D
I. R. Ramazanov et al.
Letter
Synlett
2, the ease of hydrogen transfer from the tertiary carbon
atom should be determined by (а) stability of the iminium
salt thus formed; (b) lower steric hindrance in the transi-
tion state leading to intermediate B. According to B3LYP/6-
31G(d,p) calculations, the relative free energy of the formation
of the iminium salt from amine increases in the series
of amines: N,N-dimethyl-1-phenylethan-1-amine (–3.91
References and Notes
(1) Negishi, E.-i. ARKIVOC 2011, (viii), 34.
(2) Dzhemilev, U. M.; D’yakonov, V. A. Modern Organoaluminum
Reagents, in Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 41;
Woodward, S.; Dagorne, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg,
2013, 215.
(3) Negishi, E. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 80, 233.
(4) Ramazanov, I. R.; Kadikova, R. N.; Dzhemilev, U. M. Russ. Chem.
Bull. 2011, 60, 99.
kcal/mol)
<
N,N-dimethylcyclohexanamine
(–1.85
kcal/mol) < N,N-dimethylpropan-2-amine (0 kcal/mol). The
higher capability of the isopropyl group for hydrogen atom
transfer compared with the cyclohexyl group can be due to
steric factors. A more intricate issue is the lack of reactivity
of N-cyclohexyl-N-(non-2-yn-1-yl)cyclohexanamine under
the reaction conditions as compared with the reactive N-
isopropyl-N-(non-2-yn-1-yl)cyclohexanamine. According
B3LYP/6-31G(d)/LanL2DZ calculations, the activation barri-
er of the hydride transfer step in the case of N-cyclohexyl-
N-(non-2-yn-1-yl)cyclohexanamine is 5.8 kcal/mol. This
represents a slight difference from the value calculated for
the diisopropyl derivative (4.7 kcal/mol), but it may be
somewhat underestimated because insufficient account
was taken of the steric interactions of the two bulk cyclo-
hexyl groups.
(5) Wang, G.; Zhu, G.; Negishi, E.-i. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692,
4731.
(6) Rand, C. L.; Van Horn, D. E.; Moore, M. W.; Negishi, E. J. Org.
Chem. 1981, 46, 4093.
(7) Khanna, A.; Maung, C.; Johnson, K. R.; Luong, T. T.; Van Vranken,
D. L. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3233.
(8) Giannini, U.; Brückner, G.; Pellino, E.; Cassata, A. J. Polym. Sci.,
Part C 1968, 22, 157.
(9) Giannini, U.; Brückner, G.; Pellino, E.; Cassata, A. J. Polym. Sci.,
Part B : Polym. Lett. 1967, 5, 527.
(10) Chung, T. C. In Functionalization of Polyolefins; Academic Press:
San Diego, 2002, 39.
(11) Bochmann, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 255.
(12) Yoshida, T.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4985.
(13) Wipf, P.; Lim, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1068.
(14) Negishi, E.; Van Horn, D. E.; Yoshida, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
107, 6639.
In summary, the unusual transformation of N-isoalkyl-
substituted propargylamines into alkenylamines under the
action of Cp2ZrCl2and organoaluminum compounds (Me3Al,
EtAlCl2) was first observed. According to proposed plausible
mechanism of the conversion, N-isoalkyl-substituted prop-
argylamines undergo zirconocene-initiated intramolecular
hydride transfer that was confirmed by B3LYP/6-
31G(d)/LanL2DZ calculations. Obviously, one of the most
important factors of the transformation is the presence of
negative hyperconjugation of lone pair of nitrogen atom
and antibonding orbitals σ*CH located at the isoalkyl group.
(15) (E)-2-d-N-Isopropyloct-2-en-1-amine (1a)To a 25 mL, argon-
swept flask, equipped with a magnetic stirrer and rubber
septum, was added Cp2ZrCl2 (585 mg, 2 mmol) suspended in
CH2Cl2 (5 mL) and Me3Al (0.38 mL, 4 mmol; caution: organoalu-
minums are pyrophoric and can ignite on contact with air,
water or any oxidizer!) at room temperature. To the solution
was added N,N-diisopropyloct-2-yn-1-amine (418 mg, 2 mmol)
at room temperature and stirred for 3 h at 40 °C. Then, the reac-
tion mixture was diluted with with hexane (5 mL), and D2O (3
mL) was added dropwise while cooling the reactor flask in an
ice bath. The precipitate was filtered on a filter paper. The
aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL). The
combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried
over anhydrous CaCl2. Evaporation of solvent and purification of
the residue by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate,
5:1) gave a colourless oil; yield 279 mg (82%); Rf = 0.8 (hex-
ane/ethyl acetate, 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.85 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 3 Н, С(11)Н3), 1.02 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 6 Н, С(5,6)Н3), 1.17–
1.30 (m, 4 Н, С(9,10)Н2), 1.30–1.37 (m, 2 Н, С(8)Н2), 1.98 (q, J =
7.1 Hz, 2 Н, С(7)Н2), 2.74–2.83 (m, 1 Н, С(4)Н1), 3.14 (s, 2 Н,
С(1)Н2), 5.45–5.60 (m, 1 Н, С(3)Н1). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 13.97 (C(11)), 22.47 and 31.35 (C(9) and C(10)), 22.88 (2 C,
С(5,6)), 28.93 (C(8)), 32.25 (С(7)), 47.99 (С(4)), 49.30 (C(1)),
Funding Information
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Re-
search (Grant No. 18-03-00817 and 16-33-60167) and by Grant of the
RF President (Sci. Sh.–6651.2016.3).
R
u
asin
F
o
u
n
d
oaitn
o
f
r
Bacsi
Research
1(8-03-0
0
8
1
7
R)
u
asni
F
o
u
n
d
oaitn
o
f
r
Bacsi
Research
1(6-33-6
0
1
6
7)
Acknowledgment
The authors are indebted to Prof. Tamotsu Takahashi (Catalysis Re-
search Center, Hokkaido University) for useful discussions especially
concerning the mechanism of the unusual transformation. We ac-
knowledge the Center of collective use of the unique equipment
‘Agidel’ at the Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of the Russian
Academy of Sciences.
1
128.08 (t, JCD =18.5 Hz, C(2)), 132.34 (С(3)). MS (EI): m/z (%) =
170 (4) [М]+, 155 (22), 141 (<1), 127 (2), 111 (8), 99 (12), 82 (7),
69 (31), 44 (100), 41 (21). Anal. Calcd (%) for C11H22DN: C, 77.57;
N, 8.22. Found: C, 77.7; N, 8.3.
(16) Papirer, E. In Surfactant Science Series;
9
0Vo.
l
Marcel Dekker: New
York, 2000, 690.
(17) Meerwein, H.; Allendörfer, H.; Beekmann, P.; Kunert, F.;
Morschel, H.; Pawellek, F.; Wunderlich, K. Angew. Chem. 1958,
70, 211.
Supporting Information
(18) Kaitmazova, G. S.; Gambaryan, N. P.; Rokhlin, E. M. Russ. Chem.
Rev. 1989, 58, 1145.
Supporting information for this article is available online at
S
u
p
p
ortioInfgrmoaitn
S
u
p
p
ortiInfogrmoaitn
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York — Synlett 2018, 29, A–D