CHEMCATCHEM
FULL PAPERS
More recently, however, a new phytosqualane product has en-
tered the market. In detail, squalane is obtained from the 15-
carbon sesquiterpene trans-b-farnesene derived from sugar-
cane sucrose fermentation over genetically modified Saccharo-
myces cerevisiae yeast strains.[11]
Recently, many efforts have been devoted to develop sinter-
proof hydrogenation catalysts using preprepared colloidal
metal nanoparticles with tuned size, shape, and composition
that are then “embedded” into porous support shells.[21] The
validity of this approach was shown by McFarland and co-
workers who compared the catalytic performance of Pd parti-
cles deposited either on the outer surface of silica (Pd/SiO2) or
encapsulated within the silica inner pores (Pd@SiO2).[22]
Farnesene is first converted into squalene by catalytic dime-
rization over a Pd catalyst, and squalene is hydrogenated sub-
sequently to squalane to produce a squalane composition that
comprises squalane 92–93% and approximately 4% isosqua-
lane.[12] Trade-named Neossance, sugarcane phytosqualane has
the potential to replace both olive oil and shark squalene as
one hectare of sugarcane plantation can produce up to
2500 kg of squalane.
In this context, we have introduced a new series of catalysts
that comprises noble-metal nanocrystals encapsulated within
the sol–gel cages of mesoporous organosilica xerogels. Trade-
named SiliaCat, these sol–gel catalytic materials are highly se-
lective mediators in a number of important reactions that in-
clude the highly selective hydrogenation of functionalized ni-
troarenes,[23] olefins,[24] and vegetable oils under a H2-filled bal-
loon (1 atm H2) at room temperature.[25] Now we report that
the Pd catalyst SiliaCat Pd0 is a highly selective mediator for
the low-temperature hydrogenation of squalene, which pro-
vides industry with a suitable low-cost process to make a sub-
stance of high demand, the sourcing and production of which
have to be made sustainable.
Whatever the origin, fully saturated squalane for cosmetic
use needs to have more than 92% concentration and an
iodine value lower than 1.00 (and preferably <0.10).[13] Such
high purity levels with commercial Ni-based catalysts require
relatively harsh conditions and extensive purification of the hy-
drogenated product over silica and other adsorbent materials,
which add cost to the hydrogenated product. A typical hydro-
genation process performed in industry makes use of
0.05 wt% nickel-Kieselguhr catalyst under 4 bar of H2 pressure
at 2008C.[14] No solvent is employed and, if the squalene is
from shark-liver oil, after 3–4 h the reaction is complete. Yet, if
the squalene originates from olive oil, the inevitable presence
of residual waxes requires harsher conditions and further pu-
rification.[15] Squalene is first “winterized” to precipitate wax.
Then, the process is performed in two steps: a first 3–4 h step
under 5 bar of H2 pressure, followed by 3 h at 30 bar H2 to
afford complete saturation, followed by further purification.
During the reaction over Ni-based catalysts, extensive bond
migration and dehydrogenation of squalene takes place.[16] Yet,
as the saturation of double bonds is sought, as it is common
in the food industry,[17] low-cost Ni catalysts remain used the
most widely in commercial operations, even though extensive
purification is required to remove most Ni leached into the
squalane product to meet maximum acceptable levels of toxic
Ni compounds (Ni2+ and Ni0) in a cosmetic product (0.2 ppm;
although out of 49 cosmetic products commercialized in
Canada, all were positive for Ni with an average content of
9 ppm).[18]
Results and Discussion
We first performed a series of experiments using a commercial
squalene sample (98 wt% purity, Aldrich) aimed to identify the
best solvent for the catalytic hydrogenation of squalene over
the SiliaCat Pd0 catalyst under a H2-filled balloon (1 atm H2) at
temperatures between 22 and 508C. The results shown in
Table 1 allowed us to identify the best procedures and the
best conditions, namely, 0.5 mol% SiliaCat Pd0 in ethanol
0.50m with respect to the squalene under 1 atm H2 at 508C.
The reaction was in each case truly heterogeneous because
the recovered solution obtained after the catalyst was re-
moved by filtration at 50% substrate conversion (hot filtration
test) showed no further activity from Pd leached in solution.
The reaction slows down if the squalene hydrogenation over
SiliaCat Pd0 is performed without solvent (Table 1, Entries 14
and 15). For instance, entry 14 shows that after 24 h at 308C,
only 66% of the squalene substrate (GC–MS, MW: 410) is con-
verted, which affords a mixture of intermediate hydrogenated
products identified by GC–MS (MW: 412; 414; 416; 418). If the
reaction temperature is increased to 508C (entry 15), after 24 h
the substrate conversion increased to 98% even though the
hydrogenation reaction remained nonselective and afforded
a mixture of intermediate hydrogenated products identified by
GC–MS (MW: 418; 420).
The other hydrogenation catalyst employed on an industrial
scale is Pd/C (5 wt%, with a loading of 0.25 mmolgÀ1 Pd). The
reaction is performed at approximately 150–1608C first under
3 bar and then 70 bar of H2.[12] In each case, the reaction tem-
perature is controlled by cooling to maintain the temperature
at 150–1608C.
Clearly, there is a need for better hydrogenation catalysts to
convert squalene into squalane at low pressure and tempera-
ture, especially now that vegetable squalene is poised to re-
place squalene of animal origin entirely. A large number of
supported Pd0 catalysts for heterogeneous C=C hydrogenation
reactions have been developed and are available commercially,
which include Pd/C, Pd/CaCO3, and Pd/Al2O3.[19] However, such
surface-derivatized catalysts, used normally for the synthesis of
vitamins and other highly functionalized fine chemicals, de-
grade rapidly to further add to the cost of the product.[20]
These results are explained by the significantly lower solubil-
ity of H2 in squalene oil compared to the squalene/ethanol
mixture, and are in full agreement with outcomes shown by
entries 1–8 that show a consistent increase in the yields to
squalane by increasing the EtOH volume and the reaction tem-
perature.[26] These conditions favor a higher solubility of H2 in
the reaction mixture and increase the accessibility of the reac-
tants to the active catalytic sites dispersed throughout the in-
ternal pore structure of the catalyst.
ꢁ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 0000, 00, 1 – 7
&
2
&
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!