7836
R. Gatri, M. M. El Ga¨ıed / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7835–7836
Table 2. Baylis–Hillman reaction of enones 1 and 3 with aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes (10 mol% of imidazole as
catalyst)
Entry
n
Product
R
Temp. (°C)
Time (days)
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2b
2b
2c
2d
2e
4b
4c
4d
4e
Ph
Ph
rt
50
rt
50
50
50
rt
50
50
65
20
10
15
16
2
6
3
16
69
61
65
70
60
35
62
51
60
p-NO2Ph
Mea
s-Bu
Ph
p-NO2Ph
Mea
s-Bu
a Excess of acetaldehyde (10 equiv.) was used.
In order to investigate the scope and limitations of this
synthetic methodology, we examined, in the second
part of this study, the coupling reaction of enones 1 and
3 with a variety of aldehydes. Our preliminary attempts
were carried out using 2-cyclohexenone 1 and benzalde-
hyde, at room temperature, in the presence of 10 mol%
imidazole in aqueous THF. This coupling reaction took
a very long time (65 days) but led to the desired
compound 2b in 69% yield (Scheme 1, Table 2: entry 1).
Interestingly, by heating the reaction mixture, at 50 °C,
compound 2b was isolated after 20 days with only a
slight decrease in yield (61% yield) (Scheme 1, Table 2:
entry 2).
2. Rezgui, F.; El Ga¨ıed, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
5965.
3. Hwu, J. R.; Hakimelahi, G. H.; Chou, C.-T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 6469.
4. Basavaiah, D.; Krinshnamacharyulu, M.; Rao, A. J.
Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 2061.
5. (a) Kataoka, T.; Iwama, T.; Tsujiyama, S.; Iwamura, T.;
Watanabe, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 11813; (b) Iwama, T.;
Kinoshita, H.; Kataoka, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
3741.
6. Li, G.; Wei, H.; Gao, J. J.; Caputo, T. D. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 1.
7. Smith, A. B., III; Wexler, B. A.; Slade, J. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1980, 21, 3237.
8. (a) Smith, A. B., III; Branca, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 24, 7767; (b) Smith, A. B., III; Branca, S. J.; Pilla,
N. N.; Guaciaro, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1855.
9. Takao, I.; Kunimito, K.; Masanobu, S.; Kiyohiro, N.;
Takemitsu, N. Chem. Abstr. 1987, 106, 49660m.
10. Kabat, M. M.; Kiegel, N.; Cohen, K. T.; Wovkulich, P.
M.; Malmas, Uskokovic, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 118.
11. Preparation of 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-cyclopentenone 4a:
A 100 mL round-bottomed flask was charged with 2-
cyclopentenone 3 (4.9 g, 60 mmol), 30% aqueous formal-
dehyde (12 mL, 120 mmol), 12 mL of THF and imidazole
(0.4 g, 3 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred for 17
days at room temperature. When the reaction, followed
by TLC was finished, the mixture was acidified with
aqueous HCl (1.5 M) and extracted with methylene chlo-
ride. After the usual work up, chromatography of the
crude product on silica gel, using ether as eluent, gave
pure 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-cyclopentenone 4a8 in 86%
Finally, the reaction of enones 1 and 3 with activated
aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes was examined in the
presence of catalytic amounts of imidazole (10 mol%).
Therefore, the allylic alcohols 2c–e (Table 2: entries
3–5) and 4b–e (Table 2: entries 6–9) were prepared
under the experimental conditions described in Table 2.
In conclusion, we have developed a short and simple
procedure for the preparation of cyclic Baylis–Hillman
derivatives in moderate to good yields. Moreover, this
large-scale method, using imidazole as a catalyst, allows
both hydroxymethylation and hydroxyalkylation of
cyclic enones.
References
1
yield; IR (cm-1, CHCl3): 3450, 1690; H NMR (300 MHz,
1. (a) Baylis, A. B.; Hillman, M. E. D. German Patent
2,155,113, 1972; Chem. Abstr. 1972, 77, 341174q; (b)
Drews, S. E.; Roos, G. H. P. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 4653;
(c) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, P. D.; Hyma, R. S. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 8001; (d) Ciganec, E. Org. React. 1997, 51,
201.
CDCl3): 7.58 (m, 1H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 3.15 (br s, OH), 2.64
(m, 2H), 2.45 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
209.7, 159.3, 145.0, 56.7, 34.8, 26.6; MS (EI) m/z: 70 (54),
83 (42), 84 (31), 97 (16), 112 (M+, 100); HRMS calcd for
C6H8O2: 112.0524. Found: 112.0527.