496
J Biol Inorg Chem (2013) 18:489–497
23
accommodated in downstream domains, allowing either
alanine or glycine to be incorporated into the siderophore.
Marine microbes have been shown to modify the
hydrophilicity of their amphiphilic siderophores by varying
the length, degree of unsaturation, and degree of hydrox-
ylation of their fatty acid appendages. The large suites of
amphiphilic siderophores that have been discovered in the
past decade indicate that there is broad selectivity for the
N-terminal fatty acid chain in the biosynthetic pathway,
and it remains to be seen if these suites confer a specific
advantage in an aqueous environment or if it is metaboli-
cally more favorable for the bacterium to incorporate a
range of fatty acid tails. These linear peptide siderophores
are produced by gammaproteobacteria isolated from the
marine environment and are produced by a number of
different genera. The continued detection of new sidero-
phores with common structural features, isolated from
numerous ocean environments, points toward an evolu-
tionary lineage to siderophore production.
O
22
N
21
OH
20
O
OH
1
19
18
H
N
H
N
3
1
R
10
9
17
11
N
H
8
2
3
O
N
2
4
H
O
12
O
13
14
4
5
HO
O
HO
O
N
N
6
15
16
7
R=
37
O
34
32
30
28
26
24
36
31
29
27
25
35
33
Fig. 7 1H and 13C number assignment for moanachelin gly-D. The
chemical structure of amphibactin D differs at the C9 alpha carbon,
where a serine group is present in contrast to the glycine depicted for
moanachelin gly-D. Therefore, the numbering is the same for C1 to
C8 and is shifted by 1 after C9 for amphibactin D because of the beta
carbon of serine (see Table 2)
Acknowledgments We thank the officers, crew, and scientific party
aboard the R/V Kilo Moana during the 2009 POOB cruise. A.B.
gratefully acknowledges support from the National Institutes of
Health (GM38130) and the National Science Foundation (CHE-
1059067). J.M.G. is supported by a National Science Foundation
Graduate Research Fellowship (2007052970).
conserved structure for the adenylation domain binding site
specificity pocket for L-serine, which would be present in
the NRPS system [19]. The glycine and alanine binding
sites, on the other hand, have not been as well character-
ized, and modeling studies indicate that they group into the
same ‘‘small cluster’’ [20]. This could indicate that they
have similar binding pockets and may substitute for one
another more readily or that there may be many degenerate
solutions for the glycine and alanine binding pockets and
multiple conformations of the binding pocket may recog-
nize these small amino acids.
References
1. Martinez JS, Haygood MG, Butler A (2001) Limnol Oceanogr
46:420–424
2. Wilson M, Abergel R, Arceneaux J, Raymond K, Byers B (2010)
Biometals 23:129–134
3. Gauglitz JM, Zhou H, Butler A (2012) J Inorg Biochem
107:90–95
4. Homann VV, Sandy M, Tincu J, Templeton A, Tebo BM, Butler
A (2009) J Nat Prod 72:884–888
5. Martin JD, Ito Y, Homann VV, Haygood MG, Butler A (2006) J
Biol Inorg Chem 11:633–641
The occurrence of bacterial peptidic secondary metab-
olites which naturally incorporate different but structurally
similar amino acids is rare. One instance is the production
of a pyoverdine siderophore with two structural variants,
whose amino acid structure differs in the incorporation of
alanine or glycine [30]. However, the substitution of gly-
cine was restricted to a specific alanine residue in the
siderophore and the glycine-containing siderophore was a
minor portion of the total siderophore production and could
not be independently isolated. In the case of the mo-
anachelins, the alanine- and glycine-containing sidero-
phores also had very similar physical properties. Flexibility
in the NRPS system may result in the production of the two
variants. Thus, it is plausible that either two separate bio-
synthetic pathways are present or that, in the case of an
NRPS system, promiscuity of the adenylation domain is
6. Martinez JS, Carter-Franklin JN, Mann EL, Martin JD, Haygood
MG, Butler A (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:3754–3759
7. Martinez JS, Zhang GP, Holt PD, Jung HT, Carrano CJ, Haygood
MG, Butler A (2000) Science 287:1245–1247
8. Snow G, White A (1969) Biochem. J 115:1031–1045
9. Vraspir JM, Holt PD, Butler A (2011) Biometals 24:85–92
10. Mawji E, Gledhill M, Milton JA, Zubkov MV, Thompson A,
Wolff GA, Achterberg EP (2011) Mar Chem 124:90–99
11. Gledhill M, McCormack P, Ussher S, Achterberg EP, Mantoura
RFC, Worsfold PJ (2004) Mar Chem 88:75–83
12. Ratledge C (2004) Tuberculosis 84:110–130
13. De Voss J, Rutter K, Schroeder B, Barry C (1999) J Bacteriol
181:4443–4451
14. Rosconi F, Davyt D, Martinez V, Martinez M, Abin-Carriquiry
JA, Zane H, Butler A, de Souza EM, Fabiano E (2013) Environ
Microbiol 15:916–927
15. Quadri L, Sello J, Keating T, Weinreb P, Walsh CT (1998) Chem
Biol 5:631–645
16. Vergne A, Walz A, Miller M (2000) Nat Prod Rep 17:99–116
123