K. Rajesh et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 77 (2010) 652–660
653
only non selective binding is observed, and the small variations may
be attributed to distortions in the porphyrin skeleton. The second
concept is that interactions as weak as CH– interactions can con-
tribute to enhance the affinity of the receptor for an aromatic axial
ligand in the cases of trans-␣2 atropoisomers. The most common
approach, first used by Groves and Meyers [14], which involves
attaching chiral units to preformed porphyrins such as amino- or
hydroxy-substituted TPP derivatives.
Picket-fence porphyrin Fe(II) and Co(II) complexes, developed
by Collman et al. is an excellent model of natural hemoproteins,
and their static and dynamic properties have been studied exten-
sively by using a variety of physicochemical methods [15,16]. These
differences in chemical properties among these isomers.
Porphyrin-based compounds exert antibacterial action against
the sexually transmitted pathogens Neisseria gonorrhoeae and
Haemophilus ducreyi [17]. A survey of the literature showed that
the metalloporphyrins are relatively unstudied for their potential
antimicrobial and anticancer activity for exploitation in medicine
and industry. Only a handful of these metalloporphyrins have been
completely studied for their biological activity.
Fig. 1. Synthesis of 2,6-bis(4-methylpiperazine-1-yl-methyl)-4-formylphenol (L).
2.2. Synthesis of 2,6-bis(4-methylpiperazine-1-yl-methyl)-4-
formylphenol (L)
The Mannich reaction [18] was carried out by taking p-
hydroxybenzaldehyde (4.27 g, 35 mmol) in methanol (150 ml) and
para-formaldehyde (2.21 g, 70 mmol) was added slowly with stir-
ring and then it was heated to reflux for 1 h. To this solution
N-methylpiperazine (7.76 ml, 70 mmol) was added and heated to
reflux for 24 h. The solvent was evaporated to half the volume and
the resulting solution was neutralized with 5% Na2CO3 solution and
extracted with chloroform. The chloroform extract was dried with
anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated to dryness, dried with
diethyl ether. Yield. 8.1 g (Fig. 1). Molecular formula: C19H30N4O2,
Molecular weight: 346 Calculated (%): C, 65.87; H, 8.73; N, 16.17;
Found (%): C, 65.94; H, 8.62; N, 16.23; Mass (EI) m/z: 346 (M+);
Selected IR data (KBr disc, ꢀ/cm−1): 1682 ꢀ(C O), 3446 ꢀ(OH), 1458
ꢀ(–N–CH3); 1H NMR (ı ppm in CDCl3): ∼2.22 (s, 6H, N–CH3), ∼2.45
(br s, 16H, methylene protons), ∼3.64 (s, 4H, benzylic protons), 7.7
(s, 1H, phenolic OH) ∼7.3 (s, 2H, aromatic protons), ∼9.8 (s, 1H,
aldehyde proton).
The present study focused on screening the picket-fence por-
phyrin complexes for their potential in antibacterial, antifungal and
anticancer activity against human pathogenic bacteria, fungi and
some human cancer cell lines.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and methods
o-Nitrobenzaldehyde (AR), p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, para-
formaldehyde (AR), nitrobenzene (AR), tin(II) chloride (AR),
N-methylpiperazine (AR) and dichloromethane were purchased
from Qualigens chemicals. Solvents were purified according to
standard procedure and stored over molecular sieves.
2.3. Synthesis of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis[˛,˛,˛,˛-2-(2,6-bis(4-methyl
piperazine-1-yl-methyl)-4-iminomethyl phenol)phenyl]
porphyrin [(˛4-TNH2PP)L]
IR spectra of the compounds were recorded on Schimadzu
FT-IR 8300 series instrument using potassium bromide pellets.
The IR spectra were recorded in the region 400–4000 cm−1. The
UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Hitachi 320 double beam
spectrophotometer. The concentration of the samples used for
these measurements ranged from ∼2 × 10−6 M (Soret band) to
∼5 × 10−4 M (Q bands). The emission spectra were recorded on
a Perkin-Elmer LS-5B fluorescence spectrophotometer. Fluores-
cence lifetime measurements were carried out in a Picosecond
laser excited, time-correlated single-photon counting spectropho-
tometer. The excitation source is a tunable Ti-sapphire (TSUNAMI,
SPECTRA PHYSICS, USA). The photons were counted by a MCP-
PMT (Hamamatso-4878) and the data were analyzed by IBM
software. The C, H, N contents of the porphyrins and their com-
plexes were carried out using a Carl Erba Elemental analyzer Model
1106. The FAB-MS spectra were recorded on a Jeol SX 102/DA-
6000 mass spectrometer using p-nitrobenzyl alcohol (NBA) matrix
and EI-MS spectra on Jeol DX-303 mass spectrometer. Electro-
chemical measurements were performed at room temperature.
The cyclic voltammograms of 10−3 M solution of complexes in
dichloromethane were obtained on a CHI 600A electrochemical
analyzer. The measurements were carried out under oxygen free
conditions using a three-electrode cell in which a glassy carbon
electrode was the working electrode, a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode
was the reference electrode and a platinum wire was used as the
auxiliary electrode. Tetra(n-butyl)ammonium perchlorate (TBAP)
was used as the supporting electrolyte. Antifungal and antibacte-
rial activities of the complexes were tested by the cup plate method
using nutrient agar.
5,10,15,20-Tetra(␣,␣,␣,␣-2-aminopheny1)-porphyrin [19] (␣4-
TNH2PPH2) (1.2 g, 1.7 mmol) and 2,6-bis(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl-
methyl)-4-formylphenol (L) (2.46 g, 7.1 mmol) were dissolved in
reflux for 8 h. The resulting solution was evaporated to get the
crude product. This was then dissolved in dichloromethane and
chromatographed over silica gel. The title compound was isolated
by removal of the solvent from the first fraction and dried in
vacuum. Yield 0.78 g (Fig. 2). Analytical data for C120H146N24O4;
Formula weight: 1988.18; Calculated (%): C, 72.48; H, 7.39; N,
16.89. Found (%): C, 72.39; H, 7.31; N, 16.80. UV–vis (CH2Cl2, nm)
419 (4.92) (Soret band), 514 (3.88), 552 (3.28), 591 (3.10), 647
(2.98) (Q-band), Fluorescence (CH2Cl2, nm) 660,720; 1H NMR (in
ppm relative to TMS, CDCl3): 8.92 (s, 8H, -pyrrole), 7.98 (d, 8H,
3,6-(4-aminophenyl)), 7.02 (d, 8H, 4,5-(4-aminophenyl)), 8.85 (s,
4H, imine), ∼2.20 (s, 24H, N–CH3), ∼2.44 (br s, 64H, methylene
protons), ∼3.65 (s, 16H, benzylic protons), ∼7.2 (s, 8H, aromatic
protons), ∼9.8 (s, 4H, phenolic OH), −2.75 (s, 2H, pyrrole NH).
Selected IR (KBr, ꢀ/cm−1) 3319 (ꢀpyrrole NH), 1622 ꢀ(CH N–), 1462
ꢀ(–N–CH3).
2.4. Synthesis of copper(II) 5,10,15,20-tetrakis[˛,˛,˛,˛-2-(2,6-
bis(4-methyl piperazine-1-yl-methyl)-4-iminomethyl
phenol)phenyl] porphyrin [(˛4-TNH2PP)L]Cu9
Compound [(␣4-TNH2PP)L] (0.5 g, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in
250 ml of DMF and Cu(OAc)2·2H2O (0.56 g, 2.2 mmol) was added to
this mixture, with N2 passed over the reaction mixture. The mixture