Y. Ren et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 463–465
465
bility of the chiral modifiers 2–5 (entries 13–16). With
chiral diol 2, a optical yield of 23% was obtained, while
the optical yield is up to 12%, as described in the previ-
Jacquet, I.; Vigneron, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15,
2
065–2068; (d) Vigneron, J. P.; Jacquet, I. Tetrahedron
1
976, 32, 939–944; (e) Terashima, S.; Tanno, N.; Koga, K.
9
Chem. Lett. 1980, 981–984.
ous paper, in asymmetric reduction of some alkyl phen-
5
6
. (a) Noyori, R.; Tomino, I.; Tanimoto, Y.; Nishizawa, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6709–6716; (b) Noyori, R.;
Tomino, I.; Yamada, M.; Nishizawa, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 6717–6725.
. Srivastava, N.; Mital, A.; Kumar, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1992, 493–494.
yl ketones or dialkyl ketones. Chiral diols 3–5 were also
used as auxiliaries in asymmetric reduction of 2-naph-
thyl phenyl ketone, but disappointing results were
obtained.
In conclusion, in this letter, some readily available chiral
diols from indene and D-mannitol were investigated as
chiral modifiers in lithium aluminum hydride reduction
of ketones, and it was discovered that the addition of
a simple a-amino alcohol resulted in a remarkable
increase in optical yield. Among the investigated chiral
modifiers, chiral diol 1 gave the highest enantioselectiv-
ities. In spite of the excellent enantioselectivities, it is
useful to search for readily available and inexpensive
reagents in enantioselective reduction.
7. (a) Zhou, H. Y.; Hou, J. G.; Chen, J.; Lu, S. J.; Fu, H. X.;
Wang, H. Q. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 543, 227–228; (b)
Zhou, H. Y.; Lu, S. J.; Hou, J. G. Chem. Lett. 1996, 339–
3
4
42; (c) Yuan, J. C.; Lu, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
069–4073; (d) Wang, A. L.; Lu, S. J.; Fu, H. X.; Wang,
H. Q.; Huang, X. Y. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 281, 301–305;
e) Lu, S. J.; Li, X. D.; Wang, A. L. Catal. Today 2000, 63,
31–536.
(
5
8
9
. Yang, X. W.; Shen, J. H.; Da, C. S.; Wang, H. S.; Su, W.;
Liu, D. X.; Wang, R.; Choi, M. C. K.; Chan, A. S. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6573–6575.
. Baggett, N.; Stribblehill, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1
977, 1123–1126.
Acknowledgements
1
0. (a) Schmid, C. R.; Bryant, J. D.; Dowlatzedah, M.;
Phillips, J. L.; Prather, D. E.; Schantz, R. D.; Sear, N. L.;
Vianco, C. S. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4056–4058; (b)
Debost, J. L.; Gelas, J.; Horton, D. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 1381–1382; (c) Yamaguchi, S.; Mosher, H. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1973, 38, 1870–1877.
The authors wish to thank National Nature Science
Foundation of China (No. 29933050) for financial
support.
1
1. In a typical experimental procedure, a-amino alcohol
(0.6 mmol) and chiral diol (0.6 mmol) were added to a
stirred solution of LiAlH4 (0.6 mmol) in diethyl ether
(4 mL) at room temperature. After 2 h, this solution was
cooled to À78 °C, a diethyl ether solution (0.5 mL) of
0.2 mmol of ketone was dropwise added. After the
reaction mixture was stirred for 10 h, the excess hydride
was decomposed by the dropwise addition of water at
À78 °C. Diethyl ether was removed under reduced
pressure, then the residue was dissolved in 6 N HCl and
extracted with diethyl ether. The organic layer was
References and notes
1
2
3
4
. (a) Valentine, D. J.; Scott, J. W. Synthesis 1978, 329–356;
b) Singh, V. K. Synthesis 1992, 605–617; (c) Corey, E. J.;
Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986–2012.
. (a) Cervinka, O. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1965, 30,
684–1691; (b) Cervinka, O.; Belovsky, O. Collect. Czech.
Chem. Commun. 1967, 32, 3897–3901.
. (a) Landor, S. R.; Miller, B. J.; Tatchell, A. R. J. Chem.
Soc. C 1966, 1822–1825; (b) Landor, S. R.; Miller, B. J.;
Tatchell, A. R. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 197–201.
(
1
successively washed with saturated NaHCO , water, and
3
. (a) Yamaguchi, S.; Mosher, H. S.; Pohland, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 9254–9255; (b) Yamaguchi, S.;
Mosher, H. S. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1870–1877; (c)
dried over Na SO . The yield and ee were determined by
GC with a chiraldex capillary column or HPLC with a
Daicel chiracel OD-H column.
2
4