646
Z. XU AND J.S. GODBER
(Houston, TX). Isopropanol was from Mallinckrodt Baker of hydroperoxides over time was used to evaluate antioxidant
Inc. (Paris, KY), and ethyl ether and acetic acid were from activity for each tested compound.
Fisher Scientific Inc. (Fair Lawn, NJ). α-Tocopherol, ferulic
Statistical analysis. Each treatment and control were eval-
acid, and linoleic acid were purchased from Sigma Chemical uated three times in the linoleic acid model. The production
Co. (St. Louis, MO). Hydroperoxides and hydroxides of of each hydroperoxide of linoleic acid was analyzed using the
linoleic acid were from ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Costa General Linear Model procedure of the Statistical Analysis
Mesa, CA) and were stored at −80°C before use. Rice bran System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The rates of total produc-
was supplied from Riviana Foods, Inc. (Abbeville, LA).
tion of hydroperoxides were analyzed using the regression
Accelerated oxidation of linoleic acid. The three high-pu- model of the Statistical Analysis System. Significant differ-
rity components of γ-oryzanol, cycloartenyl ferulate, 24-meth- ence between means was considered at P < 0.05.
ylene cycloartanyl ferulate, and campesteryl ferulate, were pu-
rified from rice bran using a preparative scale reversed-phase
HPLC procedure (4). α-Tocopherol, ferulic acid, and the three
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
high-purity γ-oryzanol components were prepared at concen- Hydroperoxides of linoleic acid. Four hydroperoxides
trations of 0.08, 0.16, and 0.40 mM in hexane and isopropanol (HPODE) and hydroxides (HODE) of linoleic acid were sep-
(9:1, vol/vol) as treatments. The control was hexane and iso- arated using normal-phase HPLC (Fig. 1). Linoleic acid is
propanol (9:1, vol/vol) without the addition of any compo- susceptible to oxidation because its structure contains 1,4-
nents. Linoleic acid solution (40 mM) was prepared by dis- pentadiene that is highly vulnerable to free radical attack (11).
solving 1.1202 g of linoleic acid in 100 mL of hexane. The The hydrogen atom abstraction from the 1,4-pentadiene of
linoleic acid solution (5 mL) and 5 mL of each treatment or linoleic acid leads to a pentadienyl radical. The pentadienyl
control solution were mixed in a 25-mL test tube. The molar radical generates 9-hydroperoxy-10-trans,12-cis-octadeca-
ratios of treatment to linoleic acid were 1:100 (0.40 mM treat- dienoic acid [9HPODE(t,c)] and 13-hydroperoxy-9-cis,11-
ment solution), 1:250 (0.16 mM treatment solution), and 1:500 trans-octadecadienoic acid [13HPODE(c,t)] after addition of
(0.08 mM treatment solution). An aliquot of 500 µL of the so- oxygen. Also, the pentadienyl radical produces a new trans
lution was transferred to an HPLC vial to determine initial pentadienyl radical during β-fragmentation. The trans penta-
concentrations of hydroperoxides. Then, the test tube was in- dienyl radical produces 9-hydroperoxy-10-trans,12-trans-oc-
cubated in a 37°C water bath. Tubing connected to com- tadecadienoic acid [9HPODE(t,t)] and 13-hydroperoxy-9-
pressed air (BOC Gases, Port Allen, LA) was passed though trans,11-trans-octadecadienoic acid [13HPODE(t,t)]. Gener-
the tube cap and into the test tube with the tip of the tubing ally, the trans structure has lower energy than the cis structure
touching the bottom of the test tube. The flow rate of air was and dominates the hydroperoxides mixture (11).
controlled at 200 µL/min. Air flow in the reaction solution pro-
Adequate resolution of each hydroperoxide was obtained
duced a tiny air bubble about every 10 s. Time of sampling after HPLC conditions were optimized. Since the structure
was scheduled at 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 min from the be- and molecular weight of linoleic acid hydroperoxides and hy-
ginning of incubation. The volume of reaction solution re-
mained constant between each interval of sampling. In the
sampling step, 500 µL was taken from the reaction solution
and added to an HPLC vial after vortexing for 30 s.
Analysis of hydroperoxides of linoleic acid. The hydroper-
oxides of linoleic acid were determined using a normal-phase
HPLC method. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters (Mil-
ford, MA) 510 pump, a 680 automated gradient controller, a
715 ultra WISP sample processor, a Hewlett-Packard (San Fer-
nando, CA) diode-array detector, and a Baseline 810 chroma-
tography workstation (Waters, Milford, MA). A Zorbax SIL
(DuPont Co., Wilmington, DE) column was used with mobile
phase that consisted of hexane/ethyl ether/isopropanol/acetic
acid (100:15:0.1:0.1, by vol), and the flow rate (min, mL/min)
was 0–18, 1.8; 17–18, 1.8–2.0; 19–39, 2.0; 39–40, 2.0–1.8.
Total run time was 40 min. Absorbance at 234 nm was moni-
FIG. 1. Chromatogram of hydroperoxides and hydroxides of linoleic
acid at 200 min of oxidation time. 1: 13-hydroperoxy-9-cis-11-trans-
tored with the detector. The concentration change of each hy-
droperoxide of linoleic acid at every sampling time was ob-
tained by deducting the initial concentration from measured
concentration. The change of concentration indicated the per-
oxide production of linoleic acid during oxidation.
octadecadienoic acid [13HPODE(c,t)]; 2: 13-hydroperoxy-9-trans,11-
trans-octadecadienoic acid [13HPODE(t,t)]; 3: 9-hydroperoxy-10-trans-
12-cis-octadecadienoic acid [9HPODE(t,c)]; 4: 9-hydroperoxy-10-
trans,12-trans-octadecadienoic acid [9HPODE(t,t)]; 5: 13-hydroxy-9-
cis,11-trans-octadecadienoic acid [13HODE(c,t)]; 6: 13-hydroxy-9-
trans,11-trans-octadecadienoic acid [13HODE(t,t)]; 7: 9-hydroxy-10-
trans,12-cis-octadecadienoic acid [9HODE(t,c)]; 8: 9-hydroxy-10-
trans,12-trans octadecadienoic acid [9HODE(t,t)].
Total production of hydroperoxides was obtained by sum-
ming all hydroperoxides. The rate (slope) of total production
JAOCS, Vol. 78, no. 6 (2001)