220
E. Martins Barros de Sousa et al. / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 60 (1999) 211–221
the presence of micro and mesopores decreases, but the contri-
bution of the mesopore area to the total surface becomes
progressively bigger. These results can be attributed to the
large number of micropores present in the samples treated at
low temperature. As the sample is heated from 900ЊC, a large
decrease of the micropore volume in the gel occurs, without
altering significantly the amount of the mesopore.
porosimetry provided suitable data for characterization of
the samples studied and proved to be complementary tech-
niques used to better understand the structural evolution of
these materials.
As the positron probe is able to investigate all the pores,
even though not connected to the surface of the crystals, and
particularly the narrow pores, the average pore radius
measured by PALS is the lowest among these three techni-
ques. The shrinkage of the pores observed by BET and
mercury porosimetry at 900ЊC and further at 1100ЊC trans-
The distribution of pore volume of the different materials
with respect to pore size obtained by BET (Figs. 8 and 9 )
presents some important features. The average pore size of
all samples treated up to 900ЊC is very small, ranging from
˚
forms the large pores into little free volumes of nearly 2 A or
˚
˚
12 to 17 A, and approximately 5 A for those treated at
less. This appears to be more efficient at inducing Ps forma-
tion when compared with the large pores, considering the
higher o-Ps intensity observed at the higher firing tempera-
ture. This conclusion implies that Ps is formed inside the
silica particles and then migrates toward the pores, where it
survives.
1100ЊC. Equally important, the distribution is very narrow
˚
with the maximum value not exceeding 80 A. That is, the
mesopores present in the material are only 5 times the size of
the average micropore. Mercury porosimetry confirms this
˚
fact. Samples containing pore sizes above 30 A can be
analyzed via this technique. The behavior was similar for
all the samples.
The XRD patterns indicate that for the samples prepared
from CuSO4, the formation of CuO occurs at 900ЊC and the
evolution to Cu2O at 1100ЊC. In the case of CuCl samples, it
occurs only after the formation of CuO at 900 and 1100ЊC.
For temperatures lower than 500ЊC, an amorphous material
is formed. The data showed the significant evolution for the
crystalline phases of the silica of cristobalite and quartz at
1100ЊC.
By analyzing the results obtained by mercury porosimetry
for the different materials, it is observed that for those for
pure silica, the variation in the pore size distribution occurs
in such a way that the total volume of pores decreases while
˚
the average pore size remains fairly constant, around 50 A,
as densification proceeds. At 900ЊC the samples suffer a
strong densification process, according to Fig. 10.
The samples doped with different salt content behave
similarly to the matrix. This presents an average pore size
of approx. 60 A, and a strong drop of the pore volume occurs
Acknowledgements
˚
at 900ЊC. These results can be observed in Fig. 11.
This behavior was similar for all the samples doped with
different copper contents. However, the values of the density
and surface area are different for each sample. The differ-
ence in the densification process can be attributed to differ-
ences in the degree of crosslinking that occurred as a result
of the combination of the silanol groups (Si-OH) on the pore
surface with the liberation of H2O and the formation of Si–
O–Si bonds.
Molecular water can be removed at relatively a low
temperature, but hydroxyl groups were only removed in
the range 800–1000ЊC. It was observed that the gel bloated
or cracked into fine pieces around 800ЊC when heating was
performed as initially proposed. This suggests that there is a
critical temperature for water removal at approx. 800ЊC.
The proposed procedure for the heat treatment from 900
to 1100ЊC (heating rate of 10ЊC/min from 150ЊC) leads to
closure of the pores with trap water, organic residues, and
carbon causing bloating. In this way, careful heat treatment
around this temperature was conducted to try to obtain bulk
glass.
This work has been supported by CNPq, FAPEMIG and
PADCT. The authors thank Walter de Brito of CDTN/
CNEN for the XRD measurements.
References
[1] L.L. Hench, J.K. West, The sol–gel process, Chem. Rev. 9
(1990) 33.
[2] C.J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, Sol–Gel Science. Academic
Press, San Diego, CA, 1990, p. 908.
[3] M. Toki, S. Miyashita, T. Takeuchi, S. Kanbe, A. Kochi, A
large-size silica glass produced by a new sol-gel process, J.
Non-Crystalline Solids 100 (1988) 482.
[4] J.L. Nogues, W.V. Moreshead, Porous gel-silica, a matrix for
optically active components, J. Non-Crystalline Solids 121
(1990) 142.
[5] W.W. Adams, S. Kumar, Structure processing of advanced
materials, in: D.R. Ulhmann, D.R. Ulrich (Eds.), Conventional
and Molecular Composites—Past, Present, and Future, 1st
ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992.
[6] A.J. Rouco, TPR study of Al2O3- and SiO2-supported CuCl2
catalysts, Appl. Catalysts A: General 117 (1994) 149.
[7] A.K. Neyestanaki, N. Kumar, L.E. Lindfors, Catalytic
combustion of propane and natural gas over Cu and Pd modi-
fied ZSM zeolite catalysts, Appl. Catalysts B: Environmental
7 (1995) 111.
4. Conclusions
A sol–gel process has been successfully employed to
prepare Cu-doped silica gels. EVMP, BET and mercury
[8] F.Th. van de Scheur, et al., Structure–activity relation and
ethane formation in the hydrogenolysis of methyl acetate on