Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
1794
Qinsheng Zhang et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis 35 (2014) 1793–1799
of the mpg‐C3N4 support involved the use of aqueous ammo‐
nium bifluoride (NH4HF2) and/or hydrogen fluoride (HF)
which are hazardous and not environmentally friendly [10].
Rode et al. [11] used supercritical CO2 as a solvent, which re‐
quires high H2 and CO2 pressures > 7.0 MPa. Liu et al. [12]
achieved both excellent conversion and selectivity in the hy‐
drogenation of phenol using a dual‐supported Pd Lewis acid
catalyst. However, the catalyst contains Lewis acids such as
AlCl3, phosphotungstic acid, which imposes severe limitations
on their use in hydrogenation applications in general and adds
a chemical sensitivity that restricts substrates, purity, and reac‐
tion conditions. Therefore, the design and preparation of a
novel catalyst with high activity and selectivity is still a chal‐
lenge.
As is well known, nanoscale amorphous alloy catalysts with
long range disorder and short range order usually exhibit
higher activity and better selectivity in hydrogenation. Their
unique structure and high concentration of coordinatively un‐
saturated sites lead to catalytic activity and selectivity superior
to those of their crystalline counterparts [13,14]. For example,
Li et al. [15,16] synthesized a novel mesoporous Ce‐doped Pd
catalyst with a hollow chamber. This catalyst exhibited a higher
activity and selectivity to cyclohexanone in the liquid phase
hydrogenation of phenol. The hydrogenation of bio‐oil model
compounds was carried out using Ni‐B amorphous catalysts.
The results showed that the conversion of model compounds
(acetone, furfural and phenol) and the selectivity of saturated
alcohols reached 99.9% and 95% at 110 °C, 4 MPa H2 for 4 h
[17]. Poly(N‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidone) (PVP) is a water‐soluble
polymer, and is applied as a protective agent for preparing na‐
noscale catalysts [18]. In this paper, we present a new method
for the synthesis of cyclohexanol by the aqueous phase selec‐
tive hydrogenation of phenol using a PVP‐NiB amorphous cat‐
alyst for the first time.
and analyzed by a GC 112A equipped with a FID detector and
an SE‐54 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness),
column temperature 140 °C, detector 230 °C, sample injector
220 °C.
The IR spectra of PVP and the PVP‐NiB amorphous catalyst
were recorded using a Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrometer. The
results are shown in Fig. 1. It was found that the peak positions
from 3000 to 400 cm–1 and the intensity of the absorption peak
were changed. This may be due to the coordinative bond be‐
tween the oxygen atom and nitrogen atom of the PVP molecule
with the surficial Ni atom [19]. For example, there were ab‐
sorption intensity weakening and a blue‐shift of the C=O
stretch vibrational band (1662 cm–1) for PVP‐NiB compared
with pure PVP [20]. In addition, the peak was broadened and
there were blue shifts of the bending vibration at 1463 cm–1
(–CH2–) and stretch vibrational band at 1291 cm–1 (–C–C–).
These were due to the coordination of the lone pair electrons of
N and O with the empty orbitals of Ni [21]. The results showed
that PVP molecules existed on the surface of the catalyst, and
the N and O of PVP coordinated with the metal Ni atom.
Selected PVP‐NiB catalysts were synthesized with the molar
ratio of Ni to PVP monomer of 8:27. According to the ICP analy‐
sis, the compositions of the Ni and B were 47.9% and 11.4%
(weight percent), respectively and the ratio of Ni to B (mo‐
lar/molar) was 1:1.4. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the
PVP‐NiB catalysts. As can be seen, catalysts with different pro‐
portions of n(Ni):n(PVP) have similar XRD patterns. Only one
broad diffraction peak was observed at around 45°, which is
indicative of a typical Ni‐B amorphous structure [22]. When
PVP‐NiB (n(Ni):n(PVP) = 8:27) was applied in the hydrogena‐
tion of phenol at 30 °C, 0.2 MPa H2, and 18 h, one broad diffrac‐
tion peak was observed at around 45° in the obtained sampe,
the same as the fresh one. The results showed the high stability
of the catalyst, which can be reused.
The PVP‐NiB amorphous catalyst was prepared by the re‐
duction of nickel chloride with NaBH4 [18]. The water‐soluble
polymer served as both a protective reagent and support. Be‐
fore the reduction, PVP (0.3 g, 0.027 mol) and nickel chloride
(2.0 g, 0.008 mol) were dissolved in methanol (20 mL) at 80 °C
for 3 h. NaBH4 (1.0 g) was slowly added to the solution. The
resulting black precipitate was separated with a high speed
centrifuge, and thoroughly washed three times with distilled
water. The fresh wet catalyst was dried at 45 °C overnight in a
vacuum oven. In a similar way, other catalysts of the different
molar ratios of Ni to PVP monomer were synthesized, respec‐
tively. The PVP‐NiB amorphous catalysts were characterized by
their infrared spectra (IR), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmis‐
sion electron microscopy (TEM), X‐ray photoelectron spectra
(XPS) and inductively coupled plasma analysis (ICP).
Figure 3 shows the TEM micrographs and corresponding
particle size distribution of the PVP‐NiB samples. The images
revealed well dispersed particles with a mean size of 3 nm, a
narrow size distribution, and no aggregation. The correspond‐
ing mean particle diameters were measured and calculated by
counting 190 particles from the enlarged photographs.
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
A typical procedure for the hydrogenation of phenol was as
follows. PVP‐NiB (0.5 g), phenol (0.1 g) and water (6 mL) were
placed in a 20 mL reactor. The reactor system was purged with
N2 three times followed by H2 three times. The reaction was
started under 0.2 MPa H2. The reaction mixture was stirred
vigorously at the reaction temperature. The products were
separated from the water. First, the catalyst was removed from
the liquid by filtration. Then the organic phase was extracted
C=O
CH
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1600 1200 800 400
Wavenumber (cm1)
Fig. 1. IR spectra of PVP (1) and PVP‐NiB catalyst with different molar
ratios of Ni:PVP. (2) 2:27; (3) 4:27; (4) 8:27; (5) 16:27.