Mechanism of Ene Reactions of Singlet Oxygen
A R T I C L E S
one of the bonding changes without the other. Despite the lack
of an intermediate in the 1O2 ene reaction, the mechanism
involves two kinetically distinguishable steps. The steps are
distinguishable in that the overall rate of the reaction and the
product distribution may be influenced separately, that is,
through isotopic substitution. This is very unlike most “two-
stage” mechanisms, such as an asynchronous Diels-Alder
reaction. Kinetically, the ene reaction of 1O2 with simple alkenes
behaves in every way like a regular two-step mechanism. We
would therefore describe the reaction as involving a “two-step
no-intermediate mechanism”.
The only directly observable difference between a two-step
no-intermediate mechanism and a regular two-step mechanism
involving a discrete intermediate occurs if the intermediate is
trappable. Early reports of trapping an intermediate in the ene
reaction of 1O2 with tetramethylethylene were later discounted.57
Extensive efforts by one of our groups to trap an intermediate
perepoxide have failed with any simple alkene capable of
undergoing the ene reaction. Of course, these observations only
show that an intermediate, if present, has a very short lifetime.
In two-step mechanisms, there is a continuum of possible
intermediate lifetimes, down to a few femtoseconds. From this
viewpoint, a two-step no-intermediate mechanism is just the
extreme of the continuum.
The composite use of CCSD(T) single-point energies on a
grid of B3LYP geometries lead to an excellent prediction of
the experimental intermolecular KIEs and intramolecular KIE
with 3. This strongly supports the accuracy of the composite
surface in the area around the rate-limiting transition state and,
by extension, supports the accuracy of the rest of the predicted
reaction surface. The unique feature of this surface is that it
involves two adjacent saddle points with no intervening
intermediate. Accompanying dynamics calculations support the
consistency of the intramolecular KIEs in 1 and 2 with
selectivity around the valley-ridge inflection of this surface.45
The paradox where experiment supports an intermediate but
theory does not is resolved; there is no intermediate, but a two-
step no-intermediate mechanism can exhibit product selectivity
not related to the rate-limiting transition state.
The results here provide the first experimental support for a
reaction surface involving two adjacent transition states. How-
ever, from the growing number of theoretically predicted cases,
there is no reason to think that surfaces involving adjacent saddle
points should be rare. When experimental observations are
interpreted, the inadequacy of the two-dimensional picture of
Figure 1a should be remembered.
Experimental Section
This continuum is illustrated further by the consideration of
unsymmetrical alkenes. The shape of the potential surfaces
shown in Figures 1 and 5 can occur for the singlet oxygen
reaction only when the transition state leads to a valley-ridge
inflection that can form two products, such as with tetrameth-
ylethylene or cis-2-butene. With trans-2-butene, isobutylene,
propene, or related unsymmetrical alkenes, the valley on one
side of the ridge necessarily disappears, and the potential surface
becomes closely related to other two-stage mechanisms involv-
ing one transition state and a plateau that leads to product
without a second barrier. The reaction coordinates for the sym-
metrical and unsymmetrical alkenes may be very similar, but
for the unsymmetrical alkenes the second stage would not have
experimental consequences.
Ene Reaction of 6. Example Procedure. A stream of O2 was slowly
bubbled through a mixture of 19.71 g (141 mmol) of 2,4-dimethyl-3-
isopropyl-2-pentene (6),59 14.66 g of 1,2-dichloroethane (as GC
standard), 2.0 g (2.0 mmol) of Rose Bengal, 210 mL of methanol, and
210 mL of 2-propanol at ∼10 °C while the mixture was being irradiated
with a 300-W sunlamp. After 26 h, the reaction was found to be 76 (
2% complete by GC analysis. The irradiation was stopped, and 23 mL
(24.2 g, 195 mmol) of trimethyl phosphite was added dropwise at 5-10
°C. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at 25 °C, at which time
no residual hydroperoxide could be detected by GC. The volatiles were
then collected by a crude distillation (6 appears to form an azeotrope
with the alcohols) and partitioned between 200 mL of pentane and 400
mL of water. The aqueous layer was extracted with a second 200-mL
portion of pentane. The combined pentane layers were rinsed with four
250-mL portions of water, dried (MgSO4), and passed through a 6-in.
pad of silica, rinsing with pentane. The resulting solution was subjected
to two successive fractional distillations using 30-cm and 10-cm
Vigreaux columns to afford 2.35 g of the unreacted 6 (12%, 50%
recovery, bp 148-150 °C).
Conclusion
Qualitatively, the intermolecular and intramolecular 13C
isotope effects for reactions of 6 and tetramethylethylene,
respectively, support the general picture of the mechanism that
An analogous reaction using 19.0 g of 2,4-dimethyl-3-isopropyl-2-
pentene was taken to 77 ( 2% conversion, and 3.4 g of unreacted
alkene was recovered.
2
had been previously concluded from intramolecular H KIEs,
1
and they provide additional detail. The initial attack of O2 on
Ene Reaction of Tetramethylethylene. Example Procedure. A
stream of O2 was slowly bubbled through a mixture of 20.64 mL (14.61
g, 173.6 mmol) of tetramethylethylene and 112 mg (0.11 mmol) of
Rose Bengal in 100 mL of dry methanol at 0 °C while being irradiated
with a 300-W sunlamp. After 4 d, the irradiation was discontinued,
7.18 g (190 mmol) of NaBH4 was added, and the mixture was stirred
at 25 °C for 2 h. After the addition of 100 mL of water, the mix-
ture was extracted with three 50-mL portions of pentane. The com-
6 occurs at the center of the π-bond with an early transition
state. After the rate-limiting transition state, the mechanism
involves a species with the effective symmetry of a perepoxide.
Quantitatively, the isotope effects have allowed us to triage
the differing mechanisms predicted by various theoretical
methods. All of the geometry-optimizable methods employed
lead to poor predictions of the experimental KIEs. It is
particularly noteworthy that our best efforts at CASSCF
calculations did not afford accurate results. The limitations of
these calculations have been previously documented, but the
results here suggest caution in the interpretation of recent
(56) Doubleday, C., Jr.; Bolton, K.; Hase, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
5251. Doubleday, C.; Nendel, M.; Houk, K. N.; Thweatt, D.; Page, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4720. Doubleday, C. J. Phys. Chem. 2001,
105, 6333. Doubleday, C., Jr.; Bolton, K.; Hase, W. L. J. Phys. Chem. A
1998, 102, 3648. Doubleday, C.; Li, G.; Hase, W. L. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2002, 4, 304.
(57) Gollnick, K.; Haisch, D.; Schade, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1747.
(58) (a) Bobrowski, M.; Liwo, A.; Oldziej, S.; Jeziorek, D.; Ossowski, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8112. (b) Maranzana, A.; Ghigo, G.; Tonachini,
G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1414.
(59) Lion, C.; Dubois, J.-E. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1976, 1875. Newman, M. S.;
Arkell, A.; Fukunaga, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 2498.
1
CASSCF calculations looking at other O2 reactions.58
(55) Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6336. Reyes, M. B.;
Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10163. Reyes, M. B.;
Lobkovsky, E. B.; Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 641.
Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10329.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 5, 2003 1327