Table 1 Concentrations of ligands 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a and 3b in mM at half maximal DTm (with DTm at 1 mM ligand in K shown in parentheses)17
1a
2a
3a
1b
2b
3b
K-ras
c-kit1
h-Telo
c-kit2
c-myc
ds-DNA
1.49 (16.7)
0.62 (34.0)
0.53 (27.3)
0.38 (16.2)
0.17 (17.7)
410.0 (0.0)
4.00 (4.0)
3.74 (6.6)
5.59 (2.8)
3.41 (4.2)
2.25 (6.2)
410.0 (0.0)
3.68 (2.7)
2.00 (16.0)
1.07 (19.8)
1.00 (16.7)
1.16 (9.3)
1.00 (7.5)
410.0 (0.0)
3.56 (9.4)
0.88 (20.1)
0.87 (20.0)
1.86 (6.1)
1.03 (7.1)
410.0 (0.5)
1.47 (20.8)
410.0 (0.7)
0.48 (25.9)
0.46 (14.9)
0.25 (13.8)
410.0 (0.4)
410.0 (0.0)
1.89 (3.9)
4.75 (1.0)
0.16 (14.1)
410.0 (0.0)
concentrations to reach this saturation were in the low micro-
molar range: 0.8 mM for c-myc, 2.0 mM for c-kit 1, 2.5 mM for
c-kit2, 2.8 mM for h-Telo and 5 mM for K-ras.
Ligand 2a, with its twisted conformation, did not show a
strong stabilisation potential for any of the quadruplexes
investigated at low ligand concentrations, but showed very
good stabilisation potential at higher ligand concentrations as
seen in Fig. 6.
serves as a new approach to achieve differential recognition
between G-quadruplexes.
We thank Cancer Research UK for programme funding and
for a studentship (S. M.), and Pembroke College for a Stokes
Junior Research Fellowship (G. D. P.). We are
thankful to Prof. J. K. M. Sanders for helpful discussions.
Notes and references
Much higher ligand concentrations were required to reach
saturation of the curves compared to 1a, making this ligand
less potent.16
1 (a) S. Rankin, A. P. Reszka, J. Huppert, M. Zloh, G. N. Parkinson,
A. K. Todd, S. Ladame, S. Balasubramanian and S. Neidle, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10584; (b) H. Fernando, A. P. Reszka,
J. Huppert, S. Ladame, S. Rankin, A. R. Venkitaraman, S. Neidle
and S. Balasubramanian, Biochemistry, 2006, 45, 7854.
In contrast, 3a with its W-shaped structure, showed selective
stabilisation for a particular G-quadruplex. It stabilised the
c-myc quadruplex with a DTm of 14.1 K at a concentration of
0.3 mM as depicted in Fig. 7. Ligand 3a stabilised the other
sequences with a very low DTm at low ligand concentrations
(i.e. o1 mM). Similar ligand concentrations for 3a compared
to 2a were required to reach the maximum measurable
stabilisation for K-ras and c-kit2. However, ligand 3a was
more potent for h-Telo than 2a as it reached the maximal DTm
at ligand concentrations of 3 mM compared to 8 mM. It is
noteworthy that 3a does not stabilise the c-kit1 quadruplex at
any of the ligand concentrations used. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first example of a small molecule that
exhibits significant stabilisation potential for one or more
quadruplexes, while showing no detectable stabilisation for
another. These results show that it is possible to achieve
excellent quadruplex discrimination by controlling the folding
of a particular molecular scaffold.
2 A. Siddiqui-Jain, C. L. Grand, D. J. Bearss and L. H. Hurley, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 11593.
3 S. Cogoi and L. E. Xodo, Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, 34, 2536.
4 A. M. Zahler, J. R. Williamson, T. R. Cech and D. M. Prescott,
Nature, 1991, 350, 718.
