Multiphase Catalysis
FULL PAPER
5
0 g). The reaction mixture was heated to 408C and the aqueous solution
ꢀ
1
of the substrate (20 mL, 0.2 molL ) was added to the autoclave. The re-
action was started by stirring at 1000 rpm, at which a highly disperse
scCO /water mixture is formed rapidly. Samples of the reaction mixture
2
2
6
Semi-continuous hydrogenation: 3-H F TPP (217.2 mg, 0,167 mmol) and
Rh(cod) ]BF (10.9 mg, 0,027 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane
3 mL). This solution was transferred into a 35 mL window-equipped au-
toclave (Tmax =1208C; pmax =400 bar) and the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The reactor was pressurised with H (40 bar), and
[
(
A
T
E
N
2
4
(
ꢂ0.5 mL) were withdrawn periodically from a needle valve placed at
the bottom of the reactor. The stirrer was switched off during sampling
to allow for complete phase separation. The products were isolated
simply by removing the water under reduced pressure and the conversion
2
heated to 558C. An aqueous solution of itaconic acid (15 mL,
.1 molL ) was added. The reactor was then filled with CO
pressure of 260 bar was reached. The reaction was started by stirring
500 rpm). Every thirty minutes the stirrer was turned off and 5 mL of
the water phase was withdrawn and replaced with the same volume of
fresh substrate solution. The pressure was readjusted to the initial value
ꢀ1
0
2
until a total
1
was determined by H NMR spectroscopy. The recovery of the substrate/
product mixture from the autoclave ranged from 85 to 90%. The repeti-
tive batch experiments were carried out by removing the water phase
completely and exchanging it with a substrate solution using a HPLC
pump.
(
2
by addition of CO . The hydrogen consumption was considered as negli-
Simplex optimisation: the conversion of 1 was defined as the target for
gible. The reaction was restarted by stirring. Quantification was carried
out as described above for batch experiments.
the optimisation sequence. The amount of CO
the H
ble parameters [Eq. (1)].
2
, the reaction temperature,
2
pressure and the ligand-to-rhodium ratio were chosen as the varia-
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢂꢃ
nðLÞ
c ¼ f mðCO
2
Þ,T,pðH
2
Þ,
ð1Þ
nðRhÞ
Acknowledgements
We thank the team of Prof. Dr. A. Behr (University of Dortmund) for
the ICP measurements. Financial support from the BMBF (ConNeCat
light house project “Regulated Systems for Multiphase Catalysis,
ꢀ
1
The amount of itaconic acid (4 mmol, 0.2 molL ) and of rhodium pre-
cursor (5 mol%), stirring speed (1000 rpm) and reaction time (30 min)
were kept constant throughout the optimisation study. To calculate the
starting simplex, the initial conditions and the interval for each variable
have been set (Table 5). By using Equation (2) and the kF values accord-
0
5
3C0338D), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 380 and SFB
40), and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie are gratefully acknowl-
edged.
Table 5. Starting conditions of the simplex optimisation.
[
[
1] Multiphase Homogeneous Catalysis (Eds.: B. Cornils, W. A. Herr-
mann, D. Vogt, I. Horvath, H. Olivier-Bourbigon, W. Leitner, S.
Mecking), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
2] B. Cornils, J. Falbe, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium
on Homogeneous Catalysis, Leningrad 1984, 487; G. Kessen, B. Cor-
nils, J. Hibbel, H. Bach, W. Gick, EP-0216151, 1986 (Hoechst AG).
C. W. Kohlpaintner, R. W. Fischer, B. Cornils, Appl. Catal .A 2001,
Parameter
(CO ) [g]
T [8C]
L/Rh
X
0
DX
m
A
C
H
T
R
E
U
N
G
2
50
40
5
10
20
1
p(H
2
) [bar]
30
10
2
21, 219.
[
[
[
3] Aqueous-Phase Organometallic Catalysis (Eds.: B. Cornils, W. A.
Herrmann), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004.
4] Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical Fluids, (Eds.: P. G. Jessop, W.
Leitner), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
5] P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 475; W.
Leitner, Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 746.
Table 6. Values of kF of the simplex optimisation.
Entry
kF value for
m
A
C
H
T
R
E
U
N
G
(CO
2
)
T
L/Rh
2
p(H )
1
2
3
4
5
0
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.05
0
[6] P. Licence, J. Ke, M. Sokolova, S. K. Ross, M. Poliakoff, Green
Chem. 2003, 5, 99; see also http://www.thomas-swan.co.uk.
[7] W. Leitner in Handbook of Homogeneous Hydrogenation, Vol. 3
(Eds.: J. G. de Vries, C. J. Elsevier), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007,
p. 1361.
0.87
0.29
0.29
0
0.82
0.20
0
0.79
[
8] Hydrogenation: R. A. Brown, P. Pollet, E. McKoon, C. A. Eckert,
C. L. Liotta, P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1254; M. Sol-
inas, A. Pfaltz, P. G. Cozzi, W. Leitner J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
ing to the algorithm shown in Table 6, the first five working points were
calculated.
1
6142; D. J. Heldebrant, P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
5
600.
X
i
¼ X
o
þ ðkF DXÞ
ð2Þ
[
9] Other reactions: M. F. Sellin, P. B. Webb, D. J. Cole-Hamilton,
Chem. Commun. 2001, 781; P. B. Webb, M. F. Sellin, T. E. Kunene, S.
Williamson, A. M. Z. Slawin, D. J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 15577; A. Bçsmann, G. Franciò, E. Janssen, M. Soli-
nas, W. Leitner, P. Wasserscheid, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2769;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2697; Z. S. Hou, B. X. Han, L. Gao,
T. Jiang, Z. M. Liu, Y. H. Chang, X. G. Zhang, J. He, New J. Chem.
2002, 26, 1246; D. Ballivet-Tkatchenko, M. Picquet, M. Solinas, G.
Franciò, P. Wasserscheid, W. Leitner Green Chem. 2003, 5, 232; Z.
Hou, N. Theyssen, A. Brinkmann, W. Leitner, Angew. Chem. 2005,
The obtained results were then listed in descending order relative to the
conversion and the barycentre of the best four experiments is calculated
according to Equation (3).
!
1
4
!
!
!
!
S
a,b,c,d
¼
ð a þ b þ c þ d Þ
ð3Þ
1
17, 1370; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1346; A. Serbanovic,
The following experiment was calculated [Eq. (4)] by reflection of the
point of lowest conversion onto the barycentre calculated before
L. C. Branco, M. N. da Ponte, C. A. M. Afonso, J. Organomet.
Chem. 2005, 690, 3600; L. C. Branco, A. Serbanovic, M. N. da Ponte,
C. A. M. Afonso, Chem. Commun. 2005, 107; M. T. Reetz, W. Wie-
senhçfer, G. Franciò, W. Leitner, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1221.
X
new ¼ 2Sa,b,c,dꢀe
ð4Þ
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2798 – 2804
ꢁ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2803