T. Kitamura et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 6118–6120
6119
Table 2
roiodobenzene and p-diiodobenzene also acted as good catalysts to
give 2a in 70% and 74% yields, respectively (Table 2, entries 9 and
a
Iodoarene-catalyzed fluorination of 1a
1
0).
2
0 mol% ArI
O
O
O
O
55% aq. HF
Ph
OEt
Ph
OEt
m-CPBA, DCE
F
2a
o
Table 3
4
0 C, 24 h
a
1a
Iodoarene-catalyzed fluorination of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds 1
Entry
Iodoarene
Yieldb (%)
20 mol% ArI
O
O
O
O
55% aq. HF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
PhI
79
83
85
80
15
83
88
85
70
74
35
R1
R2
p-Iodotoluene
o-Iodotoluene
Iodomesitylene
p-Iodoanisole
m-Iodoanisole
o-Iodoanisole
o-Ethyliodobenzene
p-Chloroiodobenzene
p-Diiodobenzene
p-Iodonitrobenzene
R1
R2
m-CPBA, DCE
F
2
o
40 C
1
Entry ArI
Time
(h)
Product
Yieldb
(%)
O
F
O
0
1
I
OEt
a
1
24
24
82
75
Conditions: 1a (1 mmol), 55% aqueous HF (10 mmol), m-CPBA (1.5 mmol), ArI
0.2 mmol), DCE (4 mL), 40 °C, 24 h.
Isolated yields by column chromatography on silica gel.
F
(
O N
2
b
2
b
F
F
O
O
2c
F
efficiently with iodobenzene catalysis. Here, we wish to report the
first example of catalytic fluorination of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds
using iodoarene catalysts.
To explore the catalytic fluorination using iodoarenes as catalyst,
we first optimized the reaction conditions in the fluorination reac-
tion of ethyl benzoylacetate (1a) as the model substrate. Since we
succeeded previously in the stoichiometric fluorination of 1,3-
dicarbonyl compounds by aqueous HF with the aid of PhIO, the
reaction conditions similar to the stoichiometric ones were
adopted. When the reaction of 1a (1 mmol) with 55% aqueous HF
OEt
2
PhI
F
2
c
3
4
I
24
1
2c
78
74
4
PhI
O
O
2d
(
10 equiv HF) was conducted in the presence of PhI (20 mol %) as
catalyst and m-CPBA (1.5 equiv) as oxidant in dichloromethane
DCM). The reaction at 40 °C for 24 h in DCM (2 mL) gave ethyl
-fluorobenzoylacetate (2a) in 51% yield (Table 1, entry 1).
OEt
PhI
F
(
2
2
d
Decreasing or increasing the amount of HF from 10 equiv HF re-
sulted in a similar yield of 2a (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Using
5
6
1
1
2d
79
79
I
I
4
mL of DCM slightly increased the yield to 57% (Table 1, entry 4).
O
O
O
2e
The reaction in dichloroethane (DCE) improved the yield to give
the best result (72% yield) (Table 1, entry 5) but increasing the
amount of DCE to 5 mL decreased the yield to 58% (Table 1, entry
OEt
F
6
). By examining the amount of m-CPBA (0.5–2.0 equiv), the best
amount of m-CPBA was found to be 1.5 equiv (Table 1, entries 5,
–9). Then, we examined other HF sources such as TEAꢀ3HF,
O
2f
7
I
Ph
Ph
7
24
44
TEAꢀ5HF and HFꢀpyridine complexes (Table 1, entries 10–13). The
fluorination using TEAꢀ5HF (20 equiv) and HFꢀpyridine (10 equiv)
gave 2a in 69% and 78% yields, respectively. Although HFꢀamine
complexes are also good HF sources, these complexes are much
more expensive than aqueous HF. We decided that the method
using HFꢀamine complexes was not suitable for large-scale synthe-
sis. Therefore, we continued to examine the catalytic fluorination
with aqueous HF.
F
2f
OMe
8
9
24
2f
50
70
I
OMe
24 (rt)c
2f
I
Using the above optimized conditions, several iodoarenes were
screened to check the catalytic efficiency. The results obtained
from the fluorination of 1a are given in Table 2. Compared with
PhI (Table 2, entry 1), p-iodotoluene, o-iodotoluene, iodomesityl-
ene, m-iodoanisole, o-iodoanisole and o-ethyliodobenzene served
as good catalysts (Table 2, entries 2–4, 6–8). These catalysts gave
O
O
2g
I
Ph
1
0
1
24
24
46
62
F
2
g
OMe
I
2
a in 80–88% yields. However, the presence of strong electron-
withdrawing (NO ) and electron-donating (MeO) substituents at
the para position decreased the catalytic efficiency to afford 2a in
5 and 35% yields, respectively (Table 2, entries 5 and 11). p-Chlo-
1
2g
2
(
continued on next page)
1