No reactivity was observed when the reaction was carried
out using catalytic amounts or less than 1 equiv of the Lewis
acid (Table 1, entry 9). Low conversion was observed when
1 equiv was used. To further optimize the process, examina-
tion of the reaction medium led to the selection of dichlo-
romethane as the best solvent. Reactions performed in
ethereal solvents such as THF, ether, dioxane, methyl tert-
butyl ether (MTBE), and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) gener-
ally afforded worse results in terms of reaction yield and
diastereoselectivity, and no reaction occurred in polar
solvents such as DMF, CH3CN, or water. Less promising
results were also obtained in nonpolar solvents such as 1,2-
dichloroethane (DCE), chloroform, and toluene. These results
are consistent with previous reports that nonpolar and
noncoordinating solvents are generally optimal in these types
of reaction systems. The reaction temperature also has an
important effect on the reaction. In general, lowering the
temperature resulted in a decreased reaction rate but slightly
increased the yield (Table 1, entry 8). The reaction proceeds
with high exo-selectivity.11 At this point, it is difficult to
offer a mechanistic proposal to rationalize this stereochemical
preference in light of a known thermodynamic bias for the
endo-diastereomer. However, the reaction of tryptophan or
tryptamine with a number of electrophiles has shown a
similar stereochemical outcome.8 It is also evident that the
preference of ester substituent for the exo- over the endo
position holds under acidic reaction conditions (ZrCl4 in
CH2Cl2), as endo-13a undergoes inversion. Clearly, exo-12a
becomes the more stable endo form upon treatment with
sodium tert-butoxide in DMF at 80 °C for 16 h. Thus, the
use of ZrCl4 (2 equiv) and a 1:1.1 ratio of indole/N-
acetamidoacrylate in CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 24 h
became our standard conditions.
Having established the optimal conditions for the tandem
addition/cyclization reaction, the generality of the reaction
was then examined in detail using various substituted indoles
(Table 2). The corresponding 3-substituted hexahydropyr-
rolo[2,3-b]indoles were obtained, albeit in lower yields and
diastereoselectivities (entries 1-8). When 1,3-dimethyl in-
dole was prepared and treated with N-acetamidoacrylate, the
reaction occurred demonstrating that the H atom on the N
atom is not crucial for the cascade reaction. However,
N-acetyl, N-sulfonyl, and N-BOC-indole did not afford the
desired products, clearly showing the importance of the
nucleophility of the indole. The size of the 3-alkyl group
plays an important role in the reaction (entries 2, 4, and 8).
While acceptable yields were obtained with cyclopentyl in
this position, the reaction did not proceed with the more
Table 2. Scope of the Reaction
indole
entry
R1
R2
R3
R4
yielda (%) (exo/endo)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
H
CH3
H
H
H
H
CH3
H
H
H
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
H
H
H
75 (9/1)
46 (6/1)
72 (4/1)c
69 (7/1)c
45 (3/1)
84 (4/1)
68 (3/1)
62 (6/1)
trace
CH3 CH3
CH2CH2CH2
CH3
H
H
H
H
H
H
Br
CH3
CH3
cyclopentyl
C6H5
CHdCH2
OCH3
OCH3
H
H
H
9
10
j
n.r.
a Isolated yield. b Determined by HPLC. c Exo/endo ratio was determined
1
by H NMR.
bulky γ-prenyl substituent.12 This was not unexpected as the
dehydroamino acid was likely coordinated to the bulky
zirconium metal during the reaction and would try to
minimize steric interactions by steering the large substituent
away from the metal. Translation of these conditions to the
reaction with 3-vinylindole, however, was not possible. This
more electron-rich olefin was in fact found to be much more
sensitive to the acidic catalyst, resulting mainly in decom-
position and giving a very poor product yield. The alkylation
reaction was also highly regio- and chemoselective. Indeed,
although N- and C2-electrophilic substitution of 3-substituted
indoles have been reported,13 neither N- nor C2-adducts were
detected under the reaction conditions utilized. Suitably
encouraged by these results, we commenced our investigation
using 2,3-disubstituted indoles. Gratifyingly, the domino
reaction occurred and the corresponding 2,3-disubstituted
hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles were obtained in satisfactory
yields and diastereselectivities both with 2,3-dimethylindole
and cyclopentane-fused indole. These are notable results
because the direct C3-functionalization of 2,3-disubstituted
indoles represents a great synthetic challenge. Moreover, it
represents an easy approach to C2-substituted hexahydro-
pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole analogues, difficult to obtain by the
oxyindole approach and never reported by biomimetic or
other approaches.
(9) (a) Matsuura, T.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6500. (b) Overman, J. L. E.; Paone, D. V.; Stearns, B. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 7702. (c) Fuchs, J. R.; Funk, R. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 677.
(d) Huang, A.; Kodanko, J. J.; Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 14043. (e) Trost, B. M.; Zhang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
4590. (f) Pinto, A.; Jia, Y.; Neuville, L.; Zhu, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
961.
To illustrate the synthetic utility of this methodology and
further confirm the relative stereochemistry of this reaction,
we undertook the total synthesis of (()-esermethole, the
(12) For a comprehensive review on selective catalytic indole function-
alization, see: Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
9608. For specific examples, see: (a) Lin, Y. D.; Kao, J. Q.; Chen, C. T.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5195. (b) Leitch, S.; Addison-Jones, J.; McCluskey, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2915.
(10) Angelini, E.; Balsamini, C.; Bartoccini, F.; Lucarini, S.; Piersanti,
G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5654.
1
(11) The exo/endo ratio is readily established by H NMR due to the
characteristic methyl ester resonance of both diastereoisomers. The endo-
isomer shows a remarkably upfield signal at δ 3.1 ppm, whereas the exo-
isomer shows a more common resonance at δ <3.7 ppm.
(13) For an interesting report on C-3a-prenylated pyrroloindoles, see:
Lindel, T.; Bra¨uchle, L.; Golz, G.; Bo¨hrer, P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 283.
3846
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010