T.M. Potewar et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 5019–5022
5021
reactions were complete in 1–2 h in water without the need of any
added catalyst or co-organic solvents at ambient temperature.
Water itself promotes the reactions. The use of water as a clean,
inexpensive, and universal solvent combines features of both eco-
nomic and environmental advantages. The amount of water used in
the reaction did not have any significant influence on the overall
rate of the reaction and yields of products. This was confirmed by
scaling up the concentration from the present 2% solids (w/v) to
20% solids (w/v) in the case of 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazole and
fanetizole, respectively. The reactions went to completion in iden-
tical times and with the same isolated yields as for the diluted
reaction mixture. This observation assumes great significance for
optimizing reactor volumes during scale-up operations. A highly
efficient stirring is required for the success of these reactions. The
role of water as the reaction medium and its mechanism are still
not clear. Water, probably due to its unique abilities such as hy-
drogen bonding, high dielectric constant, and polarity appears to be
more efficient medium for this reaction. The good results obtained
following our simple procedure are a pleasant surprise in view of
the numerous catalysts employed in organic solvents to synthesize
this class of compounds.
4.2.1. 4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N-phenethylthiazol-2-amine (3h)
White solid; mp 121–122 ꢀC; Rf (15% ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether) 0.31; IR (KBr): 3228, 3019, 2958, 1549, 1492, 1333, 758 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼2.93–3.0 (t, J¼6.9 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.51–
3.60 (q, J¼6.9 Hz, 2H, CH2N), 3.82 (s, 3H, OMe), 5.32 (br s, 1H, NH),
6.56 (s, 1H, thiazole H), 6.87–6.92 (d, J¼8.9 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.21–7.37
(m, 5H, ArH), 7.69–7.74 (d, J¼8.9 Hz, 2H, ArH); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
50 MHz): d¼35.3, 47.1, 55.2, 98.8, 113.8, 126.5, 127.2, 127.8, 128.6,
128.7, 138.4, 151.1, 159.1, 169.5. Anal. Calcd for C18H18N2OS: C, 69.65;
H, 5.84; N, 9.02%. Found: C, 69.42; H, 5.95; N, 9.11%.
4.2.2. 4-(4-Fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-amine (3i)
Yellow solid; mp 102–103 ꢀC; Rf (40% ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether) 0.52; IR (KBr): 3489, 3019, 1601, 1537, 1490, 1333, 758 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼5.04 (br s, 2H, NH2), 6.64 (s, 1H,
thiazole H), 7.01–7.09 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.70–7.77 (m, 2H, ArH); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): d¼102.1, 115.3, 115.5, 127.6, 127.6, 130.9,
150.1, 161.3, 163.3, 167.6. Anal. Calcd for C9H7FN2S: C, 55.65; H, 3.63;
N, 14.42%. Found: C, 55.73; H, 3.56; N, 14.53%.
4.2.3. N-Benzyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)thiazol-2-amine (3l)
White solid; mp 109–110 ꢀC; Rf (15% ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether) 0.42; IR (KBr): 3213, 3019, 2977, 1578, 1546, 1490, 1336,
757 cmꢂ1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼4.49–4.51 (d, J¼5.0 Hz, 2H,
CH2), 5.69 (br s, 1H, NH), 6.62 (s, 1H, thiazole H), 6.98–7.09 (m, 2H,
ArH), 7.29–7.40 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.71–7.81 (m, 2H, ArH); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 50 MHz): d¼49.7, 100.4, 115.1, 115.5, 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 127.7,
128.6, 131.08, 131.1, 137.5, 150.3, 159.8, 164.7, 169.7. Anal. Calcd for
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have described a simple, highly efficient, and
facile protocol for the synthesis of 2-aminothiazole derivatives in
water as reaction medium at ambient temperature. This process
avoids the use of highly polar and toxic volatile organic solvents
such as DMF, dioxane, and methanol, and catalyst, with the water
itself playing the dual role of a solvent and promoter. Furthermore,
the procedure offers several advantages including improved yields,
simple experimental procedure, cleaner reactions, and low cost,
which makes it a useful and attractive strategy in view of economic
and environmental advantages. The successful application of this
protocol for the preparation of the anti-inflammatory drug faneti-
zole is a significant contribution for the development of a green
commercial process for the same.
C16H13FN2S: C, 67.58; H, 4.61; N, 9.85%. Found: C, 67.72; H, 4.49; N,
9.72%.
