a
Table 2 Investigation of (I) temperature, (II) pressure and (III) molar ratio on yield of 3
Flow rate
Production
rate of
3/g min
Molar ratio of 1 + 6/
Foundb
3 (%)
Yieldc
of 3 (%)
21
21
of 1:6
g min
Tcat/°C
2
p CO /bar
I
2.0:1.0
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
1.51
0.60
0.52
200
230
250
270
300
250
250
250
250
250
250
200
200
200
200
200
200
150
100
150
150
150
15.0
21.0
21.0
15.0
7.5
21.0
18.5
16.0
19.0d
18.5
10.0
30.0
42.0
42.0
30.0
15.0
42.0
37.0
32.0
19.0d
37.0
50.0
0.09
0.13
0.13
0.09
0.05
0.13
0.11
0.10
0.29
0.11
0.05
2.0:1.0
2.0:1.0
2.0:1.0
2.0:1.0
II
2.0:1.0
2
2
.0:1.0
.0:1.0
III
1.0:5.0
2
5
.0:1.0
.0:1.0
a
(0.65 l min21) with 3 as the only detectable product. b Product analysis was by H NMR spectroscopy (CDCl
1
). c Based
All reactions carried out in scCO
2
3
d
on the amount of 6 in the initial reaction mixture. Yield based on 1. In addition, 3% of 4 and traces of side-products were found.
OMe
thank M. W. George, M. Guyler, S. M. Howdle, K.-H. Pickel,
K. Stanley, T. Tacke and S. Wieland for their help. M. P. thanks
the EPSRC/Royal Academy of Engineering for a Fellowship.
+
OH
7
6
Notes and References
acid–Deloxan®
scCO2, –H2O
†
‡
Web page: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/supercritical/
Deloxan® ASP catalysts (ref. 11) are specially designed polysiloxane
OMe
OMe
OMe
based solid acids, formed by sol-gel condensation of alkyl sulfonic acid
functionalized organosilane monomers, e.g. HO SCH CH CH Si(OH)
which overcome the drawbacks of organic polymers by virtue of their inert
matrix material and excellent compatability with almost all organic
solvents. The sol-gel process yields products with a relatively narrow
particle size distribution, high porosity, large pore diameters ( > 20 nm) and
3
2
2
2
3
,
+
+
Pri
Pri2
Pri3
8
9
10
Scheme 2
2
21
high BET surface areas (300–600 m g ).
The substrate, reactant and supercritical fluid are brought together in a
when the catalyst was conditioned with water for 30 min prior
to use. When operated for maximum flow of 3 (see Table 2) the
catalyst can produce twice its volume of 3 per hour.
The supercritical reactor can also be applied sucessfully to
the continous alkylation of anisole 7 by scPropene 2 or by
§
heated mixer, passed through the hot reactor (10 ml volume; 9 mm i.d.,
length 152 mm) containing the catalyst, and then expanded to separate the
product from the fluid. The reactor is assembled from commercially
available units: scCO and scPropene pump PM 101 and Expansion Module
2
propan-2-ol 6 in scCO
2
(Scheme 2). As with the alkylation of 1,
PE 103 (all from NWA GmbH, L o¨ rrach, Germany), a high pressure mixer
(Medimix) and Gilson pumps 303, 305 (for substrate and reactant).
SAFETY NOTE: Reactions in supercritical fluids involve high pressures
and should only be carried out with appropriate equipment.
there is significant selectivity in favour of the mono-alkylated
product. Thus, 6 reacted with 7 at a molar ratio of 1.0:3.0 to
form isomers of 8 (30% yield) and 9 (only 6% yield).∑ No
further products could be detected by GC–MS. When 7 was
1
¶
Product analysis by GC–MS or H NMR spectroscopy.
