geminal vinylic hydrogens and consistent with published
NMR spectra of several closely related 2-methylenecyclo-
hexanones.11 Other resonances in the spectrum corresponded
to those expected for the tripeptide moiety.12 The resonance
at δ 7.12 indicated the presence of 2b, which was formed in
the transferase-independent addition of GSH to 3.
Besides providing insight into the mechanism of addition
of GSH to COMC, the formation of 3 enzymatically from
1b also offers an attractive alternative biological mechanism
for the tumoricidal activity of both COTC and COMC. It
may now be hypothesized that 1a and 1b are enzyme-
activated prodrugs in which the crotonate ester serves as a
leaving group, in a process triggered by glutathionyl trans-
ferase. Methylenecyclohexanones such as 3 are known to
be highly reactive Michael acceptors11 and can function as
carcinostatic agents by reacting with proteins and nucleic
acids critical to cell function. Besides the thiol adducts
documented here, covalent adducts between 1b and model
polynucleic acids in the presence of GSTP1-1 have been
detected by mass spectrometry.13
Comparative data analysis suggested that the potent
antitumor activities of COTC (1a) and COMC (1b) could
not be rationalized by the biological activity of 2a and 2b,
respectively, which are weak competitive inhibitors of human
erythrocyte GlxI. Earlier in vitro studies on enediol analogue
inhibitors of GlxI that inhibited the growth of L1210 and
B16 melanotic melanoma as ester prodrugs revealed Ki values
against GlxI in the submicromolar range.6 In fact, a direct
correlation was observed between the Ki values of the
prodrugs against GlxI and their corresponding antitumor
activities, as measured by IC50 values. For example, the
weakest GlxI inhibitor in that study (Ki ) 0.16 µM) displayed
an IC50 value >100 µM. On the basis of that correlation,
the potent antitumor activity of 1b (IC50 ) 0.5-19 µM) is
inconsistent with the hypothesis of Takeuchi et al. attributing
antitumor activity to the action of 2b as GlxI inhibitor (Ki
) 107 µM).1
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by
grants from the NIH (GM 24054 to B.G.; CA 59612 to
D.J.C.) and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material
Command (to D.J.C.). Support of the Cornell NMR Facility
has been provided by NSF and NIH.
Note Added after Print Publication: Due to a production
error, certain µM concentrations appeared as mM concentra-
tions in the version published on the Web 03/03/2002
(ASAP) and in the April 4, 2002 issue (Vol. 4, No. 7, pp
1209-1212); the correct electronic version of the paper was
published on 04/23/2002 and an Addition and Correction
appears in the May 16, 2002 issue (Vol. 4, No. 10).
(7) Huntley, C. F.; Hamilton, D. S.; Creighton, D. J.; Ganem, B. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 3143-3144.
(8) Rezgui, F.; El Gaied, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5965-5966.
(9) Hamilton, D. S.; Creighton, D. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 24933-
24936.
(10) Predominantly the pi or P1-1 isoform, purchased from Sigma
Chemical Company. Salts and free GSH were removed by ultrafiltration.
Units of transferase activity were determined using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitroben-
zene as substrate: Mannervik, B.; Danielson, U. H. Crit. ReV. Biochem.
1988, 23, 283-337.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
1
cedures and H and 13C NMR data for the synthesis of 1b.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
(11) Tamura, R., Watabe, K., Ono, N., Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 4895-4903.
OL025650H
(12) Rabenstein, D. L.; Keire, D. A. In Coenzymes and Cofactors:
Glutathione; Dolphin, D., Poulson, R., Avramovic, O., Eds,; John Wiley:
New York, 1989; Vol. 3, Part A, pp 67-101.
(13) Fabris, D.; Creighton D. J.; Ganem, B. Unpublished work.
1212
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 7, 2002