2
P. Kaur et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
chit@Cu(I) catalytic system was successfully extended towards
decarboxylative A -coupling. To the best of our knowledge this is
ionic liquid [bmim]OH could provide 4a only in 29% yield (entry
6). Interestingly, reaction under solventless conditions dramati-
cally enhanced the product yield (4a, 72%, entry 7). Further, the
catalyst amount in the reaction was optimized (entries 8–11) and
it was observed that the reaction proceeded efficiently when the
catalyst amount was reduced from 100 mg to 10 mg (4a, 92%, entry
3
the first report wherein recyclable chitosan-supported copper
3
catalyst has been reported for the decarboxylative A -coupling.
Results and discussion
1
1
0). Further, when the reaction temperature was increased from
00 °C to 140 °C the reaction completes within 45 min using 10
3
In A -coupling, mechanistically, aldehyde and amine react to
mg of the catalyst (entry 13, 4a, 93%). As expected, no product
generate imine/iminium ion, followed by nucleophilic addition of
3
19
could be detected when A reaction was performed with chitosan
alkyne (in situ generated metal-alkyne complex). Recently, the
research group of Dekamin12 has demonstrated that OH and NH
alone (entry 15). The reaction was also conducted under micro-
wave irradiations and a significant reduction in the reaction time
was observed (15 min) while the product 4a was obtained in com-
parative yield (90%, entry 14). So, the final optimized conditions for
the reaction were 1a (0.77 mmol), 2a (0.85 mmol) and 3a (1.00
mmol), chit@CuI (10 mg, 0.04 mmol%) at 140 °C under nitrogen
atmosphere. Use of 1:1:1 of 1a:2a:3a under similar reaction condi-
tion, provided comparatively lower yield of the product. Here it is
2
group on biopolymer chitosan facilitate the imine formation from
corresponding aldehyde and amine via hydrogen bonding network.
3
These findings and mechanistic rationale of A -coupling incited us
to explore the chitosan-supported metal catalysts for this reaction.
Various chitosan-supported copper catalysts (chit@CuI, chit@CuBr,
2 4
chit@Cu(OAc) and chit@CuSO
) were prepared.18 These catalysts
were analysed by FT-IR, FE-SEM-EDS, TGA, ICP-MS and AAS spec-
troscopy. For instance, the amount of Cu content of freshly pre-
pared chit@CuI catalyst, as measured by ICPMS and AAS was
found to be 2 wt%. FT-IR spectra of chitosan showed characteristic
overlapping absorption bands of OAH and NAH stretching vibra-
important to mention that while conducting the reaction under N
2
atmosphere (entries 1–15), we haven’t observed the formation of
any homocoupling product of alkyne (i.e., diphenylbutadiyne).
3
However, when A -coupling was performed under air, a small
À1
amount of homocoupling product was detected (<4% yield, GC–
MS) along with desired 4a in 87% yield (entry 16).
tions around 3429 cm which became a bit sharper and stronger
in case of chit@CuI catalyst with a little shift in the position of
other characteristics bands (See; SI). FE-SEM analysis of chit@CuI
catalyst clearly showed the morphological changes on the surface
of chit@CuI catalyst when compared with pure chitosan polymer
The scopes and limitations of the developed reaction conditions
(
Table 1, entry 13) were ascertained using a variety of optionally
substituted aldehydes, amines and alkynes as coupling partners
Table 2). The chit@CuI catalyst was found compatible with alipha-
(
(
Fig. 1a and b). The FE-SEM-EDS analysis clearly illustrate the
presence of copper and iodine in the chitosan supported catalyst
Fig. 1c).
FE-SEM-EDS elemental maps were recorded at a selected region
tic as well as aromatic benzaldehydes (irrespective of o,m,p-posi-
tion of substituents) bearing electron-donating (EDG’s) or
electron-withdrawing groups (EWG’s). However, reaction of ben-
(
zaldehyde containing strong EWG, NO
sponding product could be isolated in comparatively lower yield
4e, 58%) along with unreacted starting material and unidentified
2
was found slow and corre-
of chit@CuI catalyst which clearly represent the dispersity of cop-
per on the surface of chitosan (Fig. 2).
30
(
TGA was used to determine the thermal stability of chitosan
and chit@CuI catalyst (See; SI). Two well defined signals
were obtained at heating rate of 10 °C/min. The first signal at
T < 100 °C is connected to loss of water which is loosely bound
on chitosan surface whereas second signal (254–580 °C) represents
side products. On the other hand, hydroxy substituent on ben-
zaldehyde 4f and sterically hindered aromatic aldehydes 4g were
well tolerated. In comparison to aromatic aldehydes, the reaction
of an aliphatic aldehyde along with morpholine and pheny-
3
lacetylene (4h,76%) provided A product in comparatively lower
6
0.7% weight loss due to the release of volatile components by the
yield. The catalytic system was found compatible with different
types of cyclic secondary amines such as morpholine, piperidine,
N-methyl/phenyl piperazine and acyclic secondary amine such as
thermal degradation of chitosan.
To evaluate the efficacy of the synthesized catalysts (Table 1), a
model reaction employing 3-chlorobenzaldehyde (1a), morpholine
N-methylbenzyl amine. However, reaction with primary amines
(2a) and phenylacetylene (3a) as coupling partners was conducted.
3
(
4q, 4r and 4 s) as one of the A component could not proceed
Initially, it was planned to check the ability of chitosan@copper
catalysts for this reaction using benign solvents such as water or
ionic liquids. The screening of various chitosan@copper catalysts
under present reaction condition. Notably, aryl alkyne provided
comparatively better yield than aliphatic alkynes (4u). No product
could be isolated using trimethyl silylacetylene as a coupling part-
ner (4v). The reaction was also conducted using acetophenone
(
100 mg per 0.77 mmol of 1a) was carried out in water (2 mL) at
1
00 °C (Table 1, entries 1–4), wherein chit@CuI provided 4a in
(
replacing aldehyde with ketone), amine and phenylacetylene but
1
7% yield (entry 3). Use of chit@CuI catalyst along with ionic liquid
no product (4w) formation was observed.
[
bmim]Br increased the yield of 4a up to 42% (entry 5). However,
Fig. 1. (a) FE-SEM image of chitosan, (b) FE-SEM image of chit@CuI catalyst, (c) FE-SEM-EDS spectrum of chit@CuI catalyst.