Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.2 (2005)
193
H
RC
RuCl2(PPh3)2 (6, 0.15 mmol)
DD
DH
ND
RCH2OH
RCD2OH
Microwaves, 100 °C,
1M NaOD (3 mL), 1.5 atm, 60 min
RCHDNHD
D2O
RCH2ND2
DOH
D2O
RCH2NH2
RCH2NRuLn
RCHDNRuLn
(5, 3.0 mmol)
7
RuHDLn
CD2 OH
t-BuMe2SiO CH2 (CH2)8
CD2 OH
PhCH2O CH2 (CH2)8
RuLn
RuLn
DOH
RCHDND2
D
RC
7f, 100 °C, 1.5 atm, 60 min,
7g, 100 °C, 1.5 atm, 60 min,
DH
ND
DD
(87%D, 82%)
(>99%D, 68%)
RCD2NH2
RCD2NRuLn
RCHDONRuLn
RuHDLn
CD2 OH
MOMO CH2 (CH2)8
CD2 OH
AcO CH2 (CH2)8
7h, 100 °C, 1.5 atm, 60 min,
7i, 0.02 M, NaOD (3 ml)
100 °C, 1.5 atm, 60 min,
(92%D, 85%)
Scheme 7. Working hypothesis for H–D exchange reaction of
primary amine with D2O and RuCl2(PPh3)3.
(92%D, 85%)
In the parentheses: (the ratio of D-atom contribution at
α−carbon, isolated yield)
RCH2NH2
RCD2ND(H)2
Scheme 5. Regioselective H–D exchange of primary alcohols in
basic condition under microwave irradiation.
RuCl2(PPh3)3 (6, 0.09 mmol)
or
or
(RCH2)2NH
(RCD2)2ND(H)
Microwave, 150 °C, D2O (3 ml)
10 atm, 30 min
(12, 3.0 mmol)
13
(CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CD2)2ND
13b, 92%D at -position, 85%
4, because a mixture of deuterium oxide and 6 generates DCl.
When the reactions were operated in basic deuterium oxide,
these groups were intact and H–D exchange on the ꢀ-carbon
of alcohol proceeded selectively, as shown in Scheme 5.
n-C7H15CD2ND(H)2
13a, 94%D at -position, 79%
α
α
D
D
ND(H)
D
CD2
(CH2)4
CD2 ND(H)2
(H)D2N
Optically active primary alcohols with the stereogenic cen-
ter at ꢁ-position were also examined for this exchange reaction.
As shown in Scheme 6, (1S, 2S, 5S)-(–)-myrtanol (8) and (R)-2-
phenylpropanol were treated with RuCl2(PPh3)3 (6) and deuteri-
um oxide at 150 ꢁC under microwave irradiation. The exchange
proceeded in both cases to give the labelled alcohol, but some
epimerisation at ꢁ-position was observed. In these cases, a par-
tial deuteration was also observed at ꢁ-position (9: 38%D, 11:
30%D). Tuning the reaction temperature solved this racemiza-
tion problem. The reaction below 100 ꢁC with microwaves (in-
ternal pressure 1.5 atm) did not cause the epimerisation. When
the substrate was treated with the catalyst 6 in refluxing deuteri-
um oxide (bp. 101.4 ꢁC, 1.0 atm) for 1 h by simple external heat-
ing, only slight deuteration on ꢀ-carbon was observed (12%).
Irradiation by microwaves is different from simple external
heating, because polar species such as catalyst 6 and ruthenium
alkoxide are heated selectively by microwave irradiation.8,9
D
13c, 90%D at
α
-position, 64%
13d, 91%D at
α
-position, 68%
Scheme 8. Regioselective ruthenium catalyzed H–D exchange of
primary/secondary amines.
pounds based on transition metal-catalyzed direct C–H activa-
tion have been reported.11,12 The present method may also be
classed a catalytic C–H activation, but one should recognize that
the reaction proceeds as a result of transition metal catalyzed re-
dox equilibrium of primary alcohols in water. The method may
be applied for the regioselective labelling for more complex
compounds such as sugar or DNA. This is now underway.
References
1
M. Edmonds and A. Abell, in ‘‘Modern Carbonyl Olefination,’’ ed. by T.
Takeda, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2003).
H. Tomioka, K. Oshima, and H. Nozaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 23, 539 (1982);
Y. Ueno and M. Okawara, Tetrahedron Lett., 17, 4597 (1976); B. M. Trost
and Y. Masuyama, Tetrahedron Lett., 25, 173 (1984).
