Table 2 Conversion of 7 with subsequent use of the same catalyst–
ionic liquid system
Conversion
(%)a
Yield
(%)a
Yielda
(%) Napht.
Yielda
(%) 1,3,5
Yielda
(%) 1,2,4
Run
1
2
3
4
5
a
100
100
98
100
99
75
70
68
70
66
60
56
53
57
53
6
6
7
6
6
9
8
8
7
7
Chart 2 The structures of the ionic liquids and substrates.
Based on the substrate and determined by GC analysis
Table 1 The cyclooligomerization of arylethynes 7 and 8 catalysed by
4 in ionic liquids 5 and 6 and in 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB)a
The possibility of recycling the catalyst several times and the use
of environment friendly solvents, compared with the other
cyclotrimerization catalyst–solvent systems, can be considered of
high value as also shown by other authors for the olefination of
aldehydes catalysed by an iron porphyrin in the same media.25
Entry Solvent Substrate Yieldb (%) 1 Yieldb (%) 2 Yieldb (%) 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
a
5
6
5
7
7
8
8
7
8
32
17
6
30
9
60
21e
67e
59
c
c
c
c
6
DCBd
DCBd
7
4
Valeria Conte,* Elfituri Elakkari, Barbara Floris, Valentina Mirruzzo
and Pietro Tagliatesta*
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Universita’ di Roma Tor
Vergata. Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy.
E-mail: pietro.tagliatesta@uniroma2.it; valeria.conte@uniroma2.it;
Fax: +3906-72594754; Tel: +3906-72594759
78e
c
c
Reactions carried out at 150 uC with a molar ratio Substrate/
Porphyrin 5 5700:1 and a volume ratio substrate/ionic liquids 1:3;
Yields determined by GC analysis; Trace; Reactions carried out
b
c
d
at 190 uC with a molar ratio Substrate/Porphyrin 5 5700:1 and a
volume ratio substrate/ionic liquids 1:3; Two isomers
e
Notes and references
1,3,5- and 1,2,4-triphenylbenzenes were obtained as minor
products (entries 1, 2 and 5). For compound 8, two naphthalene
derivatives were isolated, 8-methoxy-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)naphtha-
lene and 6-methoxy-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene in 1:1 iso-
meric ratio, while the triarylbenzenes were detected in trace
amounts (entries 3, 4 and 6). The turnover number for some
experiments was over 3000 for the first run and this characteristic
is highly desired when the cost of the catalysts is an important
parameter. Table 1 also shows that the results obtained by using
ionic liquid 6 are superior, for both the substrates, in terms of yield
of naphthalene derivatives, to those obtained in 5. The results
reported are interesting considering the few reports on the one-pot
synthesis of arylnaphthalene derivatives, which are an important
class of biologically active natural compounds.22–24
{ Before any experiment, the ionic liquids were dried under high vacuum at
80 uC for at least 8 hours to avoid the presence of water. After that, dry
nitrogen was used for the reaction but even using such precautions, the
corresponding acetophenones were produced in variable yields.
1 T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1995, 99, 2071.
2 J. D. Holbrey and K. R. Seddon, Clean Prod. Processes, 1999, 1,
233.
3 P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39,
3772.
4 M. J. Earle and K. R. Seddon, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000, 72, 1391.
5 P. Wasserscheid, in Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, ed. P. Wassercheid and
T. Welton, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002, pp. 213––257.
6 K. R. Seddon, Editorial, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 2, G25.
7 P. Tagliatesta, B. Floris, P. Galloni, A. Leoni and G. D’Arcangelo,
Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 7701.
8 J.-S. Cheng and H.-F. Jiang, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 643.
9 K. A. Srinivas, A. Kumar and S. M. S. Chauhan, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 2456.
10 L. P. Yur’eva, Russ. Chem. Rev., 1974, 43, 48.
11 K. P. C. Vollhardt, Acc. Chem. Res., 1977, 10, 1.
12 K. P. C. Vollhardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1984, 23, 539.
13 P. M. Maitlis, J. Organomet. Chem., 1980, 200, 161.
14 N. Shore, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 1081.
15 M. Lautens, W. Klute and W. Tam, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 49.
16 L. Huang, U. R. Aulwurm, F. W. Heinemann and H. Kisch, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem., 1998, 1951.
17 I. Amer, J. Blum and K. P. C. Vollhardt, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1990,
80, 323.
18 J. D. Holbrey and K. R. Seddon, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999,
2133.
The analysis of the data also shows that the results in DCB are
comparable to those obtained in 6 and this fact could be due to the
lower polarity of 6 which makes this solvent more similar to DCB.
Reactivity and selectivity found with the title reaction are
important per se. However, we feel that even more important is
the re-use of the ionic liquid–catalyst system. In fact we tested the
recyclability in consecutive experiments performed with the
solution of metalloporphyrin in ionic liquid after the stripping of
the reaction products.
Table 2 shows the catalytic efficiency of the catalyst 4 in IL 6
after 5 runs with ethynylbenzene as substrate. As reported in the
table, it is clear that the recycling of the catalyst slightly affects the
conversion and the total yield of the cyclooligomerization
products.
19 C. M. Gordon, J. D. Holbrey, A. R. Kennedy and K. R. Seddon,
J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 2627.
20 P. Boˆnhote, A. P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and
M. Gra¨tzel, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1168.
21 E. Elakkari, B. Floris, P. Galloni and P. Tagliatesta, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
in press.
22 R. S. Ward, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1995, 12, 183.
23 R. S. Ward, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1997, 14, 43.
24 R. S. Ward, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1999, 16, 75.
25 W. Sun and F. E. Ku¨hn, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 7415.
After the first reaction, the yield is influenced by the water
content of the IL but it can be almost stabilized by high vacuum
pumping.
In conclusion, the properties of the ionic liquid–metallopor-
phyrin system makes the oligomerization of arylethynes in this
system very appealing.
1588 | Chem. Commun., 2005, 1587–1588
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005