Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol Over Pt/Al-SBA-15 Catalysts
Yu et al.
agreement of that of Prochazkova et al.22 in terms of the
effect of the pore size.
Table II. Products of HDO of guaiacol over Al-SBA-15(20) catalyst at
two stirring rates.
Because cyclohexane has a high octane number, the bio-
oil upgraded over Pt/Al-SBA-15 is believed to have a high
potential as a transportation fuel. High potential of bio-oil
containing cyclohexane as a transportation fuel was pre-
sented in a study by Ahmad et al.23
200 rpm
400 rpm
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentane
Methyl cyclopentane
Benzene
Methyl cyclohexane
Methoxy benzene (anisole)
Pentyl cyclopentane
2-methoxy-4-methyl-phenol
1,2-dimethoxy benzene
Cyclohexane (cyclopentylmethyl)
1,1ꢁ-bicyclohexyl
16ꢂ07
0ꢂ36
0ꢂ42
42ꢂ63
0ꢂ27
1ꢂ13
3ꢂ93
0ꢂ27
–
–
–
–
0ꢂ45
3ꢂ83
1ꢂ35
9ꢂ77
2ꢂ43
6ꢂ65
0ꢂ83
16ꢂ07
4. CONCLUSION
Pt/Al-SBA-15(20), Pt/Al-SBA-15(40), Pt/Al-SBA-15(80),
and Pt/HZSM-5(11.5) were applied to the HDO of guaia-
col. Pt/Al-SBA-15(20) exhibited the highest guaiacol con-
version and cyclohexane yield, whereas Pt/HZSM-5(11.5)
exerted the lowest catalytic activity. The poor catalytic
activity of Pt/HZSM-5(11.5) was attributed to its small
pore size that hinders diffusion of guaiacol molecules
into the pores containing active sites. The catalytic activ-
ity of Pt/Al-SBA-15 increased with decreasing Si/Al ratio
because the quantity of acid sites increases with decreasing
Si/Al ratio. The results of this study indicate that the pore
size and the quantity of acid sites play important roles in
the conversion of guaiacol to cyclohexane.
4ꢂ11
11ꢂ21
–
Cyclohexyl benzene
Cyclopentane and methyl cyclopentane are produced
by isomerization, while cyclohexyl benzene and 1,1ꢁ-
bicyclohexyl are formed by aromatic ring condensation.
Under a low stirring rate (200 rpm), more reaction inter-
mediates were observed because of insufficient progress
of the reaction. Gates et al.1 suggested a mechanism for
deoxygenation of guaiacol over Pt/Al2O3 in which sev-
eral possible reactions were incorporated. According to
their suggestion, cyclohexane can be produced via phe-
nol or anisole. Phenols were not detected in this study,
Acknowledgment: This research was supported by
Basic Science Research Program through the National
Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Min-
istry of Education (2012R1A1B3003394).
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: Stockholm University Library
while anisole and 1,2-dimethoxy benzene were observed,
implying that cyclohexane could be produced via anisole.
IP: 75.146.62.155 On: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:41:19
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
However, Gates et al.1 argued that the reaction kinetic of
phenol formation is 40 times faster than that of anisole
formation. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility of
formation of phenol and subsequent conversion to other
species. Further investigation is needed to better constrain
the mechanism of cyclohexane formation.
References and Notes
1. T. Nimmanwudipong, R. C. Runnebaum, D. E. Block, and B. C.
Gates, Energy Fuels 25, 3417 (2011).
2. J. C. Hicks, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2280 (2011).
3. C. A. Mullen and A. A. Boateng, Energy Fuels 22, 2104
(2008).
In order to examine the effect of the pore size of the
catalyst, Pt/HZSM-5(11.5) was used additionally. Because
HZSM-5 has a larger quantity of acid sites with stronger
acidity than Al-SBA-15 (data not shown), a higher conver-
sion of guaiacol may be expected. As shown in Figure 4,
however, the employment of Pt/HZSM-5 resulted in a very
low guaiacol conversion.
Al-SBA-15 has large pores with the average pore diam-
eter of 6 nm so that the diffusion limitation against the
approach of guaiacol molecules to active sites of the cat-
alyst is low. To the contrary, the pore size of HZSM-5
is much smaller (ca. 0.56 nm), hindering the access of
guaiacol molecules to the active sites existing in the
catalyst pores. This is believed to have contributed to
the low guaiacol conversion over HZSM-5. Prochazkova
et al.22 studied the HDO reaction of benzaldehyde over
Pd-impregnated Beta and ZSM-5. ZSM-5 showed, due to
its smaller pore size, lower selectivity to and yield of the
target product. Based on this result, they suggested that
catalytic supports with large pore size are adequate for
HDO reaction. The result of the present study is in good
4. C. H. Ko, S. H. Park, J. K. Jeon, D. J. Suh, K. E. Jeong, and Y. K.
Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 1657 (2012).
5. Y. Yang, A. Gilbert, and C. C. Xu, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 360, 242
(2009).
6. M. Breysse, J. L. Portefaix, and M. Vrinat, Catal. Today 10, 489
(1991).
7. P. T. Vasudevan and J. L. G. Fierro, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 38, 161
(1996).
8. L. R. Radovic and F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, Chem. Phys. Carbon 25,
243 (1997).
9. X. Zhu, L. L. Lobban, R. G. Mallinson, and D. E. Resasco, J. Catal.
281, 21 (2011).
10. A. Gutierrez, R. K. Kaila, M. L. Honkela, R. Slioor, and A. O. I.
Krause, Catal. Today 147, 239 (2009).
11. S. Sitthisa and D. E. Resasco, Catal. Lett. 141, 784 (2011).
12. G. V. Smith and F. Notheisz, Heterogeneous Catalysis in Organic
Chemistry, Academic Press, San Diego (1999).
13. I. T. Ghampsona, C. Sepulveda, R. Garcia, J. L. G. Fierro,
N. Escalona, and W. J. DeSisto, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 435–436, 51
(2012).
14. W. Chang, G. Chae, S. R. Jang, J. Shin, and B. J. Ahn, J. Ind. Eng.
Chem. 18, 581 (2012).
15. H. W. Lee, H. J. Cho, J. H. Yim, J. M. Kim, J. K. Jeon, J. M. Sohn,
K. S. Yoo, S. S. Kim, and Y. K. Park, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17, 504
(2011).
530
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 15, 527–531, 2015