4.2.4. 4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-N-phenethylthiazol-2-amine (3m)
White solid; mp 108–109 ꢀC; Rf (15% ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether) 0.46; IR (KBr): 3209, 3019, 2959, 1578, 1551, 1491, 1327,
757 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼2.94–3.01 (t, J¼6.9 Hz,
2H), 3.52–3.62 (q, J¼6.9 Hz, 2H), 5.21 (br s, 1H, NH), 6.62 (s, 1H,
thiazole H), 6.99–7.10 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.21–7.37 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.70–
7.80 (m, 2H, ArH); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): d¼35.3, 47.0, 100.2,
115.1, 115.5, 126.6, 127.5, 127.7, 128.6, 128.7, 131.1, 131.2, 138.3, 150.5,
159.8, 164.7, 169.4. Anal. Calcd for C17H15FN2S: C, 68.43; H, 5.07; N,
9.39%. Found: C, 68.32; H, 5.18; N, 9.51%.
4. Experimental
4.1. General
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-200
spectrometer in CDCl3 and DMSO-d6 using TMS as internal stan-
dard. Infrared spectra were recorded with ATI MATT-SON RS-1 FTIR
spectrometer using KBr pellets. Elemental analyses were obtained
using a flash EA 1112 thermofinnigan instrument. Melting points
were recorded in open capillary on Buchi melting Point B-540
apparatus. All solvents and chemicals were of research grade and
were used as obtained from Merck and Lancaster. Column chro-
matography was performed using silica gel (60–120 mesh size). Tap
water (pH¼6.7) was used for the reaction.
4.2.5. N-Methyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)thiazol-2-amine (3o)
Orange needles; mp 156–157 ꢀC; Rf (20% ethyl acetate/petro-
leum ether) 0.28; IR (KBr): 3431, 3019, 2923, 1591, 1565, 1534, 1517,
1353, 761 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼3.02–3.04 (d,
J¼5.12 Hz, 3H, Me), 5.39 (br s, 1H, NH), 6.86 (s, 1H, thiazole H), 7.48–
7.56 (t, J¼7.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.09–8.13 (dd, J¼1.9 and 7.9 Hz, 2H, ArH),
8.63–8.65 (t, J¼1.9 Hz, 1H, ArH); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): d¼32.1,
103.0, 120.8, 122.1, 129.4, 131.7, 136.5, 148.5, 149.2, 170.8. Anal. Calcd
for C10H9N3O2S: C, 51.05; H, 3.86; N,17.86%. Found: C, 51.13; H, 3.77;
N, 17.92%.
4.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 2-aminothiazoles
4.2.6. 4-(3-Nitrophenyl)-N-phenylthiazol-2-amine (3p)
Yellow solid; mp 122–124 ꢀC; Rf (20% ethyl acetate/petroleum
A mixture of phenacyl bromide 1 (1 mmol) and thiourea 2
(1.1 mmol) was stirred in water (5 mL) at room temperature under
vigorous magnetic stirring for the specified time as mentioned in
Table 1. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After
completion of the reaction, the product was extracted using ethyl
acetate (2ꢁ15 mL). The organic layer was separated from aqueous
layer. The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous mag-
nesium sulfate and evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain
the crude solid product. The crude product was further purified by
column chromatography using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether as
eluent to afford the pure product 3.
ether) 0.42; IR (KBr): 3019, 1602, 1543, 1519, 1498, 1352, 758 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d¼6.96 (s, 1H, thiazole H), 7.08–7.17 (m,
1H), 7.37–7.42 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.52–7.60 (t, J¼7.8 Hz,1H, ArH), 7.94 (br
s, 1H, NH), 8.12–8.20 (m, 2H), 8.66–8.88 (t, J¼1.8 Hz, 1H, ArH); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 50 MHz): d¼103.7, 118.6, 120.8, 122.3, 123.5, 129.4,
129.5, 131.8, 135.7, 139.8, 148.0. Anal. Calcd for C15H11N3O2S: C,
60.59; H, 3.73; N, 14.13%. Found: C, 60.48; H, 3.81; N, 14.21%.
4.2.7. N-Benzyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)thiazol-2-amine (3q)
Yellow solid; mp 102–103 ꢀC; Rf (20% ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether) 0.43; IR (KBr): 3227, 3020, 2977, 1548, 1518, 1495, 1351,