consumed, and only the cross-coupling product was identi-
fied, indicating that the condensative cyclization required
higher reaction temperatures. After some trials, we found
that the desired cyclization product 8a could be obtained in
moderate yield by heating the reaction mixture at 130 °C
for 6 h after the initial cross-coupling step (entry 1). It is
noteworthy that the cross-coupling reaction was not complete
after heating at 60 °C for 24 h. The lower reactivity displayed
by bromide 7a, compared to the 2-bromoacetanilides reported
earlier by our group,9a demonstrates that the carbamate does
not provide ortho-assistance during the coupling reaction.
Increasing the temperature of the coupling reaction to 70
°C resulted in an improved yield (entry 2). Switching the
base to Cs2CO3 provided a similar result (entry 3), while a
better yield was observed when K3PO4 was employed (entry
4). Further improvement was achieved when trans-4-
hydroxy-L-proline was used as the ligand12 (entry 5). The
change in solubility of either the ligand or metal complex
was tentatively accepted to account for this difference.
We then explored the scope and limits of our newly
developed cascade process by varying the bromides and
amines. We were pleased to find that functionalized amines
such as amino acid 9b, amino amide 9c, and allyl amine 9d
delivered the corresponding 1,3-dihydrobenzimidazol-2-ones
under our reaction conditions (Table 2). Compound 8b is
obviously a promising intermediate for the assembly of the
CGRP receptor antagonist 3. The electronic nature of the
aryl bromides seems to have little influence on the reaction,
which is evident from the fact that both electron-rich and
electron-deficient aryl bromides gave satisfactory results. For
the coupling step, sterically hindered amines generally
required longer reaction times (entries 2 and 6), which is
Figure 1. Structures of some biologically important N-substituted
1,3-dihydrobenzimidazol-2-ones.
leading to substituted imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-ones.8 As a
part of our continuing effort to assemble heterocycles by Cu-
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions,9,10 we became interested
in developing a new protocol for the assembly of N-
substituted 1,3-dihydrobenzimidazol-2-ones via CuI/ligand-
catalyzed aryl amination11 of methyl o-haloarylcarbamates.
The studies thus undertaken are disclosed herein.
The reaction of methyl 2-bromophenylcarbamate 7a and
benzylamine was chosen to screen for suitable reaction
conditions (Table 1). Initially, our standard conditions for
consistent with the observations in our previous work.11l
A
wide range of functional groups on the aryl bromides, such
as ester, ketone, amide, nitro, and silyl ether groups, survived
under these reaction conditions. Heteroaryl bromide 7j
Table 1. Synthesis of N-Benzyl 1,3-Dihydrobenzimidazol-
2-one 8a via Coupling of Bromide 7a and Benzyl Amine 9aa
(10) For recent studies on the synthesis of N-heterocycles through
Ullmann-type couplings from other groups, see: (a) Evindar, G.; Batey, R.
A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 133. (b) Altenhoff, G.; Glorius, F. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2004, 346, 1661. (c) Klapars, A.; Parris, S.; Anderson, K. W.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3529. (d) Yang, T.; Lin, C.; Fu, H.;
Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4781. (e) Evindar, G.; Batey, R. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1802. (f) Martin, R.; Rodr´ıguez, R.; Buchwald, S.
L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7079. (g) Rivero, M. R.; Buchwald, S.
L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 973. (h) Yuan, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, J.; Mai,
L.; Li, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1510.
(11) For selected references, see: (a) Ma, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.; Wu,
S.; Tao, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12459. (b) Goodbrand, H. B.;
Hu, N.-X. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 670. (c) Ma, D.; Xia, C. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 2583. (d) Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7727. (e) Gujadhur, R. K.; Bates, C. G.;
Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4315. (f) Antilla, J. C.; Klapars, A.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11684. (g) Kwong, F. Y.;
Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 581. (h) Kwong, F. Y.;
Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 793. (i) Ma, D.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, H.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2453. (j) Cristau, H.-J.; Cellier, P. P.; Spindler, J.-F.;
Taillefer, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5607. (k) Cai, Q.; Zhu, W.; Zhang,
H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, D. Synthesis 2005, 496. (l) Zhang, H.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D.
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5164. (m) Shafir, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8742. (n) Zhang, Z.; Mao, J.; Zhu, D.; Wu, F.; Chen, H.;
Wan, B. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4435. (o) Rao, H.; Jin, Y.; Fu, H.; Jiang,
Y.; Zhao, Y. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3636. (p) Lange, B.; Lambers-
Verstappen, M. H.; Vondervoort, L. S.; Sereinig, N.; Rijk, R.; Vries, A. H.
M.; Vries, J. G. Synlett 2006, 3105.
entry
ligand
base
temp (°C) yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
L-proline
L-proline
L-proline
L-proline
K2CO3
K2CO3
Cs2CO3 70-130
60-130
70-130
52
58
55
65
77
K3PO4
70-130
70-130
trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline K3PO4
a
Reaction conditions: 7a (0.5 mmol), 9a (0.5 mmol), CuI (0.1 mmol),
ligand (0.2 mmol), base (1.0 mmol), DMSO (1 mL), 60 °C, 24 h (for entry
b
1), or 70 °C, 4 h (for entries 2-5), then 130 °C, 6 h. Isolated yield.
the amination of aryl bromides were attempted.11i,l Accord-
ingly, the reaction was conducted under the action of 20 mol
% of CuI, 40 mol % of L-proline, and K2CO3 in DMSO at
60 °C. It was found that after 24 h most of the bromide was
(8) Kuethe, J. T.; Wong, A.; Davies, I. W. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7752.
(9) (a) Zou, B.; Yuan, Q.; Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
2598. (b) Lu, B.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6115.
(12) This ligand was found to be more effective than L-proline in our
previous work on CuI-catalyzed C-C bond formation. See: Xie, X.; Chen,
Y.; Ma, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16050.
4292
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007