Z. Hou et al.
tion rates were obtained in cyclooctene epoxidation (Figure 7),
which verifies once again the crucial role of the [W O ] anion
[
a]
Table 5. Epoxidation of various substrates catalyzed by 1.
2
11
Entry
1
Substrate
t [h]
Conv. [%]
Sel. [%]
as the active species. Moreover, Figure 7 shows the stability of
cycloheptene
cyclohexene
1,5-cyclooctadiene
styrene
decene
3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol
geraniol
1
3
1
6
>99
>99
>99
31.8
11
>99
>99
>99
>99
48
[
[
[
b]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
c]
>99
27.8
>99
>99
93
d]
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
[
[
e]
f]
cinnamyl alcohol
79.6
2
À
[
2
(
a] Reaction conditions: substrate (1.5 mmol), catalyst ([W
mol% with respect to substrate), 30% aqueous H
O/CH OH volume ratio 1:10, 2 mL), 333 K. Conversion and selectivity
were determined by GC analysis. Conversion (%)=products (mol)/initial
(mol)ꢁ100. [b] The selectivities to 2-cyclohexene-1-ol, 2-cyclohex-
ene-1-one, and cyclohexane-1,2-diol are 9.6, 33.5, and 8.8%, respectively.
c] In aqueous H (0.5 mmol), the products were 5,6-epoxycyclooctene
with 95.8% selectivity and 1,2-5,6-di-epoxycyclooctadiene with 4.2% se-
lectivity. In aqueous H (1.0 mmol), the products were 5,6-epoxycy-
clooctene with 85.8% selectivity and 1,2-5,6-di-epoxycyclooctadiene with
4.2% selectivity. [d] The selectivities to benzoic acid and benzaldehyde
2
O
11
]
: 30 mmol,
2 2
O (0.5 mmol), solvent
H
2
3
2 2
H O
[
2
O
2
Figure 7. Comparison of reaction profiles from catalysts 1 and 2 with the
2À
same [W
2
O
11
]
loading (30 mmol). Solid points: fresh catalyst 1 (&) and 2
(~); open points: fresh catalyst 1 (&) and 2 (~) have been preserved in air
2
O
2
for 18 months, and then recycled ten consecutive times. Reaction condi-
2
À
1
tions: n (cyclooctene)/n (H
tion medium: H O/CH OH=1:10 (volume ratio).
2 2 2 11
O )/n ([W O ] )=50:17:1, T=608C, t=3 h; reac-
are 49.2 and 23.0%, respectively. [e] The selectivities to 2,3-epoxygeraniol
and 2,3-6,7-diepoxygeraniol are 93 and 7%, respectively. [f] The selectivi-
ties to cinnamaldehyde and 1-methoxypropyl-benzene are 13.0 and
2
3
7.4%, respectively.
both fresh catalysts 1 and 2 after being stored under ambient
conditions for one and a half years, then recycled ten times,
which is demonstrated by the time profile of cyclooctene ep-
oxidation. Only slight deactivation was observed for catalyst 1,
82.5% conversion after 1 hour was preserved. Meanwhile the
conversion of catalyst 2 dropped to 54.6% after 1.5 hours. This
observation proves again that catalyst 1 is much more stable
than catalyst 2.
a lower epoxide selectivity (48%; Table 5, entry 2). Styrene is
less reactive under the reaction conditions applied: styrene ep-
oxide was achieved in 31.8% conversion and 27.8% selectivity
(Table 5, entry 4). The conversion of 1-decene was also not effi-
cient although the selectivity was perfect, which reflected the
electrophilic mechanism for the epoxidation reaction. More-
over, the catalyst showed good transformation activity for allyl-
ic alcohols. Both 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol and geraniol were com-
pletely converted within 1.5 hours. The corresponding epox-
ides were obtained with 99% and 93% selectivities, respective-
ly. Furthermore, cinnamyl alcohol could also be converted
completely within 1.5 hours, but the desired product was built
with a lower selectivity of 79.6%. The catalytic reaction mecha-
nism for the epoxidation of allylic alcohols including the ex-
change of the water ligand to form the tungsten-alcoholate
species followed by the insertion of oxygen to the carbon–
carbon double bond, and the regeneration of the dinuclear
On the basis of the research above, we attempted to devel-
op another type of magnetically separable catalyst loaded with
an ionic liquid-type zwitterion 1-dodecyl-3-(3-sulfopropyl)-imi-
dazolium (DSPIM), coupling with a lacunary-type polyoxometa-
late Na PW O (PW ). The finally obtained MNP supported
7
11 39
11
PW11 was also applied to epoxidation reactions.
The starting material PW was synthesized and character-
1
1
31
31
ized by IR and P NMR, and the signal observed in P NMR
spectrum (162 MHz; D O) at a chemical shift of À10.84 ppm
2
[11a,b]
was in accordance with that reported.
In addition, as
shown in Figure 1d,e, the IR spectra of the prepared ionic salt
[
20]
À1
peroxotungstate with hydrogen peroxide is proposed. This is
possibly the reason why allylic alcohols oxidized easily as com-
pared with simple electron-deficient olefins (Table 5, entries 4
and 5 vs. Table 5, entries 6–8).
DSPIM-PW11 exhibited characteristic bands at 1076 cm and
À1
À1
À1
À1
1040 cm (PÀO), 940 cm (WÀO ), 881 cm and 848 cm
d
À1
À1
(W-O -W), and 795 cm and 718 cm (W-O -W), which were
b
c
all identical to IR bands of the Na PW O salt. The presence of
7
11 39
À1
À1
Derived catalytic systems of higher simplicity were also in-
vestigated for cyclooctene epoxidation under standard condi-
additional bands at 2922 cm , 2852 cm
(alkyl CÀH),
À1
À1
À1
1633 cm (CÀN), 1562 cm (CÀC), and 1465 cm (alkyl CÀH)
correspond to the organic part of the catalyst. All these charac-
teristic bands were preserved very well in the spectra of cata-
2
À
tions ( [W O ] (30 mmol), cyclooctene (1.5 mmol), 30% H O2
2
11
2
(
0.5 mmol), solvent (H O/CH OH volume ratio 1:10, 2 mL),
2 3
3
33 K, 3 h). An impregnation of K W O salt on reduced MNPs
lyst 3 MNP-(DSPIM-PW ) (Figure 1f). The broad band centered
2
2
11
11
À1
À1
resulted in a conversion of only 9%. Simple mixing of [DMIm]2-
W O ] with reduced MNPs led to 34% conversion in the first
at 1038–1248 cm overlaps with PÀO bands (1076, 1040 cm )
and correspond to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching
vibration of the silica oxide in Figure 1f. Overall, the FT-IR spec-
tra also provided supportive evidence of the Fe O /SiO MNP
[
2
11
[
6a]
and 5.6% in the second run. These observations verify the
importance of an intense interaction between the surface of
MNPs and the functionalized IL.
3
4
2
structure and the successful coating of the functionalized zwit-
terion onto the Fe O /SiO MNP surface.
Comparative tests of catalysts 1 and 2 with the same
3
4
2
2À
[W O ] loading were conducted. Here, nearly the same reac-
2 11
1134
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemPlusChem 2012, 77, 1128 – 1138