∑
Pressure, 220 bar; catalyst temperature, 200 °C, flow rate of gaseous CO
2
2
1
alkylated at a flow rate of 0.2 ml min with scPropene (flow
2
1
21
of 0.2 l min ; total flow rate of 6 + 7, 1.0 ml min . The product analysis
is more complicated for the reactions of 7 than for those of 1 becasue the
products (8, 9 and 10) all have more than one possible isomer. Thus, GC–
MS gave three peaks for 8 (m/z 150) in the ratio of 13 :12:1, corresponding
to the ortho, para and meta isomers. Similarly, two peaks (m/z 192) were
found in the ratio 4:1 for the isomers of 9.
2
1
rate of gaseous propene: 0.43 l min ) under the same
conditions, the yield of 8 was 38% with the same isomer ratio as
was found with propan-2-ol.∑ However, the yield of 9 increased
to 18% (three isomers at a ratio of 5:2:1). In addition, 10 was
found in 5% yield (peak ratio 5:2 at a mass of 234) as well as
trace amounts (3%) of propene di- and tri-mers.
The supercritical fluid probably plays several roles in these
reactions. Compared to liquid phase reactions, the fluid reduces
mass transport restrictions at the surface of the catalyst.
Compared to a gas phase reaction, it increases the density of the
reaction medium and hence increases the residence time of the
substrate in a given size of reactor. This allows continuous
alkylation to be caried out on a reasonable scale in a small
reactor. Finally, it may reduce coking of the catalyst preventing
premature deactivation of the catalytic sites.
This investigation has shown that aromatic substrates can
undergo continuous and sustainable Friedel–Crafts alkylation in
supercritical fluid solution over solid acid heterogeneous
catalysts.Thereactionscanbecarriedoutinaflowreactor,which
differs only in the peripheral pipework from that used for the
supercritical hydrogenation of organic compounds.10 The
method of alkylation has features of potential importance for the
manufactureoffinechemicals.Itisselective,organicsolventsare
eliminated and a clean heterogeneous catalyst replaces a liquid–
based system. Thus, supercritical alkylation is a step closer to
ennvironmentally acceptable Friedel–Crafts chemistry.
1 G. A. Olah, Friedel–Crafts and Related Reactions, Wiley Interscience,
New York and London, 1963–1964, vol. I–IV; G. A. Olah, R. Krishna-
muri and G. K. Surya Prakash, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed.
B. M. Trost, Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, vol. 3, ch. 1.8.
2
J. H. Clark and D. J. Macquarrie, Org. Proc. Res. Develop., 1997, 1,
49.
1
3
4
R. Streekumar and R. Padmakumar, Synth. Commun., 1997, 27, 781.
M. Y. Croft, E. J. Murphy and R. J. Wells, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66,
4
459.
5
Y. Gao, Z. N. Zhu and W. K. Yuan, Prog. Nat. Sci., 1996, 6, 625.
6 M. Kodomari, Y. Suzuki and K. Yoshida, Chem. Commun., 1997,
1567.
7 L. Fan, I. Nakamura, S. Ishida and K. Fujimoto, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
1
997, 36, 1458 and references cited therein.
8
9
J. S. Beck and W. O. Haag, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, ed.
G. Ertl, H. Kn o¨ zinger and J. Weitmap, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997,
vol. 5, p. 2123.
P. Tundo, Continuous Flow Methods in Organic Synthesis, Ellis
Horwood, 1991.
1
0 M. G. Hitzler and M. Poliakoff, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1667;
M. G. Hitzler, F. R. Smail, S. K. Ross and M. Poliakoff, Org. Proc. Res.
Develop., 1998, in the press.
11 S. Wieland, E. Auer, A. Freund, H. Lansink Rotgerink and P. Panster,
in Catalysis of Organic Reactions, ed. R. E. Malz, Jr., Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1996, pp. 277–286.
We thank Thomas Swan & Co Ltd for fully funding this work
and D. Campbell, S. K. Ross and J. C. Toler for their assistance.
We are grateful to Degussa AG for donating the catalysts. We
Received in Liverpool, UK, 1st October 1997; 7/07149C
360
Chem. Commun., 1998