560
A. HAYASHI et al.
was treated with (NH4)2SO4. The precipitate obtained at 45–65%
saturation was dissolved in 2 mL of the buffer and placed on a column
(1:7 ꢂ 25 cm) of Superdex 200 equilibrated with the buffer, and 0.55-
mL fractions were collected. The active fractions (28–34) were pooled,
diluted 5-fold with H2O, and placed on a column (1:7 ꢂ 25 cm) of
hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) equilibrated with 10 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.0). After it was washed with 15 mL of
10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), the enzyme was eluted with a
linear gradient established with 60 mL of 10 mM potassium phosphate
(pH 7.0) and 60 mL of 500 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), and
3-mL fractions were collected. The active fractions (28–31) were
pooled and stored on ice but not frozen, since freezing and thawing
would spoil the enzyme significantly.
Fig. 1. Acetyl Transfer Catalyzed by MAPG ATase.
during growth in the presence of Clꢀ, while it produced
DAPG in the absence of Clꢀ.21) Production of DAPG
was strongly inhibited by Clꢀ or pyoluteorin in the
culture medium, whereas Brꢀ and Iꢀ were almost
ineffective. Consistently with this, significant activity of
MAPG ATase was observed in cell-free extract prepared
from bacterial cells grown without Clꢀ. The activity
decreased markedly when strain YGJ3 was grown in the
presence of Clꢀ or pyoluteorin. In the present study,
based on these findings, Pseudomonas sp. YGJ3 was
cultivated in the absence of Clꢀ to achieve a high degree
of expression of MAPG ATase, and MAPG ATase was
purified from an extract of bacterial cells to examine its
molecular and catalytic properties. We found for the first
time that MAPG ATase is composed of PhlA, PhlC, and
PhlB, and that it catalyzes the disproportionation of 2
moles of MAPG to phloroglucinol (PG) and DAPG
(Fig. 1). Furthermore, a phl gene cluster was cloned
from strain YGJ3, confirming that genes phlACB encode
MAPG ATase.
Enzyme assay. In 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), DAPG
showed an absorption peak at 370 nm, while MAPG and PG scarcely
showed any absorption at this wavelength. Hence the enzyme activity
was determined by measuring the increase (forward reaction) and the
decrease (reverse reaction) in A370 ("370 ¼ 6:0 mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1) with a
spectrophotometer UV-300 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). When the
activity was measured at
a different pH, the molar extinction
coefficient determined at that pH was used. The reaction was carried
out at 25 ꢁC in a cuvette (light path, 1 cm). The standard reaction
mixture (3 mL) contained 150 mmol of potassium phosphate (pH 7.0),
1.2 mmol of MAPG dissolved in 30 mL of ethanol, and the enzyme. The
activity of the reverse reaction was determined with a mixture (3 mL)
containing 150 mmol of potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.3 mmol of
DAPG dissolved in 30 mL of ethanol, 6 mmol of PG, and the enzyme.
Unless otherwise noted, the enzyme activity was determined in the
forward reaction. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the
amount catalyzing the formation or the disappearance of 1 mmol of
DAPG per min under the assay conditions. Specific activity was
expressed as units per mg of protein. Protein was measured by the
method of Lowry et al., with bovine serum albumin as standard.23)
Materials and Methods
Chemicals. MAPG and DAPG were purchased from Tokyo
Chemical Industry (Tokyo) and Toronto Chemical Research (Toronto,
Canada) respectively. Pyoluteorin was isolated from culture broth of
Pseudomonas sp. YGJ3 as described previously.21) All other chemicals
were of commercially available analytical grade.
Identification and quantification of reaction products. After the
enzyme reaction, the enzyme protein was removed by centrifugal
filtration with an Amicon Ultra 10K (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland).
The filtrate was applied to TLC with a silica gel 60 F254 (Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany), and CHCl3–MeOH (4:1, v/v) was used as
solvent. The spots of the products detected by UV were extracted with
H2O (for PG) and with ethanol (for MAPG and DAPG). The extracts
were applied again to silica gel TLC with authentic samples: the
Rf-values were 0.47, 0.67, and 0.82 for PG, MAPG, and DAPG
respectively.
