2
Z. Long et al. / Catalysis Communications 59 (2015) 1–4
2
2
. Experimental
Table 1
3 2 2 2 2
Aerobic oxidation of benzene to phenol catalyzed by [(C CNpy) Pd(OAc) ] HPMoV using
different solvents.
a
.1. Materials and methods
All solvents and reagents were purchased commercially and used
without further purification. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were per-
formed on a CHN elemental analyzer (Vario EL cube). Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS10 FT-IR instru-
−
1
ment (KBr disks) in the 4000–400 cm region. The amount of leached
palladium species in the filtrate after a reaction was measured using a
Jarrell-Ash 1100 ICP-AES spectrometer.
Entry
Solvent
Volume (mL)a
LiOAc (g)
Phenol yield (%)b
2
.2. Catalyst preparation
(C CNpy) Pd(OAc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Acetonitrile-H
2
O
2/4
2/4
2/4
2/4
2/4
0/6
3/3
4/2
2/4
2/4
2/4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
0
0
Ethanol-H
2
O
[
3
2
2 2
] HPMoV
2
has been prepared and characterized
DMF-H O
2
by CHN elemental analysis, TG, FT-IR, UV–vis, ESR, SEM and XRD in our
previous paper [15]. CHN elemental analysis for the presently synthe-
sized [(C
Acetone-H
2
O
2.3
5.6
0
3.1
1.4
2.5
4.3
4.0
Acetic acid-H
Acetic acid-H
Acetic acid-H
2
2
2
O
O
O
3 2 2 2 2
CNpy) Pd(OAc) ] HPMoV , found: C 19.11 wt.%, N 4.08 wt.%,
H 2.01 wt.%; calcd: C 19.07 wt.%, N 4.04 wt.%, H 2.06 wt.%.
Acetic acid-H O
2
Acetic acid-H
Acetic acid-H
Acetic acid-H
2
2
2
O
O
O
Without
0.1
0.3
1
1
0
1
2
.3. Catalytic test
a
Reaction conditions: benzene 2 mL (22.5 mmol), catalyst 0.05 g (0.08 mol% based on
2.0 MPa, 110 °C, 4 h.
Phenol yield (%) = mmol phenol / mmol initial benzene.
Hydroxylation of benzene was carried out in a customer-designed
benzene substrate), O
2
temperature controllable pressured titanium reactor (25 mL) equipped
with a mechanical stirrer. In a typical run, 0.05 g (0.08 mol%) [(C CNpy)
Pd(OAc) HPMoV , 0.2 g LiOAc, 2 mL (22.5 mmol) benzene, and
aqueous solution of acetic acid (2 mL acetic acid and 4 mL H O) were
added into the reactor successively. After the reactor was charged
with 2.0 MPa O at room temperature, the reaction was conducted at
10 °C for 4 h with vigorous stirring. After reaction, 1,4-dioxane was
b
3
2
2
]
2
2
2
which largely accounts for the much enhanced phenol yield (entry 5).
Besides, previous reports [8,10] have suggested that acetic acid partici-
2
1
pates in the formation of the reactive intermediates C
Pd(OAc) , which is crucial for the catalysis (also see this in detail
later). However, increasing the acetic acid concentration in the mixed
solvent acetic acid-H O from 2/4 (entry 5) to 3/3 (entry 7) and further
6 5
H PdOAc and
added into the product mixture as an internal standard. The mixture
was analyzed by gas chromatograph (GC) with a FID and a capillary
column (SE-54; SE-54; 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm). Because only the
phenol GC peak was detected as the product when the reaction was
performed around the above typical conditions, the GC-measured selec-
tivity for phenol is reasonably estimated to be above 99%. For recovering
the solid catalyst, it was filtrated from the reacted mixture, washed with
acetic acid and dichloromethane, and dried in vacuum oven at 80 °C for
C
6
H
5
3
2
to 4/2 (entry 8) gives phenol yields of 5.6%, 3.1% and 1.4%, respectively.
This substantial decrease in phenol yields may associate to excessive
oxidation caused by radical processes in the highly concentrated acetic
acid aqueous solutions [8].
It is noted that the solvent of aqueous acetic acid used above was
buffered with LiOAc. Without LiOAc (entry 9), the phenol yield dropped
to 2.5%, with the GC peak of biphenyl clearly detected (though in trace
amount) and darkened color of the reacted mixture observed. As the
over-oxidation byproducts, catechol, hydroquinone or benzoquinone
are well detectable with the present GC analysis, but they were unde-
tectable in this work. Consequently, the observed dark color implies
the occurrence of tar as the deep-oxidation byproduct. When the
amount of LiOAc increased to 0.1 g and 0.2 g, the phenol yield increased
to 4.3% and 5.6% (entries 10 and 5) with complete disappearance of
biphenyl, while the dark color of tar could not be visualized any more.
The disappearance of biphenyl and enhanced phenol production consist
with the previous proposal that the addition of the buffer agent LiOAc
favors the hydroxylation at the expense of coupling reaction [10]. In ad-
dition, LiOAc buffers the aqueous acetic acid, reduces the overpowering
oxygen radicals, and thus enhances the selective hydroxylation process
[8,10,17]. However, when excessive amount of LiOAc (0.3 g) was used,
the generation of reactive oxygen species may be depressed, and the
phenol yield decreased to 4.0% (entry 11).
For an aerobic oxidation process, the oxygen pressure should be
one of the most important parameters to influence the reaction result.
As shown in Fig. 1(A), at the relatively low O
only a small amount of phenol (1.2% yield) was obtained with explicit
detection of biphenyl (0.4% yield). When the O pressure increased to
2.0 MPa, the phenol yield was pronouncedly enhanced to 5.6% with
diminishing of biphenyl to zero. Stoichiometrically, two benzene mole-
cules react with a half O
while the reaction of two benzene molecules with one O
leads to the formation of two phenol molecules. The high O
8
h. The average values of three parallel reaction tests were given for
phenol yields.
3
. Results and discussion
This work is to reveal the reductant-free heterogeneous catalysis
for aerobic oxidation of benzene to phenol over the hybrid catalyst
(C CNpy) Pd(OAc) HPMoV . However, in our recent paper [15], the
[
3
2
]
2 2
2
same hybrid catalyst has been demonstrated to be highly efficient for
oxidative dehydrogenation of benzene with molecular oxygen to biphe-
nyl. Therefore, tuning of reaction conditions should be crucial in this
work. Owing to extreme importance of the nature of solvent used in a
liquid-phase reaction [16], we started with solvent selection in investi-
gating the effects of reaction parameters, with the results shown in
Table 1. It is seen that no phenol was yielded with solvents of aqueous
solutions of acetonitrile, ethanol or DMF (dimethylformamide) (entries
1
–3), and only low phenol yield of 2.3% was observed with aqueous
solution of acetone (entry 4). The highest phenol yield of 5.6% was
obtained in aqueous solution of acetic acid (entry 5), indicating that
aqueous acetic acid solution is the preferred solvent for this reaction.
Then the effect of volume ratio of acetic acid to water on the phenol
yield was investigated with the certain volume for the mixed solvent
of 6 mL. Entry 6 of Table 1 showed no phenol product with pure water
as the solvent. Benzene is immiscible with water; therefore, the solid
catalyst well dispersed in water is difficult to contact benzene substrate,
which hinders the play of its catalytic role in the reaction. Adding acetic
acid into water increases the organic character of the aqueous solvent
and thus benefits the solubilization of benzene in the reaction medium,
2
pressure of 1.0 MPa,
2
2
molecule to produce one biphenyl molecule;
molecule
pressure
2
2