T. Hasegawa et al. / Phytochemistry 69 (2008) 1419–1424
1423
MeOH were subjected to ODS cc with a step-wise gradient
of aqueous MeOH (10, 30, 50, 70 and 100%), to give nine
fractions. A biologically active fraction 4 (3.5 g) was fur-
ther separated by silica gel cc with a step-wise gradient of
CHCl3 and MeOH (7:1, 5:1, 3:1, 2:1 and 0:1), to give four
fractions. Fraction 1 (440 mg) was applied to a Sephadex
LH-20 column with MeOH, and H2O (1:1, v/v) as eluent,
then further purified by ODS HPLC with CH3CN H2O
(1:4, v/v) to give kurilensin A (1) (20.0 mg) and kurilensin
B (2) (3.6 mg). Fraction 3 (168 mg) was purified by Sepha-
dex LH-20 cc with MeOH H2O (1:1, v/v) and further puri-
fied by ODS HPLC with CH3CN in H2O (1:3, v/v) to give
tricin-40-O-b-D-glucopyranoside (3) (0.4 mg) and tricin-5-
O-b-D-glucopyranoside (4) (5.8 mg).
Chemical Industries, 4.6 ꢁ 250 mm; MeOH, 1.0 ml/min;
UV detection at 254 nm). The retention time of each of
the benzoyl derivatives of the hydrolysis products of 1 or
2 was found to be 8.2 and 9.1 min, respectively. Further-
more, the retention times of synthetic benzoyl derivatives
of L-rhamnopyranose (5), D-xylopyranose (6) and L-xylopy-
ranose were found to be 8.2 and 9.1 and 8.6 min,
respectively.
3.7. L-rhamnopyranose tetrabenzoate (5) and
D-xylopyranose tetrabenzoate (6)
Benzoyl chloride (0.5 ml) was added to each ice-cooled
solution of ether L-rhamonopyranose (18.0 mg) or D-xylo-
pyranose (15.0 mg) in dry pyridine (1.0 ml), and each mix-
ture was stirred at room temperature for 15 h. MeOH
(1.0 ml) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture, stir-
red for 30 min, and then diluted with EtOAc and aqueous
Na2CO3, and the layers were separated. Each organic layer
was washed with brine, and the combined aqueous layers
for each were extracted with EtOAc. Each combined
organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, and concentrated,
was the corresponding residual dark brown oil were indi-
vidually purified by silica gel cc (eluting with hexane/
EtOAc 5:1) to give either 5 (53 mg, 91%) or 6 (52 mg,
92%) as a colorless oil, respectively. 5: [a]D + 75.0 (CHCl3;
c 1.6); 1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.44 (3H, d,
J = 6.4 Hz), 4.37 (1H, dd, J = 6.4, 9.8 Hz), 5.81 (1H, t,
J = 9.8 Hz), 5.88 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 3.4 Hz), 6.00 (1H, dd,
J = 3.4, 10.3 Hz), 6.57 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.27–8.21
(20H, m); 13C NMR (67.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 17.7, 69.3,
69.7, 69.8, 71.1, 91.3, 128.3, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7, 128.8,
128.8, 129.0, 129.7, 129.7, 130.0, 130.1, 130.1, 133.3,
133.4, 133.6, 133.9, 164.0, 165.3, 165.6, 165.7; EIMS m/z
580 [M]+.
3.4. Kurilensin A (1)
Amorphous yellow powder; [a]D–34.0 (MeOH, c 0.13);
UV (MeOH) kmax (loge) 350 (3.9), 292 (3.5) nm; IR mmax
(KBr) 2988, 2862, 2783, 2517, 1506, 1474, 1458, 1398,
1339, 1115, 1051, 1005 cm–1; for 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CD3OD) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) spectroscopic
data, see Table 1; HRFABMS m/z 563.1424 [MꢀH]ꢀ (cal-
culated for C26H27O14, 563.1422).
3.5. Kurilensin B (2)
Amorphous yellow powder; [a]D–28.1 (MeOH, c 0.11);
UV (MeOH) kmax (loge) 349 (3.8), 292 (3.5) nm; IR mmax
(KBr) 3734, 2824, 2519, 2235, 2046, 1717, 1420, 1115,
1009 cm–1; for 1HNMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) and 13CNMR
(125 MHz, CD3OD) spectroscopic data, see Table 1;
HRFABMS m/z 549.1200 [MꢀH]ꢀ (calculated for
C25H25O14, 549.1204).
3.6. Determination of stereochemistry of the secondary sugar
unit in 1 and 2 by chiral HPLC
6: 1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3) d 3.97 (1H, t,
J = 10.7 Hz), 4.23 (1H, dd, J = 5.4, 10.7 Hz), 5.48 (1H,
m), 5.57 (1 H, dd, J = 3.4, 10.3 Hz), 6.21 (1H, t,
J = 10.3 Hz), 6.70 (1H, d, J = 3.9 Hz), 7.15–7.57 (12H,
m), 7.79–8.08 (8H, m); 13C NMR (67.5 MHz, CDCl3) d
61.2, 69.4, 69.9, 70.2, 90.2, 128.4, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7,
128.8, 128.9, 129.0, 129.7, 129.8, 129.8, 129.9, 133.3,
133.4, 133.5, 133.8, 164.5, 165.3, 165.4, 165.8; EIMS m/z
566 [M]+.
Compound 1 or 2 (2.0 mg) in MeOH (0.5 ml) was trea-
ted with 6 N HCl (3.0 ml) for 24 h at 80 °C, and evapo-
rated. Each residue was purified by Sephadex LH-20 cc
(eluting with H2O (1:9, v/v) MeOH ? MeOH) to give agly-
cones and sugar moieties, respectively. Benzoyl chloride
(0.1 ml) was added to the ice-cooled solution of each sugar
moiety in dry pyridine (0.5 ml), and each mixture was stir-
red at room temperature for 40 h. MeOH (0.1 ml) was
added dropwise to each of the reaction mixtures, stirred
for 30 min, and then diluted with EtOAc and aqueous
Na2CO3, and the layers were separated. Each organic layer
was washed with brine, and the combined aqueous layers
were extracted with EtOAc. Each of the combined organic
extracts were dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. Each
residual dark brown oil was purified by silica gel cc (eluting
with hexane/EtOAc 5:1) to give the corresponding benzoyl
derivatives of the sugar moieties. The benzoyl derivatives
of each hydrolysis products of 1 or 2 were subjected to
chiral HPLC analyses using CHIRALPAK IB (Daisel
3.8. DPPH radical scavenging activity
The DPPH assay was performed by a method previously
reported by Marsden (1958) and Zhang et al. (2007). In
brief, 100 ll test samples at different concentrations in
MeOH and 8.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M DPPH (Wako) in MeOH
(300 ll) were added to a 96-well microtiter plate. The plate
was shaken for 1 min on a plate shaker, and incubated for
30 min at room temperature in the dark. After incubation,
the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. The tested samples
at different concentrations without DPPH solution were
used as a blank control to eliminate the influence of sample