JOURNAL OF ENZYME INHIBITION AND MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
1513
1
6
hexane, 1:1); H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ) d: 2.38 (s, 3H), 6.34 to the aboveprepared mixture and incubated again under the
(
1
(
d, 1H, J ¼ 2.4 Hz), 6.49 (dd, 1H, J1 ¼ 2.4 Hz, J2 ¼ 8.8 Hz), 7.34 (d, same experimental conditions. The reaction was stopped with the
H, J ¼ 8.8 Hz), 7.66 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.8 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 10.50 addition of 0.1 M Na CO and OD
405
was taken by a 96-well ELISA
2
3
s, 1H, OH exchanged with D O), 12.44 (s, 1H, OH exchanged with reader. The experiment was performed in triplicate. Acarbose was
2
1
3
D O); C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d ) d: 20.96 (–CH), 102.97 (Ar-C), used as positive control while DMSO was a negative control. The
2
6
1
08.94 (Ar-C), 121.64 (Ar-C), 129.96 (Ar-C), 130.04 (Ar-C), 132.08 extent of inhibition showed by the tested azo derivatives was cal-
(
Ar-C), 140.24 (Ar-C), 148.63 (Ar-C), 156.07 (C), 162.64 (C); IR (KBr, culated by % inhibition formula and IC50 (mg/mL) was determined
ꢀ
1
cm ): 3476.11 (OH, CH stretch), 1627.19 (C–C¼C), 1458.76 (N¼N). by Graph pad Prism 6.0.
HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd. For C13
12
H N
O
2 2
[M þ H] 229.09715. Found
[
M þ H] 229.09710.
2.3. Kinetic analysis of a-glucosidase inhibition
2
.1.2.7. 4-((2-chloropyridin-3-yl)diazenyl)benzene-1,3-diol (TR-7). A series of kinetic assays was performed to determine the inhib-
ꢁ
Orange-brown crystals, yield 98%; melting point: 187–189 C; R
f
ition kinetics of the most active inhibitor from the series of tested
1
32,33
(
6
(
methanol/n-hexane, 7:3); 0.80; H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
.38 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2.8 Hz), 6.56 (dd, 1H, J1 ¼ 2.4 Hz, J2 ¼ 9.2 Hz), 7.58 concentrations 0.00, 0.062, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 mM was selected for
dd, 1H, J ¼ 4.8 Hz, J2 ¼ 8.0 Hz), 7.73 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.8 Hz), 8.25 (d, 1H, kinetic studies. The substrate (pNPG) concentration was optimised
6
) d: compounds by following method
. The potential inhibitor with
J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.47 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.8 Hz), 10.94 (s, 1H, OH exchanged from 5 to 40 mM in all kinetic studies. Pre-incubation and meas-
1
3
with D O), 12.61 (s, 1H, OH exchanged with D O); C-NMR urement time was the same as discussed in a-glucosidase inhib-
2
2
(100 MHz, DMSO-d
6
) d: 103.00 (Ar-C), 110.15 (Ar-C), 124.41 (Ar-C), ition assay. The assay was continuously monitored at 405 nm for
1
1
26.05 (Ar-C), 130.57 (Ar-C), 133.46 (Ar-C), 142.85 (C), 148.07 (C), 5 min at 30 s intervals in the microplate reader after the addition
50.19 (C), 157.46 (C), 164.76 (C); IR (KBr, cm ): 3403.94 (OH, CH of the enzyme. The inhibition type on the enzyme was assayed by
ꢀ
1
stretch), 1635.34 (C–C), 1575.56 (N¼N), 1407 (C–N). HRMS (ESI, m/ Lineweaver–Burk plots of the inverse of velocities (1/V) versus the
ꢀ
1
z) Calcd. For C H ClN O
[M þ H] 250.03778. Found
11
8
3
2
inverse of substrate concentration 1/[S] mM , and the inhibition
constant K was determined by two ways (Dixon plot of 1/V versus
inhibitor concentrations) as well as secondary replot of slope ver-
[M þ H] 250.03790.
i
2
.1.2.8. 4-((2-chloropyridin-3-yl)diazenyl)naphthalen-1-ol (TR-8). sus inhibitor concentrations from Lineweaver–Burk plot.
