C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
be carried out to determine the longevity of the label and any long-
term effects on cellular function.
In summary, we have prepared three new MR contrast agents
with varying numbers of Gd(III) complexes via click chemistry.
This inexpensive and facile synthesis results in contrast agents with
increased relaxivity and good biocompatibility. The agents are
monodispersed and have relatively low molecular weights. We have
demonstrated that these agents do not affect cellular viability in
culture and are able to effectively label cells as observed in acquired
MR images.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by Center of
Excellence in Translational Human Stem Cell Research, 1P50
NS054287-01 and NIH grant 1RO1 EB005866-01. MR Imaging was
performed on instruments supported by NIH/NCRR Grant S10
RR15685-01.
Figure 2. (A) T1 weighted spin-echo MR phantom images of DOTA-
Gd, 4, 5, and 6 in Millipore water at equal molar concentration of each
contrast agent. Images were acquired at 4.7 T at 25 °C (TR/TE ) 300/18.4
ms). Concentrations (from left to right): 62, 51, 37, 21, 7, 0 µM. (B) T1
weighted spin-echo images of pelleted NIH-3T3 cells incubated with
DOTA-Gd, 5, and 6 at approximately equal molar concentrations of Gd(III)
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) Voisin, P.; Ribot, E. J.; Miraux, S.; Bouzier-Sore, A.-K.; Lahitte, J.-F.;
Bouchaud, V.; Mornet, S.; Thiaudiere, E.; Franconi, J.-M.; Raison, L.;
Labrugere, C.; Delville, M.-H. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 1053–1063.
2) Frullano, L.; Meade, T. J. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 12, 939–949.
3) Modo, M. M., Bulte, J. W. W., Eds. Molecular and Cellular MR Imaging;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2007.
(
4
0, 7.60, 7.6, and 8.3 mM Gd(III), respectively). Images were acquired at
.7 T at 25 °C (TR/TE ) 500/12.5). Each sample diameter is 1 mm.
(
(
5
, and 6 in water as indicated in Figure 2A. T
1
weighted spin-echo
(4) Merbach, A. E., Toth, E., Eds. The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical
images were obtained.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1st ed.; Wiley: New York, 2001.
(
5) Recent reports cite NSF toxicity exclusively in patients with renal failure
with one class of DTPA Gd(III) chelate and has prompted studies validating
the in vivo stability and safety of Gd(III) agents: (a) Kurtkoti, J.; Snow,
T.; Hiremagalur, B. Nephrology 2008, 13, 235–241. (b) Dillman, J. R.;
Ellis, J. H.; Cohan, R. H.; Strouse, P. J.; Jan, S. C. Am. J. Roentgenol.
Cell labeling studies were carried out using 5 and 6 due to their
high molecular relaxivities. NIH-3T3 cells were incubated with
DOTA-Gd, 5, and 6 at approximately equal molar concentration
of Gd(III). Normalizing the incubation concentration of the agents
according to the Gd(III) ion was done to accurately demonstrate
the efficacy of our new agents as cellular labels. Cells were
2
007, 189, 1533–1538.
(6) Sharma, V.; Luker Gary, D.; Piwnica-Worms, D. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
2
002, 16, 336–351.
(
7) Zhang, J.; Campbell, R. E.; Ting, A. Y.; Tsien, R. Y. Nat. ReV. Mol. Cell
Biol. 2002, 3, 906–918.
2
incubated for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO in complete media
(
8) Crich, S. G.; Biancone, L.; Cantaluppi, V.; Duo, D.; Esposito, G.; Russo,
S.; Camusi, G.; Aime, S. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004, 51, 938–944.
containing DOTA-Gd, 5, or 6. The cells were rinsed three times in
phosphate buffered saline and pelleted in 1 mm capillary tubes.
Cell phantom images were acquired on the 4.7 T system described
above with an unlabeled cell pellet as a control. The images clearly
show that cells labeled with 5 and 6 display a brighter image than
with DOTA-Gd at approximately the same incubation concentration
of Gd(III) (Figure 2B).
(9) Brekke, C.; Morgan, S. C.; Lowe, A. S.; Meade, T. J.; Price, J.; Williams,
S. C. R.; Modo, M. NMR Biomed. 2007, 20, 77–89.
(
10) Anderson, E. A.; Isaacman, S.; Peabody, D. S.; Wang, E. Y.; Canary, J. W.;
Kirshenbaum, K. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 1160–1164.
(
11) Hooker, J. M.; Datta, A.; Botta, M.; Raymond, K. N.; Francis, M. B. Nano
Lett. 2007, 7, 2207–2210.
(12) Hueber, M. M.; Staubli, A. B.; Kustedjo, K.; Gray, M. H. B.; Shih, J.;
Fraser, S. E.; Jacobs, R. E.; Meade, T. J. Bioconjugate Chem. 1998, 9,
2
42–249.
A number of factors influence the observed signal intensity in
cell imaging, including relaxivity, intracellular concentration, and
(13) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599.
(
(
(
(
14) Zhang, Z.; Greenfield, M. T.; Spiller, M.; Mcmurry, T. J.; Lauffer, R. B.;
Caravan, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6766–6769.
15) Nicolle, G. M.; Toth, E.; Schmitt-Willich, H.; Raduchel, B.; Merbach, A. E.
Chem.—Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1040–1048.
23
subcellular localization. To evaluate the uptake of 5 and 6 in NIH-
T3 cells, MR images of cell pellets were acquired. The Gd(III)
3
content in these cells was quantified by ICP-MS. Cells were
incubated with increasing concentrations of Gd(III) using each
16) Barge, A.; Cravotto, G.; Robaldo, B.; Gianolio, E.; Aime, S. J. Inclusion
Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2007, 57, 489–495.
17) Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Terreno, E.; Menegotto, I.; Bracco, C.; Milone, L.;
Cravotto, G. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2003, 41, 800–805.
contrast agent in complete media for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO
see Supporting Information). A linear concentration-dependent
2
(
(18) Prasuhn, D. E., Jr.; Yeh, R. M.; Obenaus, A.; Manchester, M.; Finn, M. G.
Chem. Commun. 2007, 126, 9–71.
uptake profile was observed for all three agents. The concentrations
of Gd(III) in cells labeled with each agent were slightly different
but of the same order of magnitude. The uptake mechanism and
the subcellular localization of the agents are under investigation.
Furthermore, the biocompatibility of DOTA-Gd, 5, and 6 was
examined. Cellular viability assays indicated that a very high
percentage of NIH-3T3 cells survived after incubation with DOTA-
Gd, 5, or 6 (see Supporting Information). Future investigation will
(
19) Viguier, R. F. H.; Hulme, A. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11370–
11371.
(
(
20) Smith, S. V. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004, 98, 1874–1901.
21) Gilbert, E. E.; Voreck, W. E. Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 1989, 14,
19–23.
(
22) Rohrer, M.; Bauer, H.; Mintorovitch, J.; Requardt, M.; Weinmann, H.-J.
InVest. Radiol. 2005, 40, 715–724.
(23) Terreno, E.; Crich, S. G.; Belfiore, S.; Biancone, L.; Cabella, C.; Esposito,
G.; Manazza, A. D.; Aime, S. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006, 55, 491–497.
JA0777990
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 130, NO. 21, 2008 6663