H. Tomioka, K. Takai, K. Oshima, and H. Nozaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 22,
1605 (1981); S.-I. Murahashi, K.-I. Ito, T. Naota, and Y. Maeda, Tetrahedron
Lett., 22, 5327 (1981).
A. Miyata, M. Murakami, R. Irie, and T. Katsuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 7067
(2001); R. H. Meijer, G. B. W. L. Ligthart, J. Meuldijk, J. A. J. M. Vekemans,
L. A. Hulshof, A. M. Mills, H. Kooijman, and A. L. Spe, Tetrahedron, 60,
1065 (2004); T. Naota, H. Takaya, and S. Murahashi, Chem. Rev., 98,
2599 (1998).
M. Takahashi, K. Oshima, and S. Matsubara, Tetrahedron Lett., 44, 9201
(2003).
C. Balzarek and D. R. Tyler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 38, 2406 (1999).
B. L. Hayes, in ‘‘Microwave Synthesis,’’ CEM Publishing, Matthews (2002).
M. Yamamoto, K. Oshima, and S. Matsubara, Chem. Lett., 33, 846 (2004).
A. R. Katritzky and S. M. Allin, Acc. Chem. Res., 29, 399 (1996).
2
3
4
OH
RuCl2(PPh3)3
(6, 5 mol%)
OH
CD2
D%
100
93
β/α of 9
15/85
<1/>99
T°C
150, 10 min
100, 60 min
Yield% of 9
95
90
MW, T °C
8
9
RuCl2(PPh3)3
(6, 5 mol%)
Ph
Ph
T°C
D%
%ee of 11
80
>99
5
Yield% of 11
OH
OH
150, 10 min 100
100, 60 min 87
95
90
CH3
CD2
11
CH3
(10, >99%ee)
MW, T °C
6
7
8
9
Scheme 6. Deuteration of Optically Active Alcohols.
10 S. E. Diamond, G. M. Tom, and H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 2661
(1975); T. Kondo, T. Okada, and T. Mitsudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 186
(2002); K. Yamaguchi and N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 42,
1480 (2003).
The same working hypothesis as in Scheme 2 may be appli-
cable for primary and secondary amines.10 As shown in Scheme
7, it may be possible that H–D exchange on ꢀ-carbon of pri-
mary/secondary amines is induced by the same condition as in
Scheme 4.
As shown in Scheme 8, primary and secondary amines were
examined for the H–D exchange reaction. In all cases, H–D ex-
change reactions were observed on ꢀ-carbon selectively. The
deuterium proportion on nitrogen atom in 13 was variable ac-
cording to the aqueous work-up procedure. A work-up with
1 M NaOD gave the high contents of deuterium on nitrogen
atom. As a tertiary amine, trihexylamine was examined for the
reaction. A small amount of H–D exchange was observed, but
the deuterium distribution was less than 12%.
11 S. R. Klei, J. T. Golden, T. Don Tilley, and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 124, 2092 (2002); L. P. Kingston, W. J. S. Lockley, A. N. Mather, E.
Spink, S. P. Thompson, and D. J. Wilkinson, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 2705
(2000); G. J. Ellames, J. S. Gibson, J. M. Herbert, W. J. Kerr, and A. H.
McNeill, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 6413 (2001); F. A. L. Anet and M. St.
Jacques, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 2585 (1966); J. L. Ganett and R. J. Hodges,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 4545 (1967); O. Desponds and M. Schlosser, Tetrahe-
dron Lett., 37, 47 (1996); H. Sajiki, K. Hattori, F. Aoki, K. Yasunaga, and K.
Hirota, Synlett, 2002, 1149; C. Hardacre, J. D. Holbrey, and S. E. J. McMath,
Chem. Commun., 2001, 367; J. G. Atkinson, M. O. Luke, and R. S. Stuart,
Can. J. Chem., 45, 1511 (1967); J. R. Jones, W. J. S. Lockley, S.-Y. Lu,
and S. P. Thompson, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 331 (2001).
12 S. Matsubara, Y. Yokota, and K. Oshima, Chem. Lett., 33, 294 (2004);
S. Matsubara, Y. Yokota, and K. Oshima, Org. Lett., 6, 2071 (2004); M.
Yamamoto, Y. Yokota, K. Oshima, and S. Matsubara, Chem. Commun.,
2004, 1714.
Many examples of H–D exchange reaction in organic com-
Published on the web (Advance View) January 15, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.192