Communications
The synthesis began with trans-4-hydroxyproline
7
(Scheme 2), which was protected at the nitrogen atom by a
Boc group and then transformed under Mitsunobu condi-
tions[15] into the crystalline bicyclic lactone 8 with an inverted
Scheme 3. Preparation of bisthiazole peptide 21. Reagents and condi-
tions: a) TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 0!208C, 1 h; b) Fmoc(tBu)ThrOH, EDC,
HOBt, CH2Cl2/DMF (10:1), 0!208C, 4 h; c) o-NO2C6H4SeCN
(2 equiv), PBu3 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 208C, 16 h; d) 1% H2O2, 208C,
30 min; e) [Pd(PPh3)4], PhSiH3 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 208C, 10 min; f) 15,
HOBt, EDC, 0!208C, 5 h; g) 1% DBU, 5% piperidine in CH2Cl2, 08C,
30 min; h) 50% TFA, 0!208C, 20 min.
mediated deallylation under neutral reaction conditions[18]
then provided acid 20, which was coupled to amine 15 and
delivered segment 4 (58%). Removal of the Fmoc group
provided amine 21, which was ready for extension (96%).
The hydroxypyridine core was elaborated by a hetero-
Diels–Alder cycloaddition.[13] The regiochemistry was
unequivocally established by X-ray crystal structure analysis
of ketone 22,[14] which was then converted into bisthiazolyl
pyridine 5 by a racemization-free Hantzsch annelation
(Scheme 4).[13a] The hydrolysis of diester 5 initially proved
nonselective under a variety of reaction conditions. We found,
Scheme 2. Synthesis of thiazole amine 15. Reagents and conditions:
a) Boc2O, 10% K2CO3, 1,4-dioxane, 0!208C, 8 h; b) diisopropylazodi-
carboxylate (1.1 equiv), PPh3 (1 equiv), THF, 08C, 4 h; c) TceOH
(4 equiv), NaH, THF, ꢀ788C, 1 h; d) TBSCl, DMF, 208C, 6 h; e) RuCl3
(1 mol%), NaIO4 (3 equiv), CCl4/CH3CN/H2O (1:9:15), 08C, 8 h;
f) BnOH, NaH, THF, ꢀ788C; g) Zn0, THF, NaH2PO4 (20 mm, pH 7.0),
ultrasound, 16 h; h) EDC, HOBt, 13, CH2Cl2, 08C, 2 h; i) PPh3, THF,
ꢀ20!208C, 4 h; j) BrCCl3, DBU, CH2Cl2, 4 h; k) TFA/CH2Cl2, 1:2, 08C,
30 min. DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, DMF=N,N-dime-
thylformamide, EDC=N-ethyl-N’-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodi-
imide, HOBt=1-hydroxybenzotriazole, Tce=trichloroethyl, THF=
tetrahydrofuran, TFA=trifluoroacetic acid.
[19]
however, that catalytic amounts of Sc(OTf)3 removed the
methyl ester group on the pyridine ring selectively if a free
hydroxy group at C3 was present (23!24).[20] The synthesis
was initially carried on with the mandatory[13a] Boc-protected
thioaminal group, but all attempts to unmask the cysteine
residue at a later stage in the synthesis were unsuccessful.
Therefore, the thioaminal 24 had to be cleaved at this stage.
The free thiol was captured with TrCl, and an Alloc group was
introduced on the nitrogen atom (!25, 82%).
configuration (62%). Compound 8 was transesterified with
TceOH, protected with a TBS group (!9, 69%), and
regioselectively oxidized to lactam 10 (76%) using a catalytic
amount of RuO4.[16] Ring opening of 10 was achieved with
NaOBn at low temperature (87%). The resulting orthogo-
nally protected 4-hydroxyglutamate 11 was converted into
acid 12 by reduction with Zn0. Thioester formation with
azidothiol 13,[12] aza-Wittig ring closure with PPh3, and
oxidation delivered building block 14 in excellent yield and
purity (79%, d.r. > 98:2), which was swiftly converted into the
labile amine 15 by removal of the protecting groups.
Furthermore, threonine 16 was converted into thiazole 17
by using an aza-Wittig reaction (89%; Scheme 3).[12] Removal
of the tBu and Boc groups and subsequent selective chain
extension at the nitrogen atom was carried out on Fmoc-
protected Thr using EDC/HOBt (!18, 99%). We found that
the crucial enamide could be cleanly installed by using the
method developed by Grieco et al. (!19, 90%).[17] In
contrast, activation of the OH group (Ms, Ts) and elimination
(DBU, DMAP) gave 19 with inferior results. Palladium-
To install the side chain, the hydroxy acid 25 was activated
with phosgene and treated with peptide thiol 6, which was
prepared in situ from the stable peptide 26 (5% TFA, quant.).
Immediate aza-Wittig ring closure gave the thiazoline, which
was directly oxidized to the tris-thiazolyl pyridine 27 (46%,
over 4 steps). Protection of the hydroxy group at C3 using a
sulfonate group had to be carefully controlled (!28, 80%
based on recovered starting material), then acid 29 was
released using Me3SnOH.[21] Coupling of 29 to amine 21
proved challenging under many reaction conditions, but
reliable transformation into 30 was achieved with DEPBT
as the activating reagent (87%; 47% after preparative
HPLC).[22] Parallel removal of the allyl-based protecting
groups could then be cleanly achieved—despite the sulfur-
rich substrate 30—with Pd0/PhSiH3 under neutral reaction
conditions (99%).
8138
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8137 –8140