2
102
E. A. Savicheva et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2101–2103
Catalysts I and II were prepared by the procedure described
previously for complex I (Scheme 2).13–15 The reaction between
equimolar amounts of cis-[PdCl (C„NCy) ] and the corresponding
(Table 2).18 We also tested two aryl bromides (4-bromotoluene and
4-nitrobromobenzene) with phenylacetylene using 1 mol % of the
palladium catalyst and carried out the reaction for 72 h (Table 2,
entries 21 and 22). The products were obtained in yields of 12%
and 62% (conversions were 15% and 62%), respectively. In all cases
(except for entries 6 and 11), full conversions of the aryl iodides
were achieved.
The reaction was found to be applicable to a variety of aryl
iodides with electron-donating (entries 2–4, 6, 10, 11, and 14) or
electron-withdrawing (entries 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 20)
groups, and with one or even two ortho-substituents (entries 2,
4, 5, and 11). Terminal acetylenes with aryl-(entries 1–14) and
alkyl (entries 15–20) substituents could be employed.
The mass spectrum of the mixture after coupling iodobenzene
with 2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol (entry 18) showed fragments with
m/z values of 162, 144, and 142. These data proved the presence
of by-products formed via dehydration and reduction of the target
product. Such by-products were not detected in the other
Sonogashira reactions that we carried out.
2
2
hydrazine proceeded to completion in four hours in 1,2-dichloro-
ethane at reflux, and subsequent work-up provided complexes I
and II in yields of 95% and 85%, respectively.16 Both complexes
are air- and moisture-stable in the 20À80 °C temperature range,
and are also stable as ethanol solutions for at least four months.
To study the catalytic activity of complexes I and II we chose
the reaction of phenylacetylene with 4-iodotoluene.17 Cheap and
environment-friendly ethanol and potassium carbonate were used
as the solvent and base, respectively, in order to find a catalytic
system operating under mild conditions. The reaction conditions
were optimized in a standard manner (the variables were temper-
ature, reaction time and amount of catalyst). The reactions were
carried out in screw-capped vials with rapid stirring. No special
measures were used to protect the reactions from air. The results
are presented in Table 1.
At room temperature, the reaction proceeded too slowly (en-
tries 1 and 2). At 80 °C, full conversion of 4-iodotoluene was
achieved in two hours and the yield of the product, as determined
by GC, was 97% (entry 3). It was possible to reduce the amount of
the catalyst to 0.05 mol % (entry 4) without decreasing the yield.
Further reduction of the amount of catalyst led to longer reaction
times in order to reach 100% conversion of the aryl iodide (entry
To demonstrate the synthetic abilities of the catalytic system,
we performed two experiments on a gram scale with PhI and
4-NO
obtained the corresponding coupling products in good (84%,
PhC„CPh) or excellent (95%, 4-NO C„CPh) preparative yields
2 6 4
C H I and phenylacetylene. Based on 20 mmol of ArI, we
2 6 4
C H
1
9,20
(entries 1 and 8).
6
). In addition, long reaction times affected the selectivity of the
In conclusion, we have reported a general and efficient method
to obtain disubstituted acetylenes. Two catalysts I and II belonging
to the family of ADC palladium complexes were shown to be active
in copper-free Sonogashira reactions under mild conditions. No
protection from air was needed. The catalysts can be prepared
easily and are stable as ethanol solutions for at least four months.
Environment-friendly ethanol proved to be a suitable solvent for
the reaction. The method allowed Sonogashira cross-coupling
products to be obtained in good to excellent preparative yields
(up to 95%) on gram scale.
reaction and a decrease in the yield of the desired product was
detected (entries 6 and 8). The following conditions were found
to be optimum for catalyst I: 0.05 mol % of catalyst, ethanol at
8
0 °C, and excess potassium carbonate (entry 4). Similar results
were obtained with catalyst II (entries 9–13) and the optimum
conditions were the same as for catalyst I (entry 10).
Next, the scope of the reaction was studied with catalyst I and
eight different aryl iodides and four terminal acetylenes under
optimized conditions, until 100% conversions (of ArI) were attained
NH -NRR', CHCl , r.t.
NCy
NCy
2
3
NCy
Cl
R=H; R'=4-NO C H
2 6 4
Cl
Cl
Pd
Pd
NHCy
Cl
NH -NRR', DCE, reflux
2
HN
NRR'
R=R'=Ph
complex I: R=H; R'=4-NO C H
6 4
complex II: R=R'=Ph
2
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the catalysts.
Table 1
1
7
Optimization of the reaction conditions (optimal conditions are in bold)
I or II
I
Ph
Ph
EtOH, K CO
2
3
air
Entry
Catalyst (mol %)
T (°C)
Time (h)
Conversion of 4-MeC
6
H
4
I (%)
6 4
Yield of 4-MeC H C„CPh (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I (0.1)
I (0.1)
I (0.1)
21
21
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
24
96
2
2
2
4
4
24
2
2
12
28
10
25
97
96
58
82
39
65
92
94
81
43
53
100
100
61
100
45
I (0.05)
I (0.02)
I (0.02)
I (0.01)
I (0.01)
II (0.1)
II (0.05)
II (0.02)
II (0.01)
II (0.01)
84
100
100
100
47
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
4
24
70