Please cite this article in press as: Gao et al., Copper-Catalyzed Highly Enantioselective Difluoroalkylation of Secondary Propargyl Sulfonates with
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Research Design
2
8–30
Transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis
would be a promising strategy to
construct diversified difluoroalkylated chiral center efficiently (Figure 1B). To date,
however, only rare examples of transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric fluoroalkylation
3
1,32
have been reported.
These methods either are limited to enantiomerically en-
32
3
1
riched substrates or only have moderate enantioselectivity. To overcome these
33–37
limitations, we sought to use copper-catalyzed propargylic substitution reaction
to construct the difluoroalkylated stereogenic center (Figure 1B), because alkynes
are ubiquitous in numerous bioactive molecules and natural products, and more essen-
tially, carbon-carbon triple bond can serve as a versatile functional group for various
3
8
transformations. In this copper-catalyzed process, one crucial issue is how to facilitate
the difluoroalkyl anion, a hard nucleophile, to attack the in-situ-generated g-electro-
philic copper-allenylidene intermediate, a soft electrophile. Difluoroalkyl anions are
generally unstable presumably due to the repulsion between carbon anion and the
lone pair of fluorine atoms; on the other hand, the strong electron-withdrawing effect
of the fluorine atom makes the difluorocarbon anion an even harder nucleophile than
its nonfluorinated counterpart. As a consequence, difluoroalkyl anions encounter diffi-
39
culty to react with soft electrophiles, such as activated carbon-carbon double bonds.
To solve this problem, we envisioned that the a-aroylation of difluoromethyl anion
would provide a more stable difluoroenolate and make it a softer nucleophile through
a p-p conjugation between the lone pair of the oxygen and p-system of carbon-carbon
double bond and aromatic ring (Figure 1B).
Optimization Study
Accordingly, propargylic ester 1a and carbonate 1b, two common substrates used
for copper-catalyzed asymmetric propargylation, were examined to react with
f
phenyl-substituted difluoroenoxysilane 2a in the presence of CuOT (10 mol %)
and Ph-PyBox L1 (12 mol %) (Table 1, entries 1 and 2; Table S1). However, the start-
ing material 2a was recovered in 93%–97% recovery, and no desired product 3a was
obtained. Propargyl sulfonate 1c was then employed for the reaction with the pre-
sent difluoroalkyl anion, providing 3a in 60% yield with a 68:32 enantiomeric ratio
(
er) (Table 1, entry 3). In contrast, a-silyldifluoroacetate 2b and a-silyldifluoroaceta-
mide 2c were not applicable to the reaction (Table 1, entries 4 and 5; Table S1), and
0
0
only protonated difluoroacetate 2b and difluoroacetamide 2c were obtained.
When TMSCF H was used, only starting materials were recovered (Table S1). These
2
observations clearly demonstrate that the conjugated aryl group on compound 2
promotes the reaction. Encouraged by these results, a survey of a series of reaction
parameters, such as solvent (Table S2), ligand (Table S3), and reaction temperature
(
Table S4) was conducted. The choice of solvent is critical to this reaction. Among the
tested solvents, DCE was the best reaction medium; other solvents, such as THF,
CH CN, and DMF essentially showed no activity (Table S2). PyBox ligands with
3
different substituents were also examined (Table S3). iPr-PyBox (L2) showed compa-
rable reactivity with L1 (Table 1, entry 6). But ligands L3 (Cy-PyBox) and -L4
1Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry,
Center for Excellence in Molecular Synthesis,
Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry,
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road,
Shanghai 200032, China
(
(
PhCH
2 2
CH -PyBox) led to no product (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). An increased er value
88:12) with 60% yield of 3a was obtained when L5 was used (Table 1, entry 9). How-
ever, further increasing the rigidity of the ligand and using L6 failed to improve the er
value (Table 1, entry 10). Increasing the steric hindrance of the difluoroenoxysilane
benefited the enantioselectivity. A higher er value of 92:8 with a lower yield (50%)
was obtained when difluoroenoxysilane 2d was used (Table 1, entry 11). The elec-
tronic nature of the aryl group on difluoroenoxysilane 2 also influenced the enantio-
2College of Chemistry, Henan Institute of
Advanced Techonology, Zhengzhou University,
Zhengzhou 450001, China
3Lead Contact
selectivity (Table S5). Aryl group bearing an electron-withdrawing substituent (CF
3
)
at its para-position led to a decreased er value (85:15; Table 1, entry 12). On the
2
Chem 5, 1–13, November 14, 2019