R. Sarkari et al. / Catalysis Communications 12 (2011) 1067–1070
1069
Table 1
Cyclisation activity of ethylenediamine and aqueous glycerol at a reaction temperature of 350 °C over Zn–Cr catalysts prepared at pH=7 to 11 and calcined in air at 450 °C/5 h.
Catalyst wt.=0.2 g, feed rate=2 mL h− ; glycerol:EDA:H
1
O:N
=1:1:20.5:20.4 (mole ratio); and GHSV=18909 cc g
−1 −1
h
.
2
2
apH
BET–SA (m2 g−1
bCarbon
(wt.%)
cNH
dSpecific rate×108
)
%Conv.
EDA
%Conv.
3
uptake
%Selectivity
MP
eCalcined
fReduced
μmol g−1
gOthers
mol m2 s−1
Glycerol
Pyrazine
7
8
9
1
1
.0
.0
.0
0.0
1.0
31.7
38.1
45.3
56.4
63.4
35.2
40.8
37.6
56.2
60.0
57.5
69.4
74.0
56.2
44.5
43.7
55.6
71.3
59.4
28.3
2.83
2.68
1.91
2.76
2.75
360
284
101
302
466
65.2
64.0
69.2
66.2
55.7
18.8
18.5
16.5
18.3
21.5
15.9
17.4
14.2
15.4
22.8
6.8
7.4
10.4
5.7
2.6
a
b
c
d
e
f
pH maintained during the preparation Zn–Cr LDH catalysts.
Carbon contents of the used catalysts measured by CHN analysis.
NH
Specific rate is measured with respect to glycerol conversion and surface area of the reduced catalyst.
BET–surface areas of the fresh calcined ZnO–ZnCr catalysts.
BET–surface areas of the calcined and reduced (in 5%H balance Ar at 400 °C/5 h) ZnO–ZnCr
Other compounds such as pyrazinealdehyde, 2,3-dimethyl pyrazine, and 2,5-dimethyl pyrazine.
3 3
uptakes measured by TPD of NH of the fresh calcined and reduced catalysts.
2 4
O
2
2 4
O catalysts.
g
presence of HT phase layered double hydroxide (LDH) which is
the acidities of the catalysts (Table 1) measured by temperature
programmed desorption (TPD) of NH . The TPD of NH studies indicated
decomposed to form ZnO and ZnCr
O
2 4
phases [13] upon calcination
3
3
(
Fig. 1) in air at 450 °C for 5 h. The lattice parameters corresponding to
that the sample prepared at pH~9 is found to have lower acidity
compared to other catalysts. It appears that strong acid sites are
undesirable for the EDA and glycerol cyclisation reaction. The carbon
content on the used catalysts (Table 1) showed ca. 1.91% over pH=9
sample, which is lower compared to other samples.
the HT structure are found to be a=3.10 and c=22.5 for Zn–Cr LDH.
The basal spacing is calculated from the average of (00l) peaks
(
position of the (110) peaks (a~0.3106 nm). This is in good agreement
with the literature value [14,15]. The XRD patterns of the calcined
catalyst indicated the presence of reflections at 2θ=36.2, 31.7, 34.4,
d~0.775 nm), while the "a" dimension is calculated as twice the
To gain an insight into the methylpyrazine yields, we performed
experiments to check the influence of reaction temperature on the
5
0
6.6, and 62.8° and their corresponding ‘d’ values of 0.247, 0.281,
.260, 0.162, and 0.147 nm are attributed to ZnO [ICDD # 89–0510]
2 4
activity over ZnO–ZnCr O catalyst prepared at pH~9 and the data is
represented in Fig. 2. It is interesting to note that there is not much
change in selectivity towards MP with increase in reaction temper-
ature. The extent of conversion of EDA is slightly higher than that of
glycerol at all temperatures. The cyclisation activity of the ZnO–
phase and diffraction lines at 2θ=35.7, 30.3, 63.1, 57.4, and 43.4° with
the ‘d’ values of 0.251, 0.294, 0.147, 0.160, and 0.208 nm are ascribed
to the ZnCr O [ICDD # 22–1107] phase. The BET–surface areas of the
2 4
calcined and reduced Zn–Cr catalysts are reported in Table 1. It is
observed that there is not much variation in the BET–surface areas of
the calcined and reduced samples.
2 4
ZnCr O catalyst showed (Fig. 2) almost 99.4% conversion of EDA and
94% glycerol with ~72% selectivity towards methylpyrazine at 400 °C.
A number of experiments on the cyclisation activity over Zn–Cr
catalysts are carried out under standard conditions using 20 wt.%
aqueous glycerol and EDA. Based on the experimental data a plausible
reaction mechanism (Scheme 1) is proposed in conjunction with
earlier postulates for the formation of methylpyrazine [16].
First, we examined the EDA and aqueous glycerol cyclisation
activity over several ZnO–ZnCr
ranging from 7 to 11) at a reaction temperature of 350 °C and the
results are reported in Table 1. The ZnO–ZnCr samples prepared at
2 4
O catalysts (prepared at various pH
2 4
O
pH~9 shows relatively high EDA and glycerol conversion as well as
selectivity towards methylpyrazine compared to other catalysts.
Formation of about 18–20% of pyrazine along with by-products such
as 2,3-dimethylpyrazine, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, and pyrazinealdehyde,
A well-known mechanism on methylpyrazine formation is via
dehydrocyclisation of EDA and 1,2-propylene glycol (Scheme 2) over
mixed oxide catalysts is reported [10,11,17]. We anticipated that if
EDA and glycerol undergo similar transformation, the end product
could be pyrazylmethanol (Scheme 1, 2nd step or Scheme 3). On the
contrary a large amount of methylpyrazine is obtained in this study
along with some by-products. This is explained based on the
conversion of pyrazylmethanol into methylpyrazine (see reaction
mechanism Scheme 1) and pyrazinaldehyde [16].
(
~14–18%) were observed over all catalysts and slightly higher ~22% on
the catalyst prepared at pH=11. The better activity and selectivity of
the ZnO–ZnCr (sample prepared at pH~9) are explained based on
2 4
O
Several reaction parameters are evaluated during the cyclisation
of EDA and aqueous glycerol. We envisioned that the methylpyrazine
could be formed by condensation followed by cyclisation of glycerol
and EDA that proceeds through dehydrogenation, which undergoes
homo-coupling (Scheme 1, 3rd step) reaction subsequently forming
methylpyrazine and pyrazinealdehyde [18]. The high ratio of
methylpyrazine compared to pyrazinealdehyde is probably due to the
hydrogenation of pyrazinealdehyde [19] to form pyrazylmethanol
(Scheme 1, 5th step) during the course of reaction, as one would expect
equal proportions of pyrazinealdehyde and methylpyrazine for
reaction Scheme 1. Pyrazine the main by-product obtained by
Fig. 2. Influence of reaction temperature over calcined Zn–Cr catalyst prepared at
−
1
pH=9, calcined in air at 450 °C/5 h. Catalyst wt.=0.2 g, feed rate=2 mL h ; glycerol:
=1:1:20.5:20.4 (mole ratio); and GHSV=18909 cc g−
1
h
−1
. Methylpyr-
Scheme 2. Dehydrocyclization of EDA and 1,2-propylene glycol for the formation of
EDA:H
2
O:N
2
azine yields were calculated with respect to glycerol conversions.
methylpyrazine.