Microorganisms. Pseudomonas sp. YGJ3 (Faculty of Engineering,
Gifu University) was aerobically cultivated at 30 ꢁC for 24 h in a
synthetic liquid medium in which Clꢀ was excluded and ethanol was
used as carbon and energy source, as described previously.21) Bacterial
cells were collected by centrifugation at 4 ꢁC, washed with 50 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), and stored at ꢀ25 ꢁC until needed.
E. coli XL1-Blue MRA as host for Charomid vector and XL1-Blue
MRF0 as host for the plasmid vector were from Stratagene (La Jolla,
CA).22) The former was grown at 37 ꢁC in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium
(polypeptone 20 g, yeast extract 10 g, and NaCl 20 g per 1 L of distilled
H2O, pH 7.0), and the latter in LB medium containing tetracyclin
(10 mg/mL).
For quantitative determination of MAPG and DAPG, the reaction
mixture (0.7 mL) at equilibrium was extracted 3 times with 0.7 mL of
CHCl3. The extract was evaporated at 25 ꢁC. The resulting residue was
dissolved in 200 mL of 50% methanol-H3PO4 (pH 3.0), and 10 mL of it
was analyzed by HPLC. To determine PG, the reaction mixture was
deproteinized by centrifugal filtration, and the filtrate (2.5 mL) was
analyzed by HPLC. HPLC was performed at 45 ꢁC with a LC-9A
HPLC system (Shimadzu) composed of a Shim-pack C18 reversed-
phase column (0:6 ꢂ 15 cm), a LC-9A pump, a SPD-6AV UV-Vis
monitor, and a C-R6A data processor. Elution was done with 50%-
MeOH–H3PO4 (pH 3.0) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. A310 (for MAPG
and DAPG) and A210 (for PG) were monitored. Under these conditions,
the elution times were 4.7, 7.8, and 47 min for PG, MAPG, and DAPG
respectively.
Purification of MAPG ATase. Unless otherwise specified, all
manipulations were done at 0–4 ꢁC with 50 mM potassium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0). Bacterial cells (20 g, wet weight) were suspended with
60 mL of the buffer and broken with a Sonifier (Branson, Danbury,
CT). After centrifugation at 30;000 ꢂ g for 15 min, the supernatant
solution (crude extract) was treated with (NH4)2SO4. The precipitate
obtained between 35 and 65% saturation was collected by centrifu-
gation and dissolved in about 18 mL of the buffer. Half of the solution
was put on a column (3 ꢂ 30 cm) of Superdex 200 (GE-Healthcare,
Buckinghamshire, UK) equilibrated with the buffer, and 3-mL
fractions were collected. At this step, most of the PhlG (DAPG
hydrolase) was separated from the MAPG ATase. The active fractions
(fractions 25–28) were pooled and placed on a column (1:2 ꢂ 12 cm)
of Q Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with the
buffer. After it was washed with 200 mL of the buffer, the enzyme was
eluted with a gradient established with 60 mL of the buffer and 60 mL
of the buffer containing 1 M NaCl, and 3-mL fractions were collected.
The active fractions (12–14) were pooled. The other half of the
solution was treated similarly and the pooled solutions were combined.
The solution was diluted with the buffer so as to make A280 0.85, and
Analytical methods. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)
was performed with 5–15% Ready Gels J (Bio-Rad) and Davis’s
electrophoresis buffer.24) SDS–PAGE was done with 12.5% polyacryl-
amide gel, as described by Laemmli.25) Protein bands were stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. Densitometric measurement of
protein on the polyacrylamide gel was done with a Flying Spot
Scanner (Shimadzu). Electroblotting of protein from polyacrylamide
gel to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane was performed with semi-
dry blotting apparatus HorizBLOT AE-6675 (Atto, Tokyo), and the N-
terminal amino acid sequence was determined by Edman degradation
with a Procise 492 protein sequencing system (PE Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA). The molecular mass of the enzyme was estimated by
gel filtration with Superdex 200 (1:8 ꢂ 22 cm) previously equilibrated