the benefit of a “Thorpe-Ingold” effect from the gem-diester
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Scott Virgil and Dr.
Jennifer Roizen of the California Institute of Technology for
insightful discussions, as well as Prof. Brian Stoltz and the
Caltech Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis for
access to analytical equipment. Financial support from the
California Institute of Technology is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
3
1
moiety is not required for cyclization. This result lends
support for proposed future work on an enantioselective
route, which will require the cyclization of a chiral substrate
bearing a tertiary center at C2 (salvileucalin numbering).
Homologation of arene 24 proceeded as before with use
2
1
of the Arndt-Eistert protocol to provide methyl ester 25,
which was converted in two steps to R-diazo ꢀ-ketonitrile
2
6. Heating a solution of 26 in the presence of 10 mol %
Cu(hfacac) to 150 °C under microwave irradiation for 2 min
provided cyclopropane 27 in 49% yield (Scheme 3). In this
Note Added after ASAP Publication. Scheme 3 con-
tained errors in the version published ASAP on January 20,
2010; the corrected version was posted to the web on January
2
2
2, 2010.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
Scheme 3
.
Cyclopropanation of Silyl Analogue 26
1
13
cedures and spectral data ( H and C NMR, IR, and HRMS)
for all new compounds. This material is available free of
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
OL902848K
(13) For relevant synthetic studies, see : (a) King, G. R.; Mander, L. N.;
Monck, J. C.; Zhang, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3828. (b) Morris,
J. C.; Mander, L. N.; Hockless, D. C. R. Synthesis 1998, 455.
(
14) (a) Padwa, A.; Austin, D. J.; Hornbuckle, S. F.; Semones, M. A.;
Doyle, M. P.; Protopopova, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1874. (b)
Padwa, A.; Austin, D. J.; Price, A. T.; Semones, M. A.; Doyle, M. P.;
Protopopova, M. N.; Winchester, W. R.; Tran, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
1
15, 8669.
(
15) Ojima, I.; Tzamarioudaki, M.; Li, Z.; Donovan, R. Chem. ReV. 1996,
9
6, 635.
(
(
(
16) Schore, N. E.; Najdi, S. D. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5296.
17) Trost, B. M.; Rudd, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12143.
18) Negishi, E.; Harring, L. S.; Owczarczyk, Z.; Mohamud, M. M.;
Ay, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 3243.
19) Yamamoto, Y.; Arakawa, T.; Ogawa, R.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 12143.
20) (a) Krapcho, A. P.; Mundy, B. P. Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 5437. (b)
(
(
Krapcho, A. P.; Lovey, A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 957. (c) Krapcho,
A. P. Synthesis 1982, 805.
(
21) (a) Arndt, F.; Eistert, B. Org. React. 1942, 1, 38. (b) Organic
Syntheses; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2004; Collect. Vol. 10, p 194.
1
(
22) The H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures indicate
significant quantities of isomeric C-H insertion products; however, due to
the complexity of the spectra, ratios of cylopropanation to C-H insertion
were not determined.
(
23) (a) McKervey, M. A.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Twohig, M. F. J. Chem.
case, the use of the microwave reactor significantly improved
the efficiency of the reaction; heating under similar conditions
in an oil bath to 80 °C for 6 h provided less than 5% yield
of the desired cyclopropanation product.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 129. (b) Kennedy, M.; McKervey, M. A.;
Maguire, A. R.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Twohig, M. F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1990, 1047.
(
24) Rogers, D. H.; Morris, J. C.; Roden, F. S.; Frey, B.; King, G. R.;
Russkamp, F. W.; Bell, R. A.; Mander, L. N. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68,
The studies outlined here describe a synthetic approach
that provides rapid access to the norcaradiene core of
515.
(
25) Brooks, D. W.; Lu, L. D.-L.; Masamune, S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1979, 18, 72.
II
salvileucalin B. Whereas Rh catalysts favor C-H insertion
(
26) Goddard-Borger, E. D.; Stick, R. V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3797.
II
II
products, selection of an appropriate Cu catalyst provides
(27) Exposure of R-diazo ketone 15 to Cu catalysts did not appear to
result in significant formation of the corresponding Bamford-Stevens enone
product.
synthetically useful quantities of the required norcaradiene.
These cyclopropanation reactions provide access to fully
substituted cyclopropanes, and support for the viability of
the synthetic strategy outlined in Scheme 1 for the synthesis
of salvileucalin B (1). Application of this strategy to an
enantioselective synthesis of 1 is the focus of ongoing work
in our laboratory.
(28) The most promising result for each substrate 15 and 16 is shown
in Table 2.
1
(
(
29) Determined by H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
30) Petit, M.; Chouraqui, G.; Aubert, C.; Malacria, M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5
, 2037.
(
31) (a) Beesley, R. M.; Ingold, C. K.; Thorpe, J. F. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1915, 1981. (b) Sammes, P. G.; Weller, D. J. Synthesis
1995, 1205. (c) Jung, M. E.; Pizzi, G. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1735.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 4, 2010
783