Fig. 5 (a) Photoresponse characteristics (white light, 100 mW cmÀ2
,
at bias voltage 10 V) of the single PPV-CdSe composite fiber, which
can be switched on/off quickly by photoirradiation. Inset: FE-SEM
image of a part of the measured device. The fiber bridges one 3 mm
gold electrodes gap. (b) Photocurrent spectral response of PPV and
PPV-CdSe bulk-heterojunction fiber device.
Fig. 4 TEM image of the PPV-CdSe fiber.
to absorption directly into the CdSe nanocrystals, producing
free charge carriers above the band gap.
electrospinning process resulted in the uniform distribution of
the CdSe nanocrystals in the fibers.14 For the high concentration
of CdSe nanocrystals in the composite fiber, phase separation
between the nanocrystals is about 10 nm, which is within the
length limitation of exciton diffusion in conjugated polymer.15
Fig. 5a presents the photoresponse behaviors of the single
PPV-CdSe composite fiber under light irradiation. With light
on or off, the device based on the PPV-CdSe fiber could work
between low and high impedance states fast and reversibly
with a switching ratio close to 5 orders of magnitude. The
significant photoresponse of PPV-CdSe composite fiber may
be attributed to the following reasons. First, the rough
surfaces of the electrospun PPV-CdSe fibers lead to a high
surface area-to-volume ratio, and subsequently result in many
photogenerated excitons in the fiber. Second, the homo-
geneous dispersion of nanocrystals in PPV polymer (Fig. 4)
creates a large donor–acceptor interface area which could
improve charge separation efficiency. Charge transfer will take
place efficiently due to the intimate contact of the two com-
ponents in the fiber. Additionally, the nanoscale phase separation
in the PPV-CdSe composite fiber may improve the electron
transport through the nanocrystals. As a result, a high photo-
current was obtained in the bulk-heterojunction fiber device
under a given external bias. Fig. 5b shows the photocurrent
spectral response of the pristine PPV and the PPV-CdSe bulk-
heterojunction fiber device, respectively. The PPV fiber device
has only one response peak at 460 nm. The spectral response
of the composite fiber device shows two peaks at 460 and
500 nm. To clarify the origin of the wavelength-dependent
photocurrent, we measured the absorption spectra of the CdSe
nanocrystals, PPV, and PPV-CdSe fibers (Fig. S2, ESIw). The
optical absorption spectrum of pure PPV fibers has an absorption
peak at 460 nm. For CdSe nanocrystals the absorption starts
a slow rise at around 500 nm. The absorption spectrum of
PPV-CdSe composite fibers is the superposition of the two
types of materials. According to the spectral response of the
devices (Fig. 5b), it is obvious that both absorption in the
polymer and absorption in the nanocrystal contributed to
photocurrent of the PPV-CdSe fiber. Additionally, the inten-
sity of photocurrent response originated from CdSe nano-
crystals is much higher than that from PPV, which must be due
In summary, we designed and fabricated PPV-CdSe bulk-
heterojunction submicron fiber. In the composite fiber, the
homogeneously dispersed CdSe nanocrystals can be in intimate
contact with PPV chains, and separate on a nanometre scale.
The photoconductive device based on the fiber showed notable
photoresponse with a switch ratio close to five orders of
magnitude, good response speed, wavelength-sensitivity, and
reproducibility. It is believed that the novel concept and the
submicron fiber we developed here will open up tremendous
opportunities for the realization of a wide range of novel high-
performance nanostructured devices, including solar cells,
photodetectors, and sensors.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant No. 20774017 and 20703020).
Notes and references
1 W. U. Huynh, J. J. Dittmer and A. P. Alivisatos, Science, 2002,
295, 2425.
2 W. T. Sun, Y. Yu, H. Y. Pan, X. F. Gao, Q. Chen and L. M. Peng,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 1124.
3 Y. Ahn, J. Dunning and J. Park, Nano Lett., 2005, 5, 1367.
4 C. Lao, Y. Li, C. P. Wong and Z. L. Wang, Nano Lett., 2007, 7,
1323.
5 D. Lin, H. Wu and W. Pan, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 3968.
6 Y. B. Guo, Q. X. Tang, H. B. Liu, Y. J. Zhang, Y. L. Li, W. P. Hu,
S. Wang and D. B. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 9198.
7 S. C. Zhang, J. H. Yu, X. G. Li and W. H. Tian, Nanotechnology,
2004, 15, 1108.
8 D. A. Czaplewski, S. S. Verbridge, J. Kameoka and
H. G. Craighead, Nano Lett., 2004, 4, 437.
9 W. U. Huynh, J. J. Dittmer, W. C. Libby, G. L. Whiting and
A. P. Alivisatos, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2003, 13, 73.
10 N. B. Colthup, L. H. Daly and S. E. Wiberley, Introduction to
Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, Hacourt Brace Jovanovich,
New York, 3rd edn, 1990, p. 371.
11 J. B. Schlenoff and L. J. Wang, Macromolecules, 1991, 24,
6653.
12 J. H. Simpson, N. Egger, M. A. Masse, D. M. Rice and
F. E. Karasz, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 1990, 28, 1859.
13 H. Skaff, K. Sill and T. Emrick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
11322.
14 M. J. Li, J. H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. F. Liu, C. L. Wang, X. Xu,
Y. Tang and B. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 3650.
15 R. D. Kennedy, A. L. Ayzner, D. D. Wanger, C. T. Day,
M. Halim, S. I. Khan, S. H. Tolbert, B. J. Schwartz and
Y. Rubin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 17290.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
2318 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2316–2318