G Model
CCLET 4793 No. of Pages 4
2
H. Zhang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
in water has not been studied in detail.
10 min. In addition, the uptrends of mFe/Cu-air-PS system was
higher the mFe/Cu-air and mFe/Cu-PS system. The phenomena
demonstrate that oxidization ability for PNP by mFe/Cu-based
system was elevated obviously by PS or aeration.
2
ꢁ
þFe ! Fe2þþ2SO þ 2SO4
0
2ꢁ
ꢀꢁ
2S
2
O
ð1Þ
8
4
Fig. 1b shows the effluent pH of different systems during the
60 min treatment. It is clear that the effluent pH of mFe/Cu-air-PS,
mFe-air-PS, mFe/Cu-PS, mFe/Cu-air, mFe/Cu systems dramatically
rose up to 9.5 at 10 min. However, the pH values of those systems
withPSsharplydroppedafter10 minandthenmildlydeclinedtoless
than 7.0 in the following process, while that of those two systems
without PS continued to creepup and eventuallyexceeded 10.5 after
2
Fe3 þFe ! 3Fe
þ
0
2þ
ð2Þ
ꢀ
ꢀꢁ
Therefore, to combine the benefits of OH and SO
4
generated
during Fenton-like and PS activated processes by mFe/Cu particles,
the mFe/Cu-air-PS system was proposed for treatment of PNP in
this work. Firstly, it is important to obtain the best performance for
mFe/Cu-air-PS system through optimizing its operational param-
eters. Meanwhile, the superiority of mFe/Cu-air-PS system would
be evaluated through control systems (i.e., mFe/Cu, air, PS, mFe/Cu-
air, mFe/Cu-PS, air-PS and mFe-air-PS). Furthermore, the degrada-
tion pathway of PNP in mFe/Cu-air-PS system was proposed by
analysis of COD, TOC, UV–vis spectra and HPLC chromatography.
Through analysis COD removal efficiency and pH variation of
effluent in mFe/Cu-air-PS system, the key operating parameters
10 min.Inaddition,Fig.1balsoshowsthattheeffluentpHofPS-air,PS
system decreased mildly from 5.4 to about 3.4 during the 60 min
treatment. The phenomenon could be explained from two aspects:
(
i) the processes of iron corrosion and Fenton-like reactions could
+
consume H ions and cause the increase of solution pH, (ii) the
decomposition ofPScouldreleaseH ions and causea decrease ofpH
+
values when PS was added reaction solution.
Meanwhile, when PS was added, there was evident different
between mFe/Cu-air-PS and mFe/Cu-PS system that the effluent pH
of the former was lower than that of the latter in the whole process,
and finallyitreached5.2and6.2after60 min, respectively. Theresult
supports the previous section of effect of aeration rate that the
effluent pH declined with an increase of air aeration rate in mFe/Cu-
air-PS system. However, inthe systems withoutPS, the effluent pHof
mFe/Cu system was higher than that of mFe/Cu-air system at first
(
i.e., aeration rate, TMLCu, mFe/Cu dosage, PS total dosage, the
feeding times of PS (N) and initial pH) were optimized. The optimal
conditions (i.e., TMLCu of 0.110 g Cu/g Fe, mFe/Cu dosage of 15 g/L,
PS total dosage of 15 mmol/L, N of 5, initial pH 5.4) were obtained
by the single-factor experiments (in the Supporting information).
To comparative study the superiority of mFe/Cu-air-PS system,
seven control systems including mFe/Cu, air, PS, mFe/Cu-air, mFe/
Cu-PS, air-PS and mFe-air-PS were set up under same conditions
within 60 min process. The performance of mFe/Cu-air-PS system
and control systems were investigated comparatively through
analyzing the COD removal efficiency, effluent pH, total iron ions
2
5 min and no longer increased andstayed around 10.5, whilethatof
mFe/Cu-air system rose continuously and exceeded mFe/Cu system
after 25 min and eventually maintained about 11.1 after 60 min
treatment. The results could be explained from two aspects: (i)
oxidizing capacity of PNP by mFe/Cu-air system was stronger than
mFe/Cu system, which benefited to generation of small molecule
organicacidsthatleadtothedecreaseofpH,andhenceitseffluentpH
was lower than thatof mFe/Cu system at first 25 min, (ii) airaeration
in mFe/Cu-air system would accelerate iron corrosion and Fenton-
like reactions which would consume acid in solution and generate
iron hydroxides, and hence cause higher effluent pH after 25min. In
conclusion, adding PS in reaction solution has an obvious impact on
effluent pH.
2
+
3+
concentration (i.e., Fe , Fe and flocculent precipitate) and UV–vis
spectra in different reaction systems.
As shown in Fig. 1a, the COD removal efficiency of 71.0%, 60.8%,
0.8%, 42.5%, 11.2%, 0%, 0%, 0% were obtained by mFe/Cu-air-PS,
5
mFe-air-PS, mFe/Cu-PS, mFe/Cu-air, mFe/Cu, PS-air, PS, air systems,
respectively. It can be concluded that PNP was rarely oxidized by PS
due to the limited oxidation capability of PS (E = 2.0 V). In addition,
it also could be found that PNP cannot be removed by air blowing.
Moreover, the COD removal obtained by mFe/Cu-air-PS system was
remarkably higher than those of seven control experiments during
u
Fig. 1c shows the variation of total iron ions (i.e., Fe2+, Fe3+ and
flocculent precipitate) concentration in reaction solution during
6
0 min treatment. It further confirms the capacity of oxidative
degradation of PNP by mFe/Cu-air-PS system was superior to other
seven control systems. Meanwhile, the COD removal efficiencies of
mFe/Cu-air-PS, mFe-air-PS, mFe/Cu-PS, mFe/Cu-air and mFe/Cu
system were about 8.0% at 10 min treatment, indicating that
oxidization ability for PNP by these systems was poor before
adding PS. However, it was obvious different when added PS after
6
0 min treatment process by the different systems. It presented
that the all total iron ions concentrations of mFe/Cu-air-PS system
were much higher than mFe/Cu-air, mFe/Cu, mFe-air-PS and mFe/
Cu-PS system during 60 min treatment. In addition, it is clear that
total iron ion concentration was lower than 335.0
0 min in each system, and it increased remarkably faster after
0 min for mFe/Cu-air-PS, mFe-air-PS and mFe/Cu-PS system, and
eventually rose up to 2051.0, 1800.9 and 1622.6 g/mL, respec-
tively. It also could be found that the total iron ion concentration in
mg/mL at first
1
1
1
0 min reaction. For instance, the uptrend of mFe/Cu system was
slowest in these systems, and the uptrend of mFe/Cu-air system
had clearly increased after 20 min, but the uptrends of mFe/Cu-PS,
mFe-air-PS and mFe/Cu-air-PS systems rose significantly after
m
Fig. 1. COD removal efficiency (a), effluent pH (b), total iron ion concentration (c) obtained by the different system during 60 min treatment ([PNP] = 500 mg/L, mFe/Cu
dosage = 15 g/L, mFe dosage = 15 g/L, PS dosage = 15 mmol/L, aeration rate = 1.0 L/min, initial solution pH 5.4).