Chemical Papers
(entries 6–8). The optimal molar ratio was 1:1.5 with the
highest conversion of 99.2%. The pseudo-IL amount was
also very important, which determined active sites amount.
The conversion increased with pseudo-IL amount due to
more active sites. However, the pseudo-IL could catalyze
both the forward and backward reactions. The conversion
decreased instead when the pseudo-IL amount increased to
0.7 g (entry 6). Therefore, the optimal reaction condition
was selected as entry 7.
1240 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS (m/z): 361, 259, 185, 129, 57,
41.
Entry 5, butyl lactate, boiling point: 185–186 °C; den-
sity: 0.984 g/mL; nD20: 1.421; IR(KBr): 3400 cm−1 (O–H),
2988 cm−1 and 2840 cm−1 (C–H), 1760 cm−1 (C=O),
1360 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS (m/z): 145, 85, 57, 45, 41, 29.
Entry 6, butyl benzoate, boiling point: 250 °C; den-
sity: 1.01 g/mL; n2D0: 1.498; IR(KBr): 3210 cm−1 (Ar–H),
2990 cm−1 and 2870 cm−1 (C–H), 1720 cm−1 (C=O),
1240 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS (m/z): 179, 123, 105, 77, 56,
51, 41, 29.
Then, various aliphatic acids were applied to investigate
the activity of the novel pseudo-IL (Table 2). The results
acid with three carboxyl acid groups showed high reactivity
with the conversion over 98% (entries 1–2). Furthermore,
the pseudo-IL could separate from the reaction mixture
automatically. The pseudo-IL dissolved in the reaction mix-
ture at high temperature during the reaction process, which
resulted in high activity. After reaction, the pseudo-IL sepa-
rated from the reaction mixture, which made the IL recov-
ery quite simple. Compared to butanol, propanol showed
a little lower conversion of 97.8% due to the lower refux-
ing temperature (entry 4). Besides the hydroxyl acids, the
aromatic acids were also investigated. Benzoic acid showed
lower conversion of 87.6% for the conjugation efect of the
aromatic ring (entry 6). The conversion further decreased to
84.3% when the electron-donating hydroxyl group attached
onto the aromatic ring (entry 7). The steric hindrance and
H bond were also the reasons for lower reactivity. Cinnamic
acid showed much higher conversion for the weaker conju-
gation efect and lower steric hindrance (entries 8, 9). For
long-carbon-chain fatty acids, the conversion was also high
(entries 10–13). The conversion decreased with the carbon
chain due to higher steric hindrance and lower acidity. As
to polar methanol, the conversion was quite low (entries 13,
14). The low boiling point of methanol greatly limited the
reaction temperature. The reaction carried out at 140 °C in
an autoclave gave the high conversion of 98.7%. Further-
more, the pseudo-IL dissolved in the reaction mixture due
to the high polarity of methanol, which caused the difculty
in the pseudo-IL separation. The novel pseudo-IL gave high
reusability in most reactions. The pseudo-IL separated from
the reaction mixture after cooling to room temperature with
the total the recycled yield over 90%. After recycling the
pseudo-IL catalysts, the reaction mixture was neutralized
using 5 wt% NaHCO3 aqueous solution to remove the unre-
acted acid reactants. The alcohols were removed using the
evaporation under reduced pressure. The isolated yields were
quite similar to the conversion, which further confrmed the
high activities of the pseudo-IL.
Entry 7, butyl salicylate, boiling point: 260 °C; den-
sity: 1.08 g/mL; n2D0: 1.512; IR(KBr): 3650 cm−1 (O–H),
3170 cm−1 (Ar–H), 2980 cm−1 and 2889 cm−1 (C–H),
1750 cm−1 (C=O), 1230 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS (m/z): 194,
138, 120, 92, 64, 41, 29.
Entry 11, butyl laurate, boiling point: 194 °C; density:
0.86 g/mL; n2D0: 1.435; IR(KBr): 2978 cm−1 and 2876 cm−1
(C–H), 1737 cm−1 (C=O), 1280 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS
(m/z): 258, 201, 183, 129, 116, 73, 56, 41, 29.
Entry 12, butyl stearate, boiling point: 223 °C; density:
0.86 g/mL; n2D0: 1.445; IR(KBr): 2925 cm−1 and 2854 cm−1
(C–H), 1740 cm−1 (C=O), 1244 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS
(m/z): 340, 285, 267, 185, 129, 116, 73, 56, 43, 29.
Entry 14, methyl stearate, boiling point: 181–182 °C
(533.2 Pa); density: 0.850 g/mL; n2D0: 1.436; IR(KBr):
2963 cm−1 and 2850 cm−1 (C–H), 1743 cm−1 (C=O),
1264 cm−1 (C–O); ESI–MS (m/z): 298, 267, 199, 143, 129,
87, 74, 55, 43, 29.
The catalytic activities for acetalization
Besides esterifcation, the acetalization was also performed
using the pseudo-IL catalyst (Table 3). All carbonyl com-
pounds were successfully transformed to acetals or ketals
with high yields. Aliphatic aldehydes were almost com-
pletely conversed under the reaction condition (entries
1–10). The reactivity decreased with the carbon chain due
to higher steric hindrance. For isobutyraldehyde, the yield
decreased to 98% with longer reaction time (entries 7, 8).
Cyclohexanone owned high yield for ketalization with dif-
ferent diols (entries 11–13). The carbonyl group in cyclohex-
anone was fxed by the ring, which made the nucleophilic
attack quite easily. Butanone gave relatively low yields for
high steric hindrance (entries 14–15). The aromatic alde-
hydes, such as benzaldehyde, could also be smoothly acetal-
ized with high yields (entries 16–23). The conjugation efect
of carbonyl groups and aromatic ring reduced the reactiv-
ity. Therefore, benzaldehyde showed relatively low yield of
94% (entry 18). The electron-donating methyl group fur-
ther decreased the eletrophilicity of carbonyl group, which
resulted in lower yield of 90% (entry 21). For p-chlorobenza-
ldehyde, the yield increased due to the electron-withdrawing
The characterization of selected compounds. Entry 1,
tributyl citrate, boiling point: 234 °C (17 mmHg); den-
sity: 1.043 g/mL; nD20: 1.445; IR(KBr): 3600 cm−1 (O–H),
2980 cm−1 and 2870 cm−1 (C–H), 1765 cm−1 (C=O),
1 3