2876
L. Dalla Via et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2874–2876
the spectra of DNA alone (line a) and in the presence of 3 (line b) at
[drug]/[DNA] = 0.04, obtained from flow dichroism experiments
performed as previously reported.17 The occurrence of a negative
dichroic signal at wavelengths at which the pyridazinopsoralen
chromophore absorbs (300–380 nm), also confirmed for derivative
3 the ability to intercalate between base pairs of the macromole-
cule and this property could account for the occurrence of the
UVA-independent cytotoxicity.
Skin phototoxicity was evaluated for compound 3 on depilated
skin in guinea pigs in comparison with 8-MOP (Table 1).17 Interest-
ingly, the pyridazinopsoralen derivative is significantly less photo-
toxic than the reference drug and this property acquires more
significance thanks to the evidenced difference in photocytotoxic-
ity between the two compounds.
Acknowledgments
Thanks the Spanish Ministry of Sanidad y Consumo (PI061457)
and Xunta de Galicia (PXIB20304PR) for partial financial support.
References and notes
1. Santana, L.; Uriarte, E.; Roleira, F.; Milhazes, N.; Borges, F. Curr. Med. Chem.
2004, 11, 3239.
2. Pathak, M. A.; Fitzpatrick, T. B. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1992, 14, 3.
3. Averbeck, D. Photochem. Photobiol. 1989, 50, 859.
4. Lowes, M. A.; Bowcock, A. M.; Krueger, J. G. Nature 2007, 445, 866.
5. Stern, R. S. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 44, 755.
6. Morison, W. L. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2004, 20, 315.
7. Stern, R. S. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 682.
8. Dalla Via, L.; Gia, O.; Marciani Magno, S.; Santana, L.; Teijeira, M.; Uriarte, E. J.
Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4405.
In conclusion, the new pyridazinopsoralen derivative 3 ap-
pears to be characterized by some peculiar biological properties.
Indeed, 3 is endowed with an interesting photobiological profile
deriving from both a significant photoantiproliferative activity
and a weak skin phototoxicity. Moreover, a significant cytotoxic
effect in the dark occurs. This capacity was also exhibited by the
benzo analogue,8 nevertheless the difference in the cytotoxicity
in the presence of UVA light and in the dark is less for 3. This
behavior can be attributed to an efficient DNA binding process
mediated by the pyridazine ring. This latter, thanks to the ten-
dency to protonation of its nitrogens,18,19 with respect to ben-
zene ring, can make the intercalative capacity between DNA
base pairs more suitable for the antiproliferative activity in the
dark.
A further contribution in DNA interaction ability can derive
from the insertion of the dimethylaminopropoxy side-chain. In-
deed, a cationic side-chain linked to a planar structure, can gener-
ate additional electrostatic interactions with the polyanionic DNA
target, hence favouring the binding process.20 Both the pyridazine
ring and the protonable side-chain can account for the significant
shift of the psoralen derivative 3 toward a dark antiproliferative
activity and actually indicate the possibility to modulate the
photo-dependent and -independent cellular effect by just modify-
ing suitably the intercalative arrangement of the tetracyclic psora-
len skeleton.
9. Dalla Via, L.; Uriarte, E.; Quezada, E.; Dolmella, A.; Ferlin, M. G.; Gia, O. J. Med.
Chem. 2003, 46, 3800.
10. Dalla Via, L.; Uriarte, E.; Santana, L.; Marciani Magno, S.; Gia, O. Arkivoc 2004, V,
131.
11. González-Gómez, J. C.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Synthesis 2002, 43.
12. González-Gómez, J. C.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8171.
13. González-Gómez, J. C.; Uriarte, E. Synlett 2003, 2225.
14. For leading references in Diels–Alder reaction of s-tetrazines see: (a) Lee, L.;
Snyder, J. K.. In Advances in Cycloadditions; Harmata, M., Ed.; JAI: Stamford, CT,
2001; Vol. 6, pp 119–171; (b) Boger, D. L. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1998, 35, 1001; (c)
Boger, D. L. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 33, 1519; (d) Boger, D. L.; Weinreb, S. M. In
Hetero Diels–Alder Methodology in Organic Synthesis; Wasserman, H. H., Ed.;
Academic: New York, 1987; Vol. 47, (e) Boger, D. L. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 781.
15. (a) For the preparation of 3,6-dichlorotetrazine, see: Schirmer, U.; Wuerzer, B.;
Meyer, N.; Neugebauer, F. A.; Fisher, H. Ger. Patent 35-08214-A1, 1986; Chem.
Abstr. 1987, 106, 45718; (b) In our hands 3,6-dichlorotetrazine was obtained in
68% yield (1.02 g) from 3,6-bisthiomethyltetrazine (1.74 g).
16. 6-(N,N-Dimethylaminopropyloxy)pyridazino[4,3-h]psoralen (3) 1H NMR
(CDCl3): 9.31 (d, J = 5.0, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 5.0, 1H), 7.86 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 9.6,
1H), 6.50 (d, J = 9.6), 4.70 (t, J = 6.3, 2H), 2.67 (m, 2H), 2.32 (s, 6H), 2.12 (m, 2H).
13C NMR (CDCl3): 166.2, 158.9, 148.3, 147.6 (CH), 143.0 (CH), 132.7, 120.8, 119.2
(CH), 118.1, 117.3, 116.1 (CH), 115.6 (CH), 72.8 (CþH2), 55.9 (CH2), 45.5 (CH3), 28.2
(CH2). HRMS (EI) found 339.1229, C18H17ClN3O4 requires 339.1219.
17. Dalla Via, L.; Mammi, S.; Uriarte, E.; Santana, L.; Lampronti, I.; Gambari, R.; Gia,
O. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4317.
18. Adams, A. Med. Chem. Rev. 2004, 1, 405.
19. Neidle, S. Nucleic Acid Structure and Recognition; Oxford University Press:
Oxford, 2002. 100.
20. Pons, M.; Campayo, L.; Martinez-Balbas, M. A.; Azorin, F.; Navarro, P.; Giralt, E.
J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 82.