5 (a) D. Gomez, M.-F. O’Donohue, T. Wenner, C. Douarre,
J. Macadre, P. Koebel, M.-J. Giraud-Panis, H. Kaplan,
´
A. Kolkes, K. Shin-ya and J.-F. Riou, Cancer Res., 2006, 66,
6908; (b) M. Bejugam, S. Sewitz, P. S. Shirude, R. Rodriguez,
R. Shahid and S. Balasubramanian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
12926; (c) T.-M. Ou, Y.-J. Lu, C. Zhang, Z.-S. Huang,
X.-D. Wang, J.-H. Tan, Y. Chen, D.-L. Ma, K.-Y. Wong,
J. C.-O. Tang, A. S.-C. Chan and L.-Q. Gu, J. Med. Chem.,
2007, 50, 1465; (d) R. Rodriguez, S. Muller, J. A. Yeoman,
¨
C. Trentesaux, J.-F. Riou and S. Balasubramanian, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, DOI: 10.1021/ja805615w.
6 A. Bugaut, K. Jantos, J.-L. Wietor, R. Rodriguez, J. K.
M. Sanders and S. Balasubramanian, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 2677.
7 G. Zagotto, C. Sissi, S. Moro, D. Dal Ben, G. N. Parkinson,
K. R. Fox, S. Neidle and M. Palumbo, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2008,
16, 354.
Changing the primary amine of the side chain to pyrrolidine
did alter the quadruplex stabilisation potential. It decreased
the potency of ligands of type 1 but improved the molecular
recognition properties for molecules of type 2 and 3. The c-kit1
quadruplex was not stabilised by 3b, a feature displayed by the
ligands of the family possessing a W-shaped structure.
However, this molecule showed better molecular recognition
of the K-ras (DTm of 20.8 K), h-Telo (DTm of 25.9 K) and
c-kit2 (DTm of 14.9 K) quadruplexes and still showed good
stabilisation of c-myc with a DTm of 13.8 K. These results
show that it is possible to combine a controlled-folding
approach with side-chain variation to fine-tune the molecular
recognition properties of a particular scaffold.
8 K. Jantos, R. Rodriguez, S. Ladame, P. S. Shirude and
S. Balasubramanian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 13662.
9 D. Monchaud and M.-P. Teulade-Fichou, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2008, 6, 627.
10 P. S. Shirude, E. R. Gillies, S. Ladame, F. Godde, K. Shin-Ya, I. Huc
and S. Balasubramanian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11890.
11 (a) V. Berl, I. Huc, R. G. Khoury and J.-M. Lehn, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2001, 7, 2810; (b) H. Jiang, J.-M. Leger and I. Huc, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 3448; (c) L. Xing, U. Ziener, T. C. Sutherland and
L. A. Cuccia, Chem. Commun., 2005, 5751.
12 S. Yagi, I. Yonekura, M. Awakura, M. Ezoe and T. Tagagishi,
Chem. Commun., 2001, 557.
13 J.-L. Mergny and J.-C. Maurizot, ChemBioChem, 2001, 2, 124.
14 The Tm of the quadruplexes in 60 mM K+ in the absence of ligand
are: 45.9 1C (K-ras), 54.5 1C (c-kit 1), 72.7 1C (c-kit 2), 79.3 1C
(c-myc), 59.4 1C (h-Telo), 62.7 1C ds-DNA; the life cycler can
measure temperatures up to 94.0 1C.
15 As a recent example of a small molecule that interacts with
G-quadruplex loops, see: G. N. Parkinson, R. Ghosh and
S. Neidle, Biochemistry, 2007, 46, 2390–2397.
In conclusion, we have described a novel small molecule
family that significantly stabilises an array of quadruplexes.
Some of the small molecules compare favourably to the most
potent ligands reported in the literature. We demonstrated
how controlling the ligand conformation has a dramatic effect
on the molecular recognition properties of a molecule, and
16 For the h-Telo, c-kit1 and c-kit2 quadruplexes the thermal shifts
exhibited a biphasic profile which may be indicative of a different
mode of binding at higher ligand concentrations.
17 The values are an average of three independent measurements.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
82 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 80–82