ꢁ
Orange crystals, yield 71%, melting point: 170–175 C; R
methanol/n-hexane, 7:3); H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
6
f
¼ 0.81
) d: 6.78 (d,
H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 7.47 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 7.56–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d,
H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 8.30 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.47
1
(
1
1
(
1
(
1
(
(
[
2.4. Inhibition mechanism of potential inhibitor
The inhibitory mechanism against a-glucosidase by most active
inhibitor from the tested series of azo derivatives was investi-
gated. The plot of the remaining enzyme activity versus the con-
centrations of the enzyme at different inhibitor concentrations
1
3
t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz); C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
24.84 (Ar-C), 125.14 (Ar-C), 125.24 (Ar-C), 127.29 (Ar-C), 128.29
Ar-C), 129.34 (Ar-C), 129.73 (Ar-C), 131.58 (Ar-C), 132.31 (Ar-C),
37.16 (Ar-C), 139.87 (Ar-C), 142.81 (C), 146.46 (C), 175.47 (C); IR
6
) d: 122.11 (Ar-C),
(0.00, 0.062, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mM) was calculated.
ꢀ
1
KBr, cm ): 3301.93 (OH, CH stretch), 1631.42 (C¼C), 1513.94
N¼N), 1332 (C–N). HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd. For C H ClN O
1
5
10
3
M þ H] 284.05852. Found [M þ H] 284.05845.
2.5. In silico molecular docking
.5.1. Retrieval of a-glucosidase from protein data bank (PDB)
2
2
.1.2.9. 4-((2-chloropyridin-3-yl)diazenyl)naphthalen-2-ol (TR-9).
ꢁ
Reddish orange crystals, yield 70%; melting point: 180–182 C; R
.75 (methanol/n-hexane, 7:3); H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ) d:
f
:
1
0
6
7
6
j5t). The retrieved protein structure was minimised by using the
.79 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 7.47 (t, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 7.57–7.60 (m, 2H),
conjugate gradient algorithm and amber force field in UCSF
.72 (d, 1H, J ¼ 7.2 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.6 Hz), 8.30 (d, 1H,
34
Chimaera 1.10.1 . The stereo-chemical properties, Ramachandran
13
J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 8.48 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz); C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
6
) d:
35
graph and values of a-glucosidase were assessed by Molprobity
1
(
1
1
1
2
22.14 (Ar-C), 124.87 (Ar-C), 125.17 (Ar-C), 125.27 (Ar-C), 127.33
36
server , while the Ramachandran graph was generated by
Ar-C), 128.31 (Ar-C), 129.38 (Ar-C), 129.78 (Ar-C), 131.61 (Ar-C),
32.33 (Ar-C), 137.19 (Ar-C), 139.89 (Ar-C), 142.85 (C), 146.50 (C),
Discovery Studio 2.1 Client. The protein architecture and statistical
percentage values of helices, beta-sheets, coils and turns were
ꢀ
1
75.51 (C); IR (KBr, cm ): 3475 (OH), 1626 (C¼C), 1456 (N¼N),
37
accessed by VADAR 1.8 .
208 (C–N). HRMS (ESI, m/z) Calcd. for C H ClN O [M þ H]
15
10
3
84.05852. Found [M þ H] 284.05862.
2.5.2. In silico drugs designing
The designed ligands (TR1-9) were sketched in drawing ACD/
ChemSketch tool and retrieved in PDB format. Furthermore, the
2.2. In vitro a-glucosidase inhibition assay
The a-glucosidase inhibition assay was performed as described UCSF Chimaera 1.10.1 tool was employed to energy minimisation
3
1
previously . In summary, the stock solution of the enzyme from of each drug separately having default parameters such as steep-
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (0.2 U/mL) was prepared in 0.05 M est descent steps 100 with step size 0.02 (Å), conjugate gradient
sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.8. In microtitre plate, 70 mL of steps 100 with step size 0.02 (Å) and update interval was fixed at
phosphate buffer, 10 mL of enzyme and 10 mL of varying concen- 10. Finally, Gasteiger charges were added using Dock Prep in
trations of azo derivatives (25 mg, 12.5 mg, 6.25 mg, 3.12 mg and drugs to obtain a good structural conformation for docking ana-
ꢁ
1
.56 mg/mL) were mixed and incubated at 37 C for 15 min. After lysis. A molecular docking experiment was employed on synthes-
incubation, 10 mL of the substrate, p-nitrophenyl a-D-glucopyrano- ised ligands against a-glucosidase by using PyRx virtual screening
3
8
side (pNPG, 5 mM solution in 0.05 M phosphate buffer) was added tool with AutoDock VINA Wizard approach . The grid box centre