obtained in very high yield and soluble, active form. When
applied to the nitrilase used in this process, excellent re-
sults were obtained. The enzyme was obtained solely as a
soluble, active multimer in excess of 25 g L-1 of fermenta-
tion, a quantity that represented >50% of the total cell
protein. An added advantage of such a high level of
expression of protein is the greatly simplified downstream
processing of the enzyme, a further contributing factor to
the enzyme cost.
and 2.4 w/w% HGN (3.5% yield). No attempt is made to
remove residual cyanide since this can be part of the charge
in step 2.
Step 2: 3-Hydroxyglutaronitrile, 2. Water (855 g, 19.0
mol) and 30% aq sodium cyanide (408 g, 1.0 mol) are
charged to a reaction vessel having heating and cooling
control as previously described. Hydrochloric acid (35%) is
added (typically 15.6 g, 0.06 mol) to adjust to pH 10. This
solution is heated to and maintained at 50-55 °C whilst
charging the prepared CHBN solution (431 g, 1 mol
epichlorohydrin basis) over 4 h. The extent of reaction is
monitored by GC.9 The reaction is stirred out at 50-55 °C,
typically 6 h, until the yield maximum is achieved. Hydro-
chloric acid, (35% , 6.5 g, ∼0.025 mol) is added to adjust
to pH neutral. The dark reaction mixture, (1716 g, 1687 mL)
so obtained, contains ∼11.1% w/w 2; 68% yield based on
epichlorohydrin input.
Purification of 2. Aqueous reaction liquor (4.39 kg) was
extracted with 2-methylpropan-1-ol (4 × 1.6 L). The
combined organic layers were evaporated in vacuo (45 °C,
10 mmHg) to yield crude 2 as a brown liquid (390 g).
Purification was achieved by passing the liquid through a
wiped film evaporator and retaining the residue (jacket
temperature ) 96 °C; vacuum ) 1.4 mbar; throughput )
46 g h-1; jacket surface area ) 0.02 m2). Yield of residue
was 263 g (67% recovery) containing 2 at 91.2% purity (GC);
1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 4.25-4.33 (m, 1H), 2.65-2.80
(m, 4H).
Conclusion
An efficient three-stage synthesis of ethyl (R)-4-cyano-
3-hydroxybutyrate (1) from low-cost epichlorohydrin in
23% overall yield, 98.8% ee, and 97% purity has been
developed. Further scale-up will allow additional process
improvements to produce the optimum process. The key step
is the introduction of the chiral centre using a nitrilase-
catalysed desymmetrisation of 3-HGN. The nitrilase reac-
tion has been optimized to work at 3 M (330 g/L) sub-
strate concentration, pH 7.5, 27 °C. Under these conditions,
with an enzyme loading of 6 wt %, 100% conversion and
99% ee product is obtained in 16 h. The use of Pfejnex
Expression Technology to produce the enzyme for this
transformation allows a lower-cost supply of biocatalyst. All
of these factors allow a cost-efficient synthesis of a key chiral
building block.
Experimental Section
Preparation of (R)-4-Cyano-3-hydroxybutyric Acid
(3). To an aqueous solution of 100 mM NaH2PO4 at pH
7.5 (510 mL; adjusted to pH 7.5 by addition of 1 N so-
dium hydroxide solution) was added lyophilized nitrilase
enzyme powder (15.15 g). The mixture was stirred at
27 °C (to rehydrate the lyophilised enzyme powder) for
40 min. 3-Hydroxyglutaronitrile (252.5 g, 2.29 mol) was
then charged over ∼10 min. The mixture was stirred at
27 °C for 16 h and then cooled to 2 °C prior to acidifica-
tion by controlled addition of concentrated sulphuric acid
(∼56 mL) to give pH 2 (exotherm is observed). Celite
was charged (25 g) and the slurry filtered. The filtrate
was extracted with methyl ethyl ketone (4 × 400 mL).
The combined methyl ethyl ketone extracts were evap-
orated in vacuo (15 mbar, 40 °C) to yield the product 3 as
1
General Experimental Procedures. H NMR and 13C
NMR were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer
operating at 400 MHz for proton and 100 MHz for carbon.
Chemical shifts are reported in ppm using Me4Si or residual
nondeuterated solvent as reference. GC-MS data were
obtained using a HP 5890 series 2 GC fitted with a HP 5972
series Mass Selective Detector using electron impact ioniza-
tion.
Preparation of 3-Hydroxyglutaronitrile, (2). Caution!
Free HCN may be present at all stages of the following
process description. All work must be carried out in an
efficient fume cupboard. Waste streams should be rendered
cyanide free by treatment with base and formaldehyde or
hypochlorite. During step 1, exothermic activity should be
detected soon after the co-feeds have been initiated. Absence
of any exotherm indicates an accumulation of unreacted
materials which may lead to a subsequent uncontrollable
exotherm.
Step 1: 4-Chloro-3-hydroxybutyronitrile. Water (540
g, 2.5 mol), triethanolamine (44.7 g, 0.025 mol), and
tetrabutylammonium bromide (19.3 g, 0.005 mol) are pre-
mixed and charged to a reaction vessel fitted with a reflux
condenser and efficient stirring and temperature controls.
Hydrogen cyanide (356.4 g, 1.10 mol) and epichlorohydrin
(1110 g, 1 mol) are co-fed from separate feeds to the reaction
vessel over 4 h, maintaining the temperature at 45-50 °C.
The reaction is then allowed to stir out at this tempera-
ture for up to 8 h. The progress of the reaction is moni-
tored by GC.8 The resultant product (2070 g, 1680 mL) is a
yellow solution of typically 63.7 w/w% CHBN (92% yield)
1
a brown liquid (240.8 g, 81% yield; ee 98.8%); H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.25-4.34 (m, 1H), 2.50-2.77 (m,
4H).
Preparation of Ethyl (R)-4-Cyano-3-hydroxybutyrate
(1). 3 (239.5 g, 1.855 mol) was dissolved in absolute ethanol
(480 mL). Concentrated sulphuric acid (3.3 mL) was dosed
in (exotherm observed). The mixture was heated at reflux
(80 °C) for 1 h, after which time the reaction was found to
have stalled at ca. 90% conversion. The ethanol was
(8) GC assay: J&W-DB17 column; injector temperature, 250 °C; detector
temperature, 275 °C; carrier gas, He @ 0.95 kg/cm2; oven program: 75 °C
(hold 5 min), heat to 275 °C @ 10 °C/min, hold for 5 min; CHBN elutes
at 10.7 min.
(9) GC assay: J&W-DB17 column; injector temperature, 250 °C; detector
temperature, 275 °C; carrier gas, He @ 0.95 kg/cm2; oven program: 75 °C
(hold 5 min), heat to 275 °C @ 10 °C/min, hold for 5 min; CHBN elutes
at 10.7 min, HGN elutes at 14.5 min.
664
•
Vol. 10, No. 3, 2006 / Organic Process Research & Development