L. Brichard, F. I. Aigbirhio
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Table 2. Radiochemical conversion yields for the synthesis of vari-
ous [18F]-labelled compounds using [18F]Et4NF.
– It does not require the use of any additional, poten-
tially toxic, reagents to enhance the reaction efficiency.
– It is a cheaper and convenient alternative to the use of
the classical K222 as a phase transfer agent.
Entry [18F] compound Solvent Water content
RCC[b]
[%][a]
(%ϮStD)[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1[d]
2[e]
3[f]
4[g]
5[h]
6[i]
MeCN
DMF
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
65Ϯ2.6
76Ϯ5.3
73Ϯ5.3
72Ϯ5.1
68Ϯ5.1
70Ϯ2.8
53Ϯ1.0
58Ϯ1.5
56Ϯ0.6
55Ϯ2.3
51Ϯ2.1
45Ϯ5.5
86Ϯ4.6
85Ϯ4.6
87Ϯ1.5
85Ϯ3.5
85Ϯ1.7
83Ϯ4.3
93Ϯ1.4
94Ϯ0.9
90Ϯ0.6
90Ϯ3.0
91Ϯ0.6
82Ϯ1.5
not done
not done
73Ϯ1.1
75Ϯ3.2
79Ϯ3.8
79Ϯ5.3
not done
not done
85Ϯ1.5
81Ϯ2.6
77Ϯ0.6
67Ϯ1.5
– It has the flexibility to be applied to a range of syn-
thetic pathway for [18F]-labelled compounds.
In essence, due to its simplicity, versatility and high ra-
diochemical yields, this is a method that can be readily
applied in all radiochemical laboratories and translated on
automated radiosynthesis systems to become a standard
approach for [18F]fluorination.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Experimental Section
DMF
In a typical procedure, [18F]fluoride is extracted from its water ma-
trix by passing it through a preconditioned QMA cartridge (carb-
onate form, Waters). At the end of the trapping, the solid support
is rinsed with 5 mL of a dry solvent (hexane or DMSO) in order
to remove excess water. The [18F]fluoride is then eluted with 1 mL
of a solution of Et4NHCO3 (15 mg) in a polar aprotic solvent
(MeCN, DMF or DMSO) either dry or containing additional
water (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 or 5% in volume). Aliquots of these eluted
solutions (50–100 μL) are subsequently mixed in a 1 mL v-vial with
aliquots (70–100 μL) of the appropriate precursor (0.42–8 mg) in
solution in the same solvent as the eluent used. The reactor is then
capped and heated for a selected time (5–20 min) at various tem-
peratures (95–175 °C). At the end of the labelling reaction, the reac-
tor is cooled and a sample (20 μL) is taken for analysis by High
Performance Liquid Chromatography to determine the radiochem-
ical conversion.
MeCN
DMSO
DMSO
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Details of experimental procedures for the synthesis of all
[18F]-labelled compounds including radioHPLC profiles.
5
[a] Water content in the eluate from Table 1. [b] RCC: Radiochemi-
cal conversion determined by radioHPLC based on [18F]com-
pounds dissolved in the reaction mixture (a maximum of 5% of
the radioactivity is lost on the wall of the reaction vessel). [c]
Average of 3 experiments. [d] Precursor: OTf, 115 °C, 10 min. [e]
Precursor: OTs, 175 °C, 5 min. [f] Precursor: OTs, 135 °C, 20 min.
[g] Precursor: OTs, 95 °C, 15 min. [h] Precursor: NO2, 150 °C,
15 min. [i] Precursor: NO2, 150 °C, 15 min.
[1] a) P. W. Miller, N. J. Long, A. D. Gee, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 8998; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 9136–9172; b) S. M.
Ametamey, M. Horner, P. A. Schubiger, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108,
1501.
[2] G. R. Morais, R. A. Falconer, I. Santos, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2013, 1401.
[3] M. M. Alauddin, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2013, 56,
237.
[4] M. Wuest, F. Wuest, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2013, 56,
244.
[5] P. H. Elsinga, H. Kentaro, K. Ishiwata, Curr. Med. Chem. 2006,
13, 2139.
Conclusions
[6] a) D. J. Veltman, H. G. Ruhe, J. Booij, Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010,
16, 1979; b) A. Saulin, M. Savli, R. Lanzerberger, Amino Acids
2012, 42, 2039.
[7] C. Hollingworth, V. Gouverneur, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
2929.
In conclusion, we have described a new and efficient
method for radiofluorination that can be applied to a wide
variety of [18F]-labelled compounds via aliphatic or aro-
matic nucleophilic substitution in various solvents and [8] B. S. Moon, K. C. Lee, G. I. An, D. Y. Chi, S. D. Yang, C. W.
Choi, S. M. Lim, K. S. Chun, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm.
without the need for an additional azeotropic drying step
as it is classically required for F-18 nucleophilic radiochem-
istry. In particular, our method greatly simplifies the pro-
2006, 49, 287.
[9] R. Bejot, T. Fowler, L. Carrol, S. Boldon, J. E. Moore, J. De-
clerck, V. Gouverneur, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 586;
Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 594.
duction process for F-18 radiotracers in various ways:
– It is simple to automate, leading to a more reliable syn-
thesis on a routine basis.
[10] N. Elander, J. R. Jones, S.-Y. Lu, S. Stone-Elander, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2000, 29, 239.
[11] M. A. Elizarov, Lab Chip 2009, 9, 1326.
[12] C. Lemaire, J. J. Aerts, S. Voccia, L. C. Libert, F. Mercier, D.
Goblet, A. R. Plenevaux, A. Luxen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 3161; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 3229.
– The [18F]fluoride always stays in solution therefore
minimising the losses of activity occurring when using the
standard drying method with K222/K2CO3.[20]
6148
www.eurjoc.org
© 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 6145–6149