Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
When two or more catalysts are applied together to
Table 2: Substrate scope.
a reaction system, the catalytic performance is sometimes
enhanced by a synergistic effect to give a better result. This
strategy has been explored for several combinations of
[10]
catalysts such as metal complexes and non-metal catalysts.
In contrast, this approach has been less well explored for
[
11]
metal NP catalysts, probably because these catalysts are
[
12]
1
2
[a]
[b]
often incompatible with other catalysts. To our knowledge,
there had been no example of synergistic effects between
chiral NP catalysts and other types of catalyst. Quite recently,
our group reported a synergistic effect between Au/Pd
bimetallic NP catalysts and metal Lewis acid catalysts for
Entry R , R
Ar
3
Yield [%]
ee [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CH , H (1a)
CH , H
CH , H
CH
CH , H
CH , H
CH , H
CH , H
CH , H (1b)
C H , H (1c) Ph
(4-Me)C
1d)
Ph
3aa 93
3ab 88
3ac 85
3ad 90
3ae 85
98
3
[
[
c]
(2-OMe)C H
(3-OMe)C H
(4-OMe)C
(3-Me)C H
(4-Me)C H
(4-Cl)C H
(4-F)C H
Ph
>99.5
98
3
6
4
4
4
d]
[e]
3
6
[e,f]
, H
H
98
99
98
99
98
98
99
99
3
6
[13]
hydrogen autotransfer processes. From these findings, we
envisioned that cooperative catalyst systems of chiral metal
NP catalysts and metal Lewis acids may give a new oppor-
tunity to develop highly active asymmetric catalysis.
3
6
4
3af
84
3
6
4
[
d]
3ag 77
3ah 81
3ba 61
3ca 88
3da 69
3
6
4
[d]
[g]
3
6
4
[h]
3
n
[e]
[e]
We then examined the use of metal Lewis acid cocatalysts
to activate the amide substrate. After screening several Lewis
10
11
5
11
[
[
[
d]
i]
H
4
, H Ph
6
(
acids, it was found that Sc(OTf) gave the best result (Table 1,
3
i
[e]
12
13
14
15
C H , H (1e)
Ph
Ph
(4-F)C H
3ea 72
3 fa
3 fh 72
3ga 35
99
99
99
99
3
7
entries 4–6); when 1 mol% Sc(OTf) was employed, the yield
3
[
e]
-(CH ) - (1 f)
-(CH ) -
-(CH ) - (1g)
56
2
2
improved dramatically (entry 4). It is remarkable that chiral
d]
2
2
6
4
NPs were compatible with Sc(OTf) and a synergistic effect
[d,j]
[e]
3
Ph
2
1
was found to enhance the catalytic performance significantly.
This is in marked contrast to the fact that acidic additives
sometimes inhibit these types of reactions using Rh-BINAP
[
1
a] Isolated yield. [b] Determined by HPLC analysis. [c] PI/CB Rh/Ag (Rh:
mol%) and 4 (0.4 mol%) were used. [d] PI/CB Rh/Ag (Rh: 0.5 mol%)
1
and 4 (0.2 mol%) were used. [e] Calculated by H NMR analysis after
isolation of the mixture of the product and the starting material.
[f] 1.07m. [g] Toluene/H O=3:1 and 0.36 m. [h] Crotonamide (1b) was
used. [i] 1.6 m. [j] Toluene/H O=2:1 and 0.4m. The concentrations were
2
[5b]
complex systems and that most Rh-catalyzed asymmetric
,4-addition reactions tend to be performed under either basic
conditions. This result may be ascribed to the unique
1
2
[14]
calculated based on the amount of toluene.
character of Sc(OTf)3. We expected that Sc(OTf) lowered
3
the LUMO level of the amide substrate to accelerate the CÀC
bond-forming step. At the same time, a second role of
Sc(OTf) , such as acceleration of a protonation (product
substrate 1e, and cyclic substrate with a six-membered ring
1 f, were converted into the corresponding 1,4-addition
products in good yields with outstanding enantioselectivities
(entries 10–13). The application of the reaction conditions to
the formal synthesis of a pharmacologically important com-
3
release and catalyst regeneration) step by inner-sphere water
ligands of the water-compatible Lewis acid, was also
[14]
assumed.
increased and the reaction time was extended, the desired
,4-addition product was obtained in 93% yield with 98% ee
entry 7). Notably, no metal leaching was identified by ICP
When the loading of the chiral diene was
[
15]
1
(
pound, Paroxetine, was demonstrated by the reaction of 1 f
with 4-fluorophenylboronic acid (Scheme 1). The product
analysis under any of the conditions.
Substrate generality was surveyed under the optimized
conditions (Table 2). Arylboronic acids with either electron-
donating or electron-withdrawing groups were tested for the
reaction with 1a (Table 2, entries 1–8). The presence of
a substituent at the ortho-position decreased the reactivity
significantly, but an increase in the catalyst loading gave the
product in high yield with outstanding enantioselectivity
Scheme 1. Formal synthesis of pharmacologically important com-
pound.
(
entry 2). The reactions with arylboronic acids bearing an
electron-donating substituent at the meta- or para-position
proceeded smoothly to afford the products in high yields with
excellent enantioselectivities (entries 4–6). The reactions with
arylboronic acids bearing an electron-withdrawing substitu-
ent also afforded the products in high yields with excellent
enantioselectivities, when the catalyst loading was slightly
increased (entries 3, 7, and 8). Notably, the primary amide
could be applied directly, and the desired product was
obtained in 61% yield with 98% ee when a toluene major
cosolvent system was used (entry 9). Several N-benzyl
unsaturated amides, including aliphatic substrate 1c, aromatic
substrate 1d, sterically bulky isopropyl group-substituted
3 fh, which can be converted into Paroxetine by using
[
15]
a reported method, was obtained in 72% yield with 99%
ee (entry 14). On the other hand, conducting the reaction with
1g, a cyclic substrate with a five-membered ring, gave the
desired product in 35% yield with 99% ee (entry 15). In this
reaction, formation of ortho-disubstituted benzene side
product 5 was observed, which was presumably generated
[16]
through sequential 1,4-addition to 1g, 1,4-migration of Rh,
and further 1,4-addition to another molecule of 1g. In this
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!