Chemical Science
Edge Article
slices at specic Q values with respect to time, the kinetics the pore of a catalyst. In the present case, the fact that pore
corresponding to different length scales in the system can be liquid diffusion is critical in determining the rate of reaction is
obtained, as shown in Fig. 5b (together with correspondiꢁn1g important in understanding how the catalyst design may be
˚
exponential ts). The rst diffraction peak (Q ¼ 0.19 A
)
developed. Improvements in the surface reaction process, i.e.
exhibits both a fast (rate constant k0 ¼ 2.146 hꢁ1) and a slow increasing the number or reactivity of the active sites, will have
(k1 ¼ 0.138 hꢁ1) component, while at Q ¼ 1.2, 3.1, and 4.3 A
little inuence on the catalyst performance whereas addition of
ꢁ1
˚
the ts reveal an intermediate third rate (k2,3,4 z 0.35 hꢁ1). We a solvent, to increase the rate of diffusion, is likely to have a
have already established that the increase in intensity of the signicant promoting effect. This proof of concept study has the
rst diffraction peak is related to the change in contrast potential to enable the temporal structure/spatial changes and
between the mesoporous substrate and absorbed material; the reaction kinetics to be correlated in the future, and there-
however, a second process also contributes to this change on a fore, obtain critical information pertaining to the catalytic
ꢁ1
˚
different timescale. Inspection of the data (1 < Q < 2p A
)
process itself.
reveals no other changes which occur at a rate similar to the fast
component (k0). This rst process is, therefore, unlikely to be
related to benzene and is attributed to the dissociative
adsorption of D2. This is consistent with the rapid and relatively
large increase in temperature over the rst 30 minutes following
introduction of the D2, Fig. 5c. Similarly, the slow component
(k1) does not reect a chemical change and is likely to be related
to the mass transport of the productsꢁw1ithin the pore, i.e. pore
Conclusions
The kinetics within the pores of a heterogeneous catalyst during
the liquid phase reduction of benzene have been probed
directly using neutron diffraction, potentially providing a
method of examining structure-reactivity correlations for these
complex systems in detail, and thus allowing the effects of mass
transport within the catalyst and surface reaction to be decou-
pled. Moreover, the technique takes a step to allow both struc-
tural and spatial data to be tied effectively with the kinetics of
the underlying processes.
˚
diffusion. The change at Q ¼ 1.22 A reects nearest-neigꢁh1-
˚
bour molecular interactions, while those at Q ¼ 3.1 and 4.3 A
are associated with atomistic chemical changes within the
system. These three features evolve with similar time constants
and are correlated with the reduction process and the formation
of the cyclohexane product. Moreover, these time constants
suggest that the overall process is likely to be limited by liquid
diffusion (k1), as this is the slowest rate observed, whilst the
Acknowledgements
We thank the EPSRC and Johnson Matthey for funding under the
CasTech project; M. Kibble and P. Hawkins for support during
neutron diffraction experiments. Experiments at the ISIS Pulsed
Neutron and Muon Source were supported by a beamtime allo-
cation from the Science and Technology Facilities Council
(experiment RB1220486, DOI: 10.5286/ISIS.E.24089729).
reaction itself is governed by the hydrogenation process (k2,3,4
)
rather than the dissociation of D2 (k0). From these results we are
able to elucidate the following process scheme for the reaction,
at conditions of room temperature and 250 mBar D2:
D2(g) / 2D(ads), k0 ¼ 2.146 hꢁ1
Notes and references
1 Z. Ma and F. Zaera, Heterogeneous Catalysis by Metals in
Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley, 2006.
2 F. Zaera, Catal. Lett., 2012, 142, 501.
C6D12(l) pore diffusion, k1 ¼ 0.136 hꢁ1
3 E. H. L. Yuen, A. J. Sederman and L. F. Gladden, Appl. Catal.,
A, 2002, 232, 29.
4 D. Weber, D. J. Holland and L. F. Gladden, Appl. Catal., A,
2011, 392, 192.
Discussion
The necessity for more detailed information with respect to the
kinetic evaluation of catalysts has been known for many years.23
For example, there is a need to replace the ubiquitous concept
5 J. Adelsberger, So Matter, 2013, 9, 1685.
´
6 F. Michaux, N. Baccile, M. Imperor-Clerc, L. Malfatti,
of ‘turnover frequency’ (TOF) with
a
more quantitative
N. Folliet, C. Gervais, S. Manet, F. Meneau, J. S. Pedersen
and F. Babonneau, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 17477.
measure24 preferably with one whereby the rate equation for the
system is known.25 Such characterization has, in the past, been
difficult, especially for liquid phase heterogeneously catalyzed
processes since the rate law commonly contains several
processes including both surface reaction and mass transport.
Each has distinct rate constants, and no single technique has
been able to comprehensively provide the necessary informa-
tion. With this study total neutron scattering has been shown to
be able to provide simultaneously the kinetic information
associated with chemical reaction and mass transport within
7 L. Gentile, B. F. B. Silva, S. Lages, K. Mortensen,
J. Kohlbrecher and U. Olsson, So Matter, 2013, 9, 1133.
8 R. Motokawa, T. Taniguchi, Y. Sasaki, Y. Enomoto,
F. Murakami, M. Kasuya, M. Kohri and T. Nakahira,
Macromolecules, 2012, 45, 9435.
9 J. Bu, J. L. Liu, X. Y. Chen, J. H. Zhuang, S. R. Yan, M. H. Qiao,
H. Y. He and K. N. Fan, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 2612;
J. L. Liu, L. J. Zhu, Y. Pei, J. H. Zhuang, H. Li, H. X. Li,
M. H. Qiao and K. N. Fan, Appl. Catal., A, 2009, 353, 282.
3488 | Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 3484–3489
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013