J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4715-4720
4715
Qu en ch in g of a P h otosen sitized Dye th r ou gh Sin gle-Electr on
Tr a n sfer fr om Tr iva len t P h osp h or u s Com p ou n d s
Shinro Yasui,*,† Munekazu Tsujimoto,† Kenji Itoh,‡ and Atsuyoshi Ohno‡,§
Tezukayama College, Gakuen-Minami, Nara, 631-8585, J apan, and Institute for Chemical Research,
Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, J apan
yasui@tandai.tezukayama-u.ac.jp
Received March 24, 2000
Various types of trivalent phosphorus compounds 1 undergo single-electron transfer (SET) to the
photoexcited state of rhodamine 6G (Rh o+*) in aqueous acetonitrile to quench the fluorescence
from Rh o+*. The rate constants kp for the overall SET process were determined by the Stern-
Volmer method. The rate is nearly constant at a diffusion-controlled limit in the region of E1/2(1)
< 1.3 V (vs Ag/Ag+), whereas log kp depends linearly on E1/2(1) in the region of E1/2(1) > 1.3 V, the
slope of the correlation line being -RF/RT with R ) 0.2. The potential at which the change in
dependence of log kp on E1/2(1) occurs (1.3 V) is in accordance with the value of E1/2(Rh o+*) (1.22
V) that has been obtained experimentally. Thus, the SET step is exothermic when E1/2(1) < 1.3 V
and endothermic when E1/2(1) > 1.3 V. The R-value (0.2) obtained in the endothermic region shows
that the SET step from 1 to Rh o+* is irreversible in this region. Trivalent phosphorus radical
cation 1•+ generated in the SET step undergoes an ionic reaction with water in the solvent rapidly
enough to make the SET step irreversible. In contrast, the SET from amines 2 and alkoxybenzenes
3 to Rh o+* is reversible when the SET step is endothermic, meaning that the radical cations 2•+
and 3•+ generated in the SET step undergo rapid “back SET” in the ground state to regenerate 2
and 3.
In tr od u ction
way in this model. This model in fact explains well a
kinetic behavior in many types of photoinduced SET
reactions and has eventually been found applicable to
SET reactions occurring in the dark.6 Nevertheless, in
some SET reactions, dependence of SET rate on free-
energy change is weaker than predicted by the Rehm-
Weller’s model at the region where the SET step is
endothermic.7-12 Schuster showed that such a kinetic
behavior is observed when the SET step is followed by a
rapid chemical reaction of the resulting radical pair;13
SET takes place in an irreversible way in this case.
A family of rhodamine dyes is a useful tool to study
SET processes kinetically, because a dye of this family
is intensely fluorescent on photoexcitation, and the
fluorescence is quenched through SET from one-electron
donors.14,15 That is, a rate constant of SET to this dye in
the photoexcited state is determined easily based on the
Stern-Volmer (SV) method. We examined the photore-
Trivalent phosphorus compounds Z3P readily undergo
single-electron transfer (SET) to good electron acceptors,
generating the corresponding trivalent phosphorus radi-
cal cations Z3P•+ 1,2
To elucidate energetics of SET
.
processes from Z3P is of great importance from a mecha-
nistic point of view and also because Z3P•+ has synthetic
potential.3 However, there has been no report so far,
except for the one from our group,4 to discuss such SET
processes quantitatively.
Rehm and Weller carried out kinetics on fluorescence
quenching occurring through SET in a number of donor-
acceptor pairs.5 To explain a relationship found between
SET rate and free-energy change, they presented a
mechanistic model by postulating that a radical pair
generated in the SET step disappears mainly through a
rapid back SET; that is, SET takes place in a reversible
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81-742-41-
4764; Fax: +81-742-41-4762.
(6) (a) Schlesener, C. J .; Amatore, C.; Kochi, J . K. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 3567-3577. (b) Patz, M.; Kuwahara, Y.; Suenobu, T.;
Fukuzumi, S. Chem. Lett. 1997, 567-568. (c) Baciocchi, E.; Lanza-
lunga, O.; Lapi, A.; Manduchi, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5783-
5787.
† Tezukayama College.
‡ Kyoto University.
§ Present address: Fukui University of Technology, Fukui, 910-8505,
J apan.
(1) (a) Yasui, S. Rev. Heteroatom Chem. 1995, 12, 145-161 and
references therein. (b) Yasui, S.; Shioji, K.; Tsujimoto, M.; Ohno, A.
Chem. Lett. 1995, 783-784. (c) Yasui, S.; Tsujimoto, M.; Shioji, K.;
Ohno, A. Chem. Ber./ Recueil 1997, 130, 1699-1707. (d) Yasui, S.;
Shioji, K.; Tsujimoto, M.; Ohno, A. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999,
855-862.
(7) Grimshaw, J .; Langan, J . R.; Salmon, G. A. J . Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 75-81.
(8) Save´ant, J .-M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 455-461.
(9) Bank, S.; J uckett, D. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 567-573.
(10) Gardner, H. C.; Kochi, J . K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1855-
1865.
(2) (a) Powell, R. D.; Hall, C. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 5403-
5404. (b) Pandey, G.; Hajra, S.; Ghorai, M. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 7837-7840.
(11) Chan, T. W.; Bruice, T. C.; J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7287-
7291.
(12) Thomas, M. J .; Foote, C. S. Photochem. Photobiol. 1978, 27,
683-693.
(3) (a) Ganapathy, S.; Dockery, K. P.; Sopchik, A. E.; Bentrude, W.
G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8863-8864. (b) Soma Sekhar, B. B.
V.; Bentrude, W. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1087-1090.
(4) Yasui, S.; Itoh, K.; Tsujimoto, M.; Ohno, A. Chem. Lett. 1998,
1019-1020.
(13) Schuster, G. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 5851-5853.
(14) Nakashima, N.; Yoshihara, K.; Willig, F. J . Chem. Phys. 1980,
73, 3553-3559.
(15) Itoh, K.; Chiyokawa, Y.; Nakao, M.; Honda, K. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 1620-1627.
(5) Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J . Chem. 1970, 8, 259-271.
10.1021/jo000448i CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/29/2000