CH in the absence of catalyst gives low con-
version and selectivity to 2-cyclohexene-1-one at 25 ◦C (entry 1).
Furthermore, no reaction was observed in the absence of NHPI
because no radical formations from Co centers occur under the con-
ditions selected in this work [37,38]. Reaction carried out to some
than when this compound is present. NHPI oxidizes CH slowly, and
selectivity to 2-cyclohexene-1-one was not high after 24 h (58.9%).
This result is in accord to the previously reported reaction mech-
anisms [37,38], where NHPIs are responsible for radical formation
and the heterogeneous Co is the co-catalyst that enhance the activ-
the results that under the mentioned reaction conditions, the allylic
hydrogen is more reactive than the C C double bond. However, the
abstraction of hydrogen from the allylic carbon leads to allylic rad-
ical, which requires lower activation energy than the reaction at
double bond [44].
was confirmed by performing a series of consecutive experiments
in which the used catalyst was filtered, washed with fresh sol-
vent, and employed without any further treatment in another run.
The results shown in Fig. 9 clearly prove that a slight decline of
activity and selectivity occurs after seventh run. Consequently,
the results clearly suggest that the cobalt catalyst efficiently cat-
alyze conversion of cyclohexene (75%) with ca. 99% selectivity to
2-cyclohexene-1-one under NHPI and oxygen in benzonitrile as
solvent.
Besides coordination to a Schiff base ligand, the cobalt ions may
SiO2/Al2O3. Thus, the materials of blank SiO2/Al2O3 that adsorbed
cobalt acetate (0.1 g) were also used for oxidation experiment. It
turned out that the conversion of ethylbenzene was almost 9.2%
with TON of 39.14 (similar to the result of blank experiments,
Table 2, entry 1). Therefore, in the oxidation of ethylbenzene with
NHPI and oxygen under acetic acid, the cobalt ions absorbed on the
surface of the support did not contribute in the oxidation reaction.
The above observations suggest that the oxidation occurs due to
3.4. Oxidation of oximes
To assess the reusability, the catalyst was separated by filtration
after the first run, washed with ether and dried at 100 ◦C under vac-
uum and then used for the next runs under the same conditions (see
Fig. 8). No significant loss of activity and selectivity was observed,
confirming that the Co-supported catalyst has high stability during
the oxidation process. To further proof that the reaction was cat-
alyzed by the cobalt sample, we added extra ethylbenzene to the
filtrate after the removal of the catalyst and found that no more
products were produced under the same conditions.
In this protocol, a novel useful procedure for the facile deox-
imation system by reusable Co supported catalyst and molecular
oxygen as oxidant were studied (see Scheme 5). The experiments
were designed with acetophenone oxime as a model substrate.
For optimizing the conditions in oxidation of oximes, several fac-
tors have been investigated such as the amount of catalyst, the
effect of temperature, the amount of benzaldehyde and the effect of
solvent. In this reaction, the main product for oximes with electron-
donating groups is carbonyl compounds. In order to examine the
effect of catalyst on deoximation reaction; the reaction was carried
out in the presence of various amounts of catalyst. The observations
indicated that in the case of absence of catalyst, the reaction is car-
ried out slowly while in the presence of the optimum amounts of
the catalyst, the reaction is performed considerably. The maximum
3.3. Oxidation of cyclohexene
To extend the present method, the oxidation catalytic activ-
ity of the cobalt catalyst has been examined using NHPI and
oxygen under benzonitrile as solvent at several temperatures.