176
W.C. Kett et al. / Carbohydrate Research 329 (2000) 169–177
added and incubated at rt overnight. After
drying in a centrifugal evaporator, 0.5 mL of
toluene was added, and the samples were re-
evaporated. The residue was dissolved in wa-
ter (200 mL), and an aliquot (50 mL, 350 nmol)
was taken for conversion to the azopyrazolone
derivative and HPLC analysis in the manner
described for the estimation of yield (above).
grammed to dilute an aliquot of this sample at
intervals, immediately prior to analysis.
Aliquots (10 mL) were added to water (1.0
mL) and mixed, and 10-mL samples were in-
jected. Analysis was performed using PGC as
described above for lactosylpyrazolones. Peak
areas were measured relative to that of 3-
methyl-1H-pyrazolone.
Preparation of 1-i- -fucopyranosyl-4-(4-
L
Estimation of the yield of 1-lactosyl-4-tolyl-
azopyrazol-5-one.—An aliquot (2–100 mL) of
a stock solution of lactose containing between
1.6 and 400 nmol was placed into an autosam-
pler vial and evaporated to dryness. Hydra-
zine hydrate (25 mL) and water (25 mL) were
added, and after 4 h the sample was evapo-
rated to dryness. Toluene was added (50 mL),
and the samples were evaporated, dissolved
in water (25 mL), and re-evaporated before
being dissolved in 3:7 MeOH–0.2 M sodium
acetate pH 4.6 (100 mL). After the addition
of 1:4 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl acetoacetate–2,2,2
trifluoroethanol (20 mL), the vial was capped
and incubated at rt for 1 h. The sample was
evaporated to dryness (centrifugal evapora-
tor), redissolved in water (25 mL), and re-
evaporated before being dissolved in satd
NaHCO3 (0.5 mL), followed by the addition
of diazotised aminotoluene (2–20 mmol). Af-
ter 10 min, the reaction was quenched by
adding acetylacetone (20 mL), the sample was
left for 10 min, then it was quantitatively
transferred to appropriate volumetric flasks to
produce solutions containing between 0.3 and
20 nmol/mL of the lactose derivative. The
insoluble precipitates formed from reagent ex-
cess were observed to redissolve upon dilu-
tion. Replicate samples were prepared.
The solutions were analysed by HPLC us-
ing a Keystone C18 column, 5mm, 150×4.6
mm. The gradient was 16:85 MeCN–(1:19
MeCN–0.02 M ammonium acetate pH 5.9)
for 1 min, increasing linearly to 7:18 at 17
min, then increased 3:2 at 20 min and main-
tained for 3 min. Aliquots (25 mL) of each
sample were injected using an autosampler,
and the detection wavelength was 420 nm.
Estimation of the number of isomers formed
for selected monosaccharides and disaccha-
rides.—Approximately 1.4 mmol of sugar dis-
solved in water (100 mL) was placed into a
vial, 20 mL of hydrazine monohydrate was
methylbenzeneazo) - 3 - methylpyrazol - 5 - one
(12b).—Fucose hydrazone was prepared ac-
cording to the method of Williams [4]. Fucose
hydrazone (100 mg, 0.56 mmol) was dissolved
in 1:3 MeCN–water (5 mL) and 2,2,2-tri-
fluoroethyl acetoacetate (0.2 mL) was added.
After 3 h, the sample was lyophilised, the
residue was dissolved in 0.5 M NaHCO3 (10
mL), and diazotised 4-methyl aminobenzene
(1 mmol) was added in aliquots (4×0.5 mL)
within 2 min. After 5 min, 2,4-pentanedione
(0.2 mL) was added, and the mixture stirred
for a further 10 min. The mixture was aci-
dified with AcOH to pH 6 and washed with
CHCl3 (2×10 mL). It was purified by re-
versed-phase HPLC as described above for
1-lactosyl-4-(4-methylbenzeneazo)-3-methyl-
pyrazol-5-one, concd on a rotary evaporator,
and lyophilised to give a yellow gum (50 mg;
1
0.14 mmol; 25%). H NMR (CDCl3): 1.34 (d,
3 H, H-6), 2.26 (s, 1 H, methyl), 2.24 (s, 1 H,
methyl), 3.61 (dd, 1 H, H-3, J3,4 3.5 Hz), 3.67
(d, 1 H, H-4, J4,5 0 Hz), 3.82 (q, 1 H, H-5, J5,6
6.5 Hz), 4.17 (dd, 1 H, H-2, J2,3 9.2 Hz), 5.07
(d, 1 H, H-1, J1,2 9.2 Hz), 7.16 (d, 2 H, H-2%,
J2%3% 8.4 Hz), 7.26 (d, 2 H), 13.3 (br s, OꢀH).
13C NMR (CDCl3): 11.8, 16.5 and 21.0 (3
Me), 68.0, 72.0, 73.2 and 75.0 (Fuc C-2, C-3,
C-4 and C-5), 82.1 (Fuc C-1), 115.9 (Ph C-2/
6), 127.2 (Ph C-4), 130.2 (Ph C-3/5), 136.2 (Ph
C-1), 138.7 (Pyr C-4), 148.8 (Pyr C-3), 159.3
(Pyr C-5). Positive-ion ESIMS: [M+H]+=
m/z 363. Negative-ion ESIMS: [M+H]+=
m/z 363.
References
[1] W.C. Kett, M. Batley, J.W. Redmond, Carbohydr. Res.,
299 (1997) 129–141.
[2] S. Hase, Pre- and post-column detection oriented
derivatisation techniques in HPLC, in Z. El Rassi (Ed.),
Carbohydrate Analysis: High Performance Liquid Chro-