7308
M. A. Rahim et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7307–7309
UV light (365 nm, 100 W) placed at 15 cm from the
reaction mixture. We found, for the first time, that the
deprotection of the benzyl ether in 1 using 1.5 equiv of
DDQ in MeCN at room temperature during the photo-
irradiation proceeded smoothly to give the alcohol 2 in
(MOM), carbonate or isopropylidene group, or a func-
tional group, such as double or triple bond. These results
are summarized in Table 2. It was found that the depro-
tections of the benzyl ethers in 7–9 effectively proceeded,
as well as 1, to provide the corresponding alcohols in
good to high yields. In the cases of 10 and 11 possessing
an isopropylidene group and a double bond, respec-
tively, the yields were not very high and even moderate
8
8% yield. In drastic contrast, it was found that the
deprotection of the benzyl ether in 1 using DDQ in
MeCN without the photoirradiation occurred very
slightly, and the reactant 1 was recovered in more than
in the presence of BaCO . Unfortunately, it was con-
3
9
0% yield. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the
firmed that a triple bond is not a good substrate for the
deprotection reaction as shown in the reaction using
12. These unfavorable results came from the partial
deprotection of the isopropylidene group in 10, and the
generation of the significant amounts of by-products
from 11 and 12. Furthermore, as Tanemura et al. have
deprotection of the benzyl ether in 1 in MeCN during
the photoirradiation in the absence of DDQ was not
performed at all. These results clearly indicated that
the combined use of DDQ and the photoirradiation is
indispensable, and the UV light functioned as a trigger
to initiate the benzyl group deprotection using DDQ.
In addition, it was revealed that MeCN was quite super-
ior to other solvents such as MeOH, THF and PhMe.
Actually, the photodeprotection using DDQ proceeded
very slowly or did not take place at all in MeOH,
THF and PhMe.
6
demonstrated, silyl groups were readily deprotected by
DDQ with and without photoirradiation.
We finally compared the reactivity of the benzyl ether
with that of the p-methoxybenzyl ether (MPM) using
13, which had both benzyl and p-methoxybenzyl ethers,
under the stated reaction conditions (Fig. 3). p-Meth-
oxybenzyl ether is well known to be easily deprotected
With these results in hand, we investigated the scope and
limitation of the photodeprotection reaction. For this
purpose, we first examined the deprotections of the
benzyl ethers of several substances 3–6, each of which
possesses a primary or a secondary benzyl ether. These
results are summarized in Table 1. We found that all
the deprotection reactions using DDQ and photoirradi-
ation proceeded smoothly to give the corresponding
alcohols in good yields. These results also showed that
the deprotection method is applicable to not only pri-
mary benzyl ethers but also to secondary ones. In addi-
tion, it was found that the addition of BaCO3 is
sometimes effective (entries 1 and 4 in Table 1), probably
due to the quenching effect for small amounts of acidic
products coming from the minor DDQ decomposition
under the reaction conditions.
7
by DDQ in the presence of water. It was found that
the p-methoxybenzyl ether in 13 was selectively removed
using DDQ in MeCN under the photoirradiation and
anhydrous conditions within a short time to give the
monool 14 in high yield. In addition, it was confirmed
that a longer reaction time led to the deprotection of
both benzyl and p-methoxybenzyl ethers in 13 that pro-
duces the diol 15 in good yield.
The typical experimental protocol for the deprotection
of the benzyl ether in 1: To a stirred solution of 1
(0.1 mmol) in dry MeCN (15 mL) was added DDQ
(0.15 mmol). After stirring at room temperature for
4 h under the photoirradiation using a UV lamp
(365 nm, 100 W) placed at 15 cm from the reaction mix-
ture, the mixture was poured into saturated aqueous
We next tested the deprotections of the benzyl ethers
of several compounds 7–12, which possess another pro-
tecting group, such as benzoyl (Bz), methoxymethyl
NaHCO solution and then the resulting mixture was
3
extracted with CHCl . The extracts were dried over
3
anhydrous Na SO and concentrated in vacuo. Purifica-
2
4
Table 1. Photodeprotection of the benzyl ethers in 3–6 using DDQ
hν
R OBn
R OH
DDQ
MeCN, rt.
Entry
R-OBn
DDQ (equiv)
BaCO
3
(equiv)
Time/h
Yield/%
1
2
3
4
3
4
5
6
1.1
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.1
—
—
24
15
16
22
78
76
74
75
1.1
OBn
H
3
OBn
H
OBn
H
H
BnO
4